J. M. Concellꢀon et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 4665–4667
4667
Bodalski, R.; Wieczorek, M.; Bujacz, G. Tetrahedron
1995, 51, 1721–1740.
^
8. Tellier, F.; Sauvetre, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 5433–
5436.
9. Barma, D. K.; Kundu, A.; Zhang, H.; Mioskowski, C.;
Falck, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3218–
3219.
assuming a chelation-control model (Scheme 3). Thus, a
two-step reduction of the C–Cl bond in 2 promoted by
SmI2, affords the enolate intermediate 5, in which the
chelation of SmIII centre with both oxygen atoms pro-
duces a six-membered ring.19 Tentatively we propose a
transition state model I with the R1 in the equatorial
orientation. As depicted in II (C2–C3 Newman projec-
tion of I), R1 and Cl show a cis relationship. Conse-
quently, elimination20 from I affords (Z)-a-chloro-a,b-
unsaturated esters 1. No formation of a-chloro-b-
hydroxy ester was observed, indicating that the elimi-
nation reaction of intermediate 5 is more rapid than its
hydrolysis by the proton of the hydroxyl group.
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
10. Concellon, J. M.; Bernad, P. L.; Perez-Andres, J. A.
Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 2528–2530; Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 2384–2386.
ꢀ
11. (a) Starting from a-chloro-b-hydroxyesters: Concellon, J.
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
M.; Perez-Andres, J. A.; Rodrıguez-Solla, H. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2000, 39, 2773–2775; (b) From a,b-
ꢀ
epoxyesters: Concellon, J. M.; Bardales, E. Org. Lett.
2002, 4, 189–191.
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
12. Concellon, J. M.; Perez-Andres, J. A.; Rodrıguez-Solla, H.
In conclusion, we present a simple and general method
for the preparation of (Z)-a-chloro-a,b-unsaturated
esters 1 with high stereoselectivity from the easily
available a,a-dichloro-b-hydroxyesters 2, with the
reaction being promoted by samarium diiodide. A
mechanism has been proposed to explain this reaction.
Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 3062–3068.
ꢀ
13. Concellon, J. M.; Bernad, P. L.; Bardales, E. Org. Lett.
2001, 3, 937–939.
14. Unlike many of their main group and transition metal
counterparts, inorganic lanthanide compounds are gener-
ally classified as nontoxic when introduced orally. In fact,
samarium chloride and ytterbium chloride exhibit similar
toxicity to that of sodium chloride (LD50 of >2000–
6700 mg/Kg in mice versus 4000 mg/Kg for NaCl). (a)
Haley, T. J. J. Pharm. Sci. 1965, 54, 663–670; (b) Bruce, D.
W.; Hietbrink, B. E.; DuBois, K. P. Toxicol. Appl.
Pharmacol. 1963, 5, 750–759; (c) Rare Earths Reminder,
Acknowledgements
ꢀ
We thank Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura (PB97-
1278) for financial support. J.M.C. thanks Carmen
^
Rhone-Poulenc, Paris, 1986.
15. Namy, J. L.; Girard, P.; Kagan, H. B. Nouv. J. Chim.
1977, 1, 5–7.
ꢀ
Fernandez-Florez for her time. M.H. thanks to Minis-
terio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte for a predoctoral
ꢀ
ꢀ
16. General procedure for the synthesis of compound 2: To a
)78 °C stirred solution of lithium diisopropylamide [pre-
pared from MeLi (7.3 mL) of 1.5 M solution in diethyl
ether (11 mmol), and diisopropylamine (1.04 mL,
11 mmol) in THF (30 mL) at 0 °C] was added dropwise
the corresponding a,b-dichloroester 3 (10 mmol). After
stirring for 10 min, a solution of the corresponding
aldehyde (12 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) was added
dropwise at )78 °C and the mixture was stirred for 2 h.
