ligand class 2 (Figure 1) due to the success of these and
other related P,N ligands in palladium-catalyzed transforma-
tions.6 The sulfinyl imine scaffold was thus designed to
incorporate a chelating phosphine and sp2 nitrogen in
positions relative to the chiral center that are analogous to
those in the phosphinooxazoline scaffold. Ligand 3 was
selected for initial optimization of the allylic alkylation
conditions. Preparation of 3 was completed in a single step
via Ti-mediated condensation of tert-butanesulfinamide with
commercially available 2-(diphenylphosphino)benzaldehyde
(Scheme 1). A range of solvents and Pd reagents was then
for high enantioselectivity (entry 7). This interesting result
when an excess of ligand is present could potentially be due
to displacement of the chiral sulfinyl imine moiety from
palladium by the phosphine of another ligand molecule to
give a less stereoselective catalyst.
Having identified optimal reaction conditions for 3, the
effects of varying both R1 and R2 of the ligand structure
(Figure 1) were investigated. With 4, the reaction proceeded
slowly and the product formed was racemic (Table 1, entry
8), suggesting that either the greater steric bulk or the
increased electron-donating ability of the tert-butyl group
relative to the p-tolyl group is required for catalytic activity
and stereoselectivity. Ketimine ligand 7 (Scheme 2) was next
Scheme 1. One-Step Synthesis of Sulfinyl Imine Ligands
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Ketimine Ligand 7
explored in the allylic alkylation of 1,3-diphenylpropenyl
acetate using ligand 3 (Table 1). While moderate enantiose-
Table 1. Optimization of the Allylic Alkylationa
prepared in three steps from 2-(diphenylphosphino)benzoic
acid via the Weinreb amide intermediate 5. Under the
optimized conditions for the allylic alkylation reaction, 7
provided a modest increase in reaction rate but with a
significant reduction in stereoselectivity (Table 1, entry 9).
To elucidate the way in which 3 imparts stereoselectivity,
an X-ray crystal structure was obtained of the π-allyl Pd(II)
complex of 3, which corresponds to the Pd(II) intermediate
in the catalytic cycle (Figure 2). This structure confirms that
ligand 3 binds palladium through phosphorus and nitrogen
to form a six-membered ring chelate. Similar to previously
reported π-allyl Pd crystal structures, the palladium in
complex 8 has a slightly distorted square-planar geometry,7
and the disorder of the allyl unit reflects a known η3-η1-
η3 isomerization.8
Notably, the bond lengths between palladium and the
carbons of the allyl unit exhibit a trans influence similar to
that reported for other P,N ligands (Table 2).9 It has been
shown that mixed chelate ligands can electronically induce
asymmetry due to the lengthening, and thus increased
reactivity, of the Pd-allyl carbon bond trans to the better
π-acceptor. Nucleophilic attack is known to occur prefer-
entry
L*
solventb
Pd source
timec (h)
% eed
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
7
CH3CN
CH3CN
THF
C6H6
C6H6
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
[Pd(allyl)Cl]2
Pd2dba3‚CHCl3
Pd2dba3‚CHCl3
[Pd(allyl)Cl]2
Pd2dba3‚CHCl3
[Pd(allyl)Cl]2
[Pd(allyl)Cl]2
[Pd(allyl)Cl]2
[Pd(allyl)Cl]2
6
1
5
43
53
67
86
88
93
41f
0
26
>33e
8.5
20
>25e
5
56
a Reactions run with 30 mol % L* and 1:1.3 L*/Pd. b Reactions run at
[0.07] in substrate. c Time required for disappearance of starting material
by TLC analysis. d Determined by chiral HPLC (Chiralpak AD). e Reaction
was not complete in time indicated. f Reaction run with 20 mol % 3 and
2:1 3/Pd.
lectivities were observed in coordinating solvents (entries
1-3), a significant improvement in selectivity occurred upon
switching to benzene (entries 4 and 5). We were pleased to
find that in methylene chloride (entry 6), the Pd complex of
3 generated from [Pd(allyl)Cl]2 catalyzed the allylic alkyl-
ation reaction with 93% ee and in high conversion. Surpris-
ingly, an excess of palladium relative to ligand was required
(7) (a) Sprinz, J.; Kiefer, M.; Helmchen, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35,
1523. (b) Albinati, A.; Kunz, R.; Amman, C.; Pregosin, P. Organometallics
1991, 10, 1800 and references therein.
(8) Von Matt, P.; Lloyd-Jones, G.; Minidis, A.; Pfaltz, A.; Macko, L.;
Neuburger, M.; Zehnder, M.; Ruegger, H.; Pregosin, P. HelV. Chim. Acta
1995, 78, 265.
(9) Frost, C.; Howarth, J.; Williams, J. Tetrahdron: Asymmetry, 1992,
3, 1089.
(6) (a) Helmchen, G.; Pfaltz, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 336. (b) Hou,
D.-R.; Reibenspies, J.; Burgess, K. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 206. (c)
Gilbertson, S.; Xie, D.; Fu, Z. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7240. (d) Saitoh,
A.; Morimoto, T.; Achiwa, K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1997, 8, 3567.
546
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 4, 2003