536 Organometallics, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2003
Fenwick et al.
Sch em e 1
complicated literature procedures also exist for the
synthesis of other arenethiols, including 2,6-diisopro-
pylbenzenethiol,11 2,6-dimesitylbenzenethiol,12 and 2,4,6-
tri-tert-butylbenzenethiol.13
There are numerous studies involving titanium com-
pounds that contain from one to six arylsulfide ligands,
and several crystal structures have been reported.14
However, compounds of the type [CpTi(SAr)Cl2] have
received limited attention. Their utility as cancer in-
hibitors was reported in 1984,15 and in 1996 a process
for manufacturing ethylene R-olefin copolymers in the
presence of cyclopentadienyltitanium catalyst compo-
nents was patented.16 These studies focused on very few
arenethiols, and there are no data reported in the
Cambridge Structural Database for any of these species.
One example of a structurally characterized Ti(III)
dimer with two bridging arylsulfides exists,17 but dimer-
ic species of the type [CpTiCl(µ-SAr)]2 are unknown.
Reported here are the synthesis and characterization
of several compounds of the type [CpTi(SAr)Cl2] and
dimeric species of the type [CpTiCl(µ-SAr)]2 formed via
one-electron reductions of the [CpTi(SAr)Cl2] complexes.
The solid-state structures of these compounds are
compared to those of the analogous aryloxide systems.
Although the dichlorides may have biological applica-
tions,18 we are interested in their potential synthetic
applications, particularly as titanacycle precursors.
method, the phenol was added to [CpTiCl3] in the
presence of pyridine, resulting in the desired product
and pyridinium hydrochloride. This method proved
unsuccessful for the synthesis of the arylsulfide systems,
resulting instead in a large amount of the previously
reported [pyH][CpTiCl4],6 as confirmed by X-ray crystal-
lography. In the second method, lithiation of the ben-
zenethiol using n-butyllithium and subsequent addition
of the lithio salt to [CpTiCl3] resulted in a good yield of
the desired product (Scheme 1). The NMR spectra of
1-4 were as expected, with one Cp resonance and a
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
Syn th esis a n d Ch a r a cter iza tion of Mon ocyclo-
p en ta d ien yltita n iu m Ar ylsu lfid e Com p lexes. Syn-
thesis of the mixed-cyclopentadienyl/arylsulfide com-
pounds was attempted using two methods employed
successfully for the aryloxide analogues. In the first
1
single set of arylsulfide signals in each case. In the H
NMR spectrum of 1-3, the Cp protons were observed
at δ 6.13, 6.12, and 6.15 ppm, respectively, which are
shifted downfield from the δ 5.3-6.0 ppm range typical
for [CpTi(OAr)Cl2] compounds. The Cp resonance for 4
appears further upfield at δ 5.78 ppm as a result of the
diamagnetic shielding by the ortho phenyl rings.
Compounds 1-4 have been analyzed by X-ray crys-
tallography (Table 1), and ORTEP drawings for 2 and
4 are represented in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. The
titanium dichlorides exhibit a pseudo-tetrahedral ge-
ometry about the metal center. Selected structural
parameters, along with those for related [(X)Ti(Y)Cl2]
derivatives (X, Y ) Cp, OAr),6,19 are collected in Table
2. The Ti-Cl bond distance decreases as Cp is replaced
by OAr and, to a lesser extent, upon replacement by
SAr, reflecting the relative electrophilicity at the metal
center. The Cp-Ti-S bond angles are substantially
contracted compared to those of the analogous X-Ti-Y
angles in the bis(Cp), bis(aryloxide), or mixed-Cp/
aryloxide compounds. In addition, the Ti-S-C bond
angle is significantly smaller than the Ti-O-C bond
angles in the analogous systems. The largest Ti-S-C
bond angle observed in these systems is 107°, while the
smallest reported Ti-O-C angle is 150°.
(11) Schrock, R. R.; Wesolek, M.; Liu, A. H.; Wallace, K. C.; Dewan,
J . C. Inorg. Chem. 1988, 27, 2050-2054.
(12) Ellison, J . J .; Ruhlandt-Senge, K.; Power, P. P. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 1178-1180.