Then, the reaction mixture was quenched with a saturated
aqueous solution of NH4Cl (20 mL). Usual workup
provided crude a,a-dichloro-b-hydroxyesters 2. Purifica-
tion by flash column chromatography on silica gel
(hexane/AcOEt) provided pure compounds 2.
17. General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 1: A
solution of SmI2 (1.0 mmol) in THF (12 mL) was added,
under a nitrogen atmosphere, to a stirred solution of the
corresponding a,a-dichloroester 2 (0.4 mmol) in THF
(2 mL) at room temperature and for the time specified in
Table 1 (the reaction times were established by TLC).
Then, the reaction was quenched with aqueous HCl
(20 mL of 0.1 M solution). Usual workup afforded crude
a-chloro-a,b-unsaturated esters 1, which were purified by
column flash chromatography over silica gel (20:1, hexane/
AcOEt).
fellowship. Our thanks to Scott J. S. Hartman for his
revision of the English.
References and notes
1. (a) Crombie, L.; Krasinski, A. H.; Manzoor-I-Khuda, M.
J. Chem. Soc. 1963, 4970–4976; (b) Bohlmann, F.; Miethe,
R. Chem. Ber. 1967, 3861–3868; (c) Hirayama, N.;
Shimizu, K.; Shirahata, K.; Ueno, K.; Tamura, G. Agric.
Biol. Chem. 1980, 44, 2083–2087; (d) Onda, M.; Konda,
Y.; Hinotozawa, K.; Omura, S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1982,
30, 1210–1214; (e) Cho, H.; Beale, J. M.; Graff, C.; Mocek,
U.; Nakagawa, A.; Omura, S.; Floss, H. G. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 12296–12304; (f) Ojika, M.; Niwa, H.;
Shizuri, Y.; Yamada, K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1982, 628–629; (g) Grote, R.; Zeeck, A.; Drautz, H.;
€
Zahner, H. J. Antibiot. 1988, 41, 1275–1276; (h) Werner,
G.; Hagenmaier, H.; Drautz, H.; Baumgartner, A.;
€
Zahner, H. J. Antibiot. 1984, 37, 110–117; (i) Omura, S.;
Imamura, N.; Hinitizawa, K.; Otoguro, K.; Lukacs, G.;
Faghih, R.; Tolmaann, R.; Arison, B. H.; Smith, J. L. J.
Antibiot. 1983, 36, 1782–1786.
2. Takai, K.; Tezuka, M.; Utimoto, K. J. Org. Chem. 1991,
56, 5980–5982.
3. (a) Forti, L.; Ghelfi, F.; Pagnoni, U. M. Tetrahedron Lett.
€
1995, 17, 3023–3026; (b) Buschmann, E.; Schafer, B.
Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 2433–2438.
4. (a) Mitani, M.; Kobayashi, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1994,
18. The stereoselectivity in the synthesis of a,b-unsaturated
esters by using the Wittig reaction, is affected, in some
cases, by the presence of bulky groups on the carboxyl
ester: Maryanoff, B. E.; Reitz, A. B. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89,
863–927.
^
67, 284–286; (b) Masure, D.; Sauvetre, R.; Normant, J. F.;
Villieras, J. Synthesis 1976, 761–764.
19. Similar six-membered ring transition state models have
been proposed to explain the selectivity in some Barbier-
type reactions promoted by SmI2: (a) Urban, D.; Skrydst-
rup, T.; Beau, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2507–2516; (b)
Molander, G. A.; Etter, J. B.; Zinke, P. W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1987, 109, 453–463.
5. Alami, M.; Crousse, B.; Linstrumelle, G. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1995, 36, 3687–3690.
6. Ishihara, T.; Shintani, A.; Yamanaka, H. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 4865–4868.
7. (a) Tay, M. K.; About-Jaudet, E.; Collignon, N.; Savi-
gnac, P. Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 4415–4430; (b) Janecki, T.;
20. Other examples of b-elimination reactions promoted by
SmI2: Refs. 10–13.