2552
J. Dyck et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 690 (2005) 2548–2552
The reactions of this triethylphosphorane were inves-
chemical yields up to 80%. To achieve high levels of
retention, the use of the tributylphosphorane or
tri(iso)butylphosphorane in conjunction with an elec-
tron deficient carboxylic acid appears to be the optimal
combination. All of these results are in accord with the
modified view [2c] of the mechanism outlined in Scheme
1. Applications of these reagents towards the synthesis
of natural products are in progress and will be reported
in due course.
tigated side by side with the tributyl analog and the re-
sults summarized in Table 3. Entries 1 and 2 were
conducted under conditions expected to provide a high
degree of retention (electron deficient, non-hindered
acid). As can be seen, the triethylphosphorane provides
a higher degree of inversion even here. Most signifi-
cantly, entries 4–7 show that high degrees of inversion
of configuration can be obtained using the triethylphos-
phorane for the coupling of chiral secondary alcohols
and electron rich, sterically unencumbered acids (no
ortho-substituents), particularly with the use of 4-meth-
oxybenzoic acid. These results contrast to the use of the
tributylphosphorane analog, with which only the use of
electron-rich hindered ortho-substituted acids provided
such high inversions.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can
Overall, these results clearly demonstrate that the ste-
ric bulk of the alkyl groups present on the phosphorus
atom of the phosphorane play a significant but predict-
able role on the stereochemical outcome of the reaction.
Less bulky groups favor inversion of stereochemistry
while bulky butyl groups favor retention of configura-
tion. These results reported for the uncongested triethyl-
phosphorane provide further structural evidence in full
agreement with the current mechanistic picture of the
reaction.
References
[1] O. Mitsunobu, M. Yamada, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 40 (1967)
2380.
[2] (a) For comprehensive reviews see: O. Mitsunobu, Synthesis
(1981) 1;
(b) D.L. Hughes, Org. React. 42 (1992) 335;
(c) R. Dembinski, Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2004) 2763.
[3] (a) D.L. Hughes, R.A. Reamer, J.J. Bergan, E.J.J. Grabowski, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 110 (1988) 6487;
In conclusion, the new dimethylmalonyltrialkylphos-
phorane class of esterification reagent has been extended
and the steric effect of the substituent on phosphorus
probed. We feel that these reagents have much potential;
they are easy to prepare and can be handled in air for
short periods of time. They provide halogen, acid and
base free reaction media for esterification reactions
and thus tolerant of a variety of functional groups. They
have been successfully employed in the coupling of a
wide range of primary and secondary alcohols with var-
ious carboxylic acids [6]. The ester product can be puri-
fied with relative ease using as aqueous base-organic
partition sequence to remove the water and base soluble
side products. Lastly, a major advantage of this new
class of reagent is the controlled levels of inversion or
retention that can be achieved through careful choice
of reagents. To achieve high levels of inversion on a chi-
ral secondary alcohol, two optimum combinations of re-
agents are recommended. The use of 2,6-disubstituted
benzoic acids in conjunction with the tributylphospho-
rane results in a formation of the corresponding benzo-
ates with chemical yields up to 90% and high inversion.
Alternatively, the combination of p-methoxybenzoic
acid with the triethylphosphorane reagent provides the
corresponding inverted p-methoxybenzoates with high
(b) C. Ahn, R. Correia, P. DeShong, J. Org. Chem. 67 (2002)
1751.
[4] (a) For further mechanistic discussions see: M. Varasi, K.A.M.
Walker, M.L. Maddox, J. Org. Chem. 52 (1987) 4235;
(b) D.D. Camp, I.D. Jenkins, Aust. J. Chem. 41 (1988) 1835;
(c) D. Crich, H. Dyker, R.J. Harris, J. Org. Chem. 54 (1989) 257;
(d) D. Camp, I.D. Jenkins, J. Org. Chem. 54 (1989) 3045;
(e) J.A. Dodge, J.I. Trujillo, M. Presnell, J. Org. Chem. 59 (1994)
234;
(f) D.L. Hughes, Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 28 (1996) 127;
(g) W. Adam, N. Narita, Y. Nishizawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106
(1984) 1843.
[5] C. Ahn, P.J. DeShong, Org. Chem. 67 (2002) 1754.
[6] J. McNulty, A. Capretta, V. Laritchev, J. Dyck, A. Robertson, J.
Org. Chem. 68 (2003) 1597.
[7] A.B. Smith III, I.G. Safonov, R.M. Corbett, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
124 (2002) 11102.
[8] X. Liu, Y. Wu, J.K. De Brabander, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 42
(2003) 1648.
[9] J. McNulty, A. Capretta, V. Laritchev, J. Dyck, A. Robertson,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 42 (2003) 4051.
[10] (a) T. Tsunoda, F. Ozaki, S. Ito, Tetrahedron Lett. 35 (1994)
5081;
(b) K. Uemoto, A. Kawahito, N. Matsushita, I. Sakamoto, H.
Kaku, T. Tsunoda, Tetrahedron Lett. 42 (2001) 905.
[11] (a) F. Zaragoza, H. Stephensen, J. Org. Chem. 66 (2001) 2518;
(b) F. Zaragoza, J. Org. Chem. 67 (2002) 4963.
[12] S. Ito, T. Tsunoda, Pure Appl. Chem. 71 (1999) 1053.