Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
have also been the subject of extensive theoretical examinatio-
n.11i,j The extent of tunneling that accompanies hydrogen atom
transfer to peroxyls in solution has been the subject of less
rigorous experimental and theoretical analyses. The high H(D)
KIEs reported here for tetralin autoxidation calls for further
examination of structure−reactivity patterns for hydrogen atom
transfer from C−H bonds to peroxyl radicals in solution coupled
with a theoretical analysis of such transformations.
Table 1. Kinetic Isotope Effects in Autoxidation of Deuterated
Tetralins
a
entry
KIE
OOH
OH
1
2
3
4
5
H,h/D,d
H,h/H,d
D,h/D,d
H,d/D,d
H,h/D,h
15.9 1.4
1.16 0.04
1.26 0.06
14.4
16.1 1.4
1.10 0.08
1.13 0.02
14.5
13.0
14.1
a
Data from NMR analysis of hydroperoxides (OOH) and alcohols
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
(OH).
S
* Supporting Information
Detailed experimental procedures, characterization data, and 1H
and 13C NMR spectra for all starting materials and products. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.
reaction (kD,d), Table 1, entry 1. The secondary effect of a
deuterium substitution on the removal of a hydrogen atom is
1.16 0.04 and is within values expected for this type of effect
(Table 1, entry 2). Similar NMR analyses for calculating the KIE
can be carried out with the mixture of tetralin alcohols that are
isolated after reduction of the primary product mixture.
However, the spectra are better resolved for tetralin hydro-
peroxides in C6D6 than for tetralin alcohols (examples available
in Supporting Information). Nevertheless, the same trend in KIE
values is observed for the KIEs obtained from analysis of the
tetralin alcohols.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
■
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
The competition KIE method can also be used for designed
pseudosymmetric substrates such as those shown in Figure 4.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
We thank the National Science Foundation (NSF-
CHE1057500) for financial support.
REFERENCES
■
(1) (a) Ingold, K. U. Acc. Chem. Res. 1969, 2, 1−9. (b) Chatgilialoglu,
C.; Ingold, K. U.; Scaiano, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 7739−7742.
(c) Johnston, L. J.; Lusztyk, J.; Wayner, D. D. M.; Abeywickreyma, A. N.;
Beckwith, A. L. J.; Scaiano, J. C.; Ingold, K. U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985,
107, 4594−4596.
(2) (a) Giese, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1983, 22, 753−764.
(b) Newcomb, M. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 1151−1176.
Figure 4. Other substrates evaluated.
(3) (a) Griller, D.; Ingold, K. U. Acc. Chem. Res. 1980, 13, 317−323.
(b) Roschek, B., Jr.; Tallman, K. A.; Rector, C. L.; Gillmore, J. G.; Pratt,
D. A.; Punta, C.; Porter, N. A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 3527−3532.
(4) (a) Howard, J. A.; Ingold, K. U. Can. J. Chem. 1965, 43, 2729−
2736. (b) Howard, J. A.; Ingold, K. U. Can. J. Chem. 1965, 43, 2737−
2743. (c) Howard, J. A.; Ingold, K. U. Can. J. Chem. 1966, 44, 1119−
1130. (d) Howard, J. A.; Ingold, K. U. Can. J. Chem. 1966, 44, 1113−
1118. (e) Howard, J. A.; Ingold, K. U.; Symonds, M. Can. J. Chem. 1968,
46, 1017−1022. (f) Howard, J. A.; Schwalm, W. J.; Ingold, K. U. In
Oxidation of Organic Compounds; American Chemical Society:
Washington, DC, 1968; Vol. 75, pp 6−23.
(5) (a) Russell, G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 4583−4590. (b) Xu,
L.; Davis, T. A.; Porter, N. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