(13) Look, K.; Norris, R. K. Aust. J . Chem. 1999, 52, 1077-1083.
(14) (a) Osakada, K.; Hosoda, T.; Yamamoto, T. Bull. Chem. Soc.
J pn. 2000, 73, 923-930. (b) Alcock, N. W.; Clase, H. J .; Duncalf, D. J .;
Hart, S. L.; McCamley, A.; McCormack, P. J .; Taylor, P. C. J .
Organomet. Chem. 2000, 605, 45-54. (c) Carmalt, C. J .; Dinnage, C.
W.; Parkin, I. P.; White, A. J . P.; Williams, D. J . J . Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. 2000, 3500-3504. (d) Kim, J . T.; Park, J . W.; Koo, S. M.
Polyhedron 2000, 19, 1139-1143. (e) Lindsell, W. E.; Rosair, G. M.;
Spence, M. A. J . Organomet. Chem. 1999, 577, 9-14. (f) Firth, A. V.;
Stephan, D. W. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 4732-4734. (g) Delgado, E.;
Garcia, M. A.; Hernandez, E.; Mansilla, N.; Martinez-Cruz, L. A.;
Tornero, J .; Torres, R. J . Organomet. Chem. 1998, 560, 27-33. (h) Dias,
A. R.; Galvao, A. M.; Galvao, A. C.; Salema, M. S. J . Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. 1997, 1055-1061. (i) Firth, A. V.; Stephan, D. W. Organome-
tallics 1997, 16, 2183-2188. (j) Corwin, D. T., J r.; Corning, J . F.; Koch,
S. A.; Millar, M. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1995, 229, 335-342. (k) Delgado,
E.; Hernandez, E.; Hedayat, A.; Tornero, J .; Torres, R. J . Organomet.
Chem. 1994, 466, 119-123. (l) Nadasdi, T. T.; Huang, Y.; Stephan, D.
W. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 347-356. (m) Nadasdi, T. T.; Stephan, D.
W. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 5933-5938. (n) Sigel, G. A.; Power, P. P.
Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 2819-2822. (o) Besancon, J .; Camboli, D.;
Trimaille, B.; Dusausoy, Y. C. R. Seances Acad. Sci., Ser. 2 1985, 301,
83-86. (p) Shaver, A.; McCall, J . M.; Bird, P. H.; Ansari, N. Organo-
metallics 1983, 2, 1894-1896. (q) Muller, E. G.; Watkins, S. F.; Dahl,
L. F. J . Organomet. Chem. 1976, 111, 73-89.
(15) Koepf-Maier, P.; Grabowski, S.; Koepf, H. Eur. J . Med. Chem.s
Chem. Ther. 1984, 19, 347-352.
(16) Watanabe, T.; Katayama, H.; Imai, A. J P Patent 95-13553
19950131; J pn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho, 1996.
(17) Firth, A. V.; Stephan, D. W. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 4726-4731.
(18) (a) Robson, R. L.; Eady, R. R.; Richardson, T. H.; Miller, R. W.;
Hawkins, M.; Postgate, J . R. Nature 1986, 322, 388. (b) Hales, B. J .;
Case, E. E.; Morningstar, J . E.; Dzeda, M. F.; Mauterer, L. A.
Biochemistry 1986, 25, 7251. (c) Steifel, E. I.; Matasumoto, K. Transi-
tion Metal Sulfur Chemistry: Biological and Industrial Significance;
American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1996.
Known Ti-S-C bond angles for terminal arylsulfides
on titanium metal centers range from 87 to 123°, on the
basis of a survey of all reported examples.14 A plot of
Ti-S distances versus the Ti-S-Ar angles indicates
that Ti-S bonds are typically between 2.27 and 2.45 Å
(19) (a) Clearfield, A.; Warner, D. K.; Saldarriaga-Molina, C. H.;
Ropal, R. Can. J . Chem. 1975, 53, 1622. (b) Dilworth, J . R.; Hanich,
J .; Krestel, M.; Beck, J .; Strahle, J . J . Organomet. Chem. 1986, 315,
C9. (c) Waratuke, S. A.; Thorn, M. G.; Fanwick, P. E.; Rothwell, A. P.;
Rothwell, I. P. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9111.