pathway. Lignin-biosynthetic-pathway mutants and trans-
genics provide useful perturbations to “normal” lignification
that allow normally minor components to be substantially
enhanced and therefore structurally analyzed, to better
understand the lignification process.
a chain-extended oligomer/polymer, also with the general
formula 3. Recent studies have begun to elucidate the
propensity for the monolignols to cross-couple with (free-
phenolic) guaiacyl and syringyl units in lignins.10 No data
on cross-coupling of the hydroxycinnamaldehydes into
lignins are available.
The lignin-biosynthetic-pathway enzyme CAD (cinnamyl
alcohol dehydrogenase) is the last enzyme on the pathway
to the monolignols coniferyl and sinapyl alcohols 2G and
2S, from which lignins are normally derived (Figure 1).
When CAD is downregulated, the hydroxycinnamyl aldehyde
precursors to the monolignols, coniferyl aldehyde 1G and
sinapyl aldehyde 1S, build up and may be incorporated into
the polymer by radical coupling.5 Indeed, it was readily
shown that coniferyl aldehyde would incorporate into
synthetic lignins under biomimetic conditions.5f Hydroxy-
cinnamyl aldehydes 1 and hydroxybenzyl aldehydes 5
derived from them are well-known components of lignins
isolated from normal plants,7 as well as mutant or transgenic
plants.5 In a CAD-downregulated tobacco transgenic, the
aldehyde incorporation into the lignin was significant.5b
Detailed proof that the aldehydes intimately incorporate into
the polymer, cross-coupling with normal lignin oligomers,
will be published elsewhere8 (brief arguments are given
below). In this paper, we report on the cross-coupling
propensities of coniferyl and sinapyl aldehydes with guaiacyl
and syringyl units in lignins. Data revealing such details of
plant lignification are rarely obtained.
With the availability of a 13C-enriched lignin from a CAD-
deficient tobacco transgenic,5b NMR methods can be used
to ascertain hydroxycinnamyl aldehyde in vivo cross-
coupling propensities. Figure 1 (right) shows a selected
region of the HMBC spectrum from the CAD-deficient
tobacco lignin,11 with peaks in the 13C-projection and the
resultant contours in the HMBC spectrum colored to match
structures on the left for easy identification. In fact, the
aldehyde structures in the lignins likely have been further
incorporated into the polymer by primarily 4-O-coupling with
the next monolignol, so they are not strictly the phenolic
compounds 4 indicated. Available coupling sites are indicated
in Figure 1 by the dashed arrows. Correlation of the aldehyde
carbonyl carbons in crossed dimers 4 to the H7-protons
3-bonds away identifies the type of lignin units involved.
Protons H7 resonate at ∼7.3 ppm for hydroxycinnamyl
aldehydes (either 1G or 1S) coupled 8-O-4 to guaiacyl units
3G (compounds 4GG and 4SG, δC ) 188.1 ppm), whereas
they resonate considerably upfield at ∼6.7 ppm when
coupled 8-O-4 to syringyl units 3S (compounds 4GS and
4SS, δC ) 186.8 ppm). Correlations from these H7 protons
into the ring identify the hydroxycinnamyl aldehyde involved
in the coupling; 3-bond correlations identify equivalent S2/6
carbons derived from sinapyl aldehyde 1S units at higher
field than the nonequivalent G2 and G6 carbons from units
derived from coniferyl aldehyde 1G. Therefore, for cross-
coupled units 4 in lignins, the G/S nature of both the
hydroxycinnamyl aldehyde component (coupled 8-) and the
lignin unit (coupled 4-O-) are diagnostically revealed. Other
aromatic protons in the complex lignin polymer resonate in
the H7 regions, so correlations that are not of interest here
will result; an absence of correlations is therefore more
diagnostic, revealing the absence of a component.
Radical cross-coupling of monolignols 2 with the growing
lignin oligomer/polymer 3 is the major reaction occurring
during lignification. Thus the hydroxycinnamyl alcohol 2
(primarily at its â-position) couples with phenolic units 3
(at the 4-O- or 5-position for guaiacyl units 3G, and almost
exclusively at the 4-O-position for syringyl units 3S)9 to form
(5) (a) Ralph, J.; MacKay, J. J.; Hatfield, R. D.; O’Malley, D. M.;
Whetten, R. W.; Sederoff, R. R. Science 1997, 277, 235-239. Note that
the new aldehyde peaks (analogous to 4 in Figure 1) were erroneously
assigned as 2-methoxybenzaldehydes in this paper, as subsequently
corrected.2c,5b (b) Ralph, J.; Hatfield, R. D.; Piquemal, J.; Yahiaoui, N.;
Pean, M.; Lapierre, C.; Boudet, A.-M. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 1998, 95,
12803-12808. (c) Yahiaoui, N.; Marque, C.; Myton, K. E.; Negrel, J.;
Boudet, A.-M. Planta 1998, 204, 8-15. (d) Stewart, D.; Yahiaoui, N.;
McDougall, G. J.; Myton, K.; Marque, C.; Boudet, A. M.; Haigh, J. Planta
1997, 201, 311-318. (e) Halpin, C.; Knight, M. E.; Foxon, G. A.; Campbell,
M. M.; Boudet, A.-M.; Boon, J. J.; Chabbert, B.; Tollier, M.-T.; Schuch,
W. Plant J. 1994, 6, 339-350. (f) Higuchi, T.; Ito, T.; Umezawa, T.; Hibino,
T.; Shibata, D. J. Biotechnol. 1994, 37, 151-158. (g) Provan, G. J.; Scobbie,
L.; Chesson, A. J. Sci. Food Ag. 1997, 73, 133-142. (h) Vailhe, M. A. B.;
Besle, J. M.; Maillot, M. P.; Cornu, A.; Halpin, C.; Knight, M. J. Sci. Food
Agric. 1998, 76, 505-514. (i) Halpin, C.; Holt, K.; Chojecki, J.; Oliver,
D.; Chabbert, B.; Monties, B.; Edwards, K.; Barakate, A.; Foxon, G. A.
Plant J. 1998, 14, 545-553.
(6) (a) Lapierre, C.; Tollier, M. T.; Monties, B. C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser. 3
1988, 307, 723-728. (b) Jouanin, L.; Goujon, T.; de Nada¨ı, V.; Martin,
M.-T.; Mila, I.; Vallet, C.; Pollet, B.; Yoshinaga, A.; Chabbert, B.; Petit-
Conil, M.; Lapierre, C. Plant Physiol. 2000, in press.
(7) (a) Lu¨demann, H.-D.; Nimz, H. Makromol. Chem. 1974, 175, 2409-
2422. (b) Lai, Y. Z.; Sarkanen, K. V. In Lignins, Occurrence, Formation,
Structure and Reactions; Sarkanen, K. V., Ludwig, C. H., Eds.; Wiley-
Interscience: New York, 1971; pp 165-240. (c) Chen, C.-L. In Methods
in Lignin Chemistry; Lin, Y., Dence, W. W., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: New
York, 1992; pp 446-457.
(8) Ralph, J.; Kim, H.; Lu, F.; Ralph, S. A.; Landucci, L. L.; Ito, T.;
Kawai, S.; Ohashi, H.; Higuchi, T. Incorporation of hydroxy-cinnamalde-
hydes into lignins; 2000, in preparation.
Of the four possible aldehyde incorporation products 4,
only three can be detected in the lignin by NMR methods.
Product 4GG is conspicuously absent. The data imply that
sinapyl aldehyde 1S cross-couples with both guaiacyl and
syringyl units (to form cross-coupled structures 4SG and
4SS) but that coniferyl aldehyde 1G cross-couples only with
syringyl units 3S and not with guaiacyl units 3G. Thus cross-
coupling product 4GS is readily detected, whereas 4GG
cannot be detected even when spectra are viewed at close to
the baseplane noise level. Attempting to prepare compounds
modeling 4GG by biomimetically cross-coupling coniferyl
aldehyde 1G (at the 8-position) with coniferyl alcohol 2G
or with a simple guaiacyl model 1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxy)-
(10) (a) Syrjanen, K.; Brunow, G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998,
3425-3429. (b) Syrjanen, K.; Brunow, G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
2000, 183-187.
(11) The acetylated CAD-deficient transgenic tobacco lignin was that
described previously (ref 5b). Gradient-HMBC spectra of the lignin and
model compounds were run on a Bruker DRX-360 using a 5 mm inverse
{1H-broadband} probe equipped with 3-axis gradients. The long-range
coupling delay was 80 ms.
(9) Another type of coupling is possible from monolignols 2 (at the
â-position) with guaiacyl or syringyl units 3 at the aromatic 1-position (â-
1-coupling); see ref 1.
2198
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 15, 2000