Scheme 1. Ligand Synthesisa
Scheme 2. Asymmetric Heck Reactiona
a Reagents and conditions: (a) CO, 100 psi, Pd(OAc)2/dppp,
N-methylaminophenol, TEA, DMF, 55%; (b) Tf2O/DMAP, 89%
(c) BIPI ligands, Pd2dba3, PMP, Ph2O, 95 °C 18 h.
Overman using BINAP as ligand.7b We also utilized the
triflate rather than the iodide as our starting point, reasoning
that our ligands would likely be similar to the PHOX ligands
where triflates were found to be superior.6c The substrate
was prepared in two steps via carbonylation of vinyltriflate
6 with N-methylaminophenol and subsequent sulfonation
(Scheme 2).
Our first experiments involved BINAP and the tert-butyl-
phosphinooxazoline ligands. We found that BINAP furnished
the product 8 in 65% ee3 and 90% yield, whereas the t-Bu-
PHOX gave 46% ee in dioxane (20% yield) as determined
by chiral HPLC analysis. We envisioned that triflate 7 was
therefore an interesting and challenging asymmetric Heck
substrate for us to examine with the BIPI ligands.
A single experimental protocol was developed and strictly
adhered to for all ligands.3 The reaction was heated for 18
h at 95 °C and then worked up regardless of the level of
completion, and the product chromatographically isolated.
We felt this would give us some measure of the practicality
of the reaction as the long reaction times common to much
of the asymmetric Heck literature would not be used. We
used diphenyl ether as solvent after examining several
solvents of different dielectric constants and found the less
polar solvents gave the highest enantioselectivities. This
observation has previously been made with a variety of
triflate substrates in the AHR6c reaction. This solvent has
both a fairly low dielectric constant (e ) 3.65) and a high
boiling point, 242 °C, making its use convenient.
The initial screening results are collected in Table 1.
Several conclusions could readily be made. When basic
ligands (R3 ) Me, Bn) were used, we always obtained the
enantiomer opposite from that found with the nonbasic lig-
ands (N-acylated) with the same underlying diamine stereo-
chemistry. In addition, the imidazolines substituted on car-
bon by alkyl groups (fused cyclohexyl, t-butyl) always gave
the enantiomer opposite from that with imidazolines substi-
a Reagents and conditions: (a) EtOH/reflux or TEA/DCM, 44-
98%; (b) Ar2PM, M ) Li, Na, K, THF, 42-90%; (c) R3X, base,
41-88%; (d) R3X, base, 70-99%; (e) Ar2PH, Pd, base, 27-62%.
DMSO to be broadly applicable in this regard. In general,
cross-coupling via the iodide was found to be the more gen-
eral approach, since all ligands could be prepared by this
method, regardless of the phosphine nucleophilicity or aryl-
halide electrophilicity involved. The SNAr reactions are gen-
erally higher yielding, though, and thus were utilized where
possible. In all cases, the moderately air-sensitive ligands
were then purified by chromatography. We utilized C18 flash
chromatography extensively for this purpose. Since oxygen
is far less soluble in polar solvents than in nonpolar ones,
little or no oxidation occurred during purification with the
MeCN-H2O and alcohol-H2O eluents used for this tech-
nique.5
With the newly developed ligands in hand, we chose an
asymmetric Heck reaction (AHR) as our first area of study.
The majority of the work in this area has been carried out
on dihydrofuran and dihydropyrrole substrates.6 Part of the
enantiocontrol in these systems can occur by means of kinetic
resolution of the intermediates which follow â-hydride
elimination.6b We were instead interested in studying the
“moment of truth” in which the new stereocenter was created
and to explore the electronic requirements for this transfor-
mation. To accomplish this for the asymmetric Heck reaction,
it is therefore necessary to generate a quaternary center
without the possibility for olefin isomerization in the product.
This can only be achieved through an intramolecular
process.7
We chose triflate 7 (Scheme 2) as our initial substrate since
its oxindole product 8 had previously been prepared by
(5) (a) Ohsaka, T.; Che, Y.; Tokuda, K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1998, 71,
651. (b) James, H. J.; Broman, R. F. Anal. Chim. Acta 1969, 48, 411.
(6) (a) Loiseleur, O.; Hayashi, M.; Schmees, N.; Pfaltz, A. Synthesis
1997, 1338. (b) Ozawa, F.; Hayashi, T. J. Organomet. Chem. 1992, 428,
267. (c) Ozawa, F.; Kobatake, Y.; Hayashi, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34,
2505.
(7) (a) Ashimori, A.; Bachand, B.; Overman, L. E.; Poon, D. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6477. (b) Ashimori, A.; Bachand, B.; Calter, M. A.;
Govek, S. P.; Overman, L. E.; Poon, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
6488.
596
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 4, 2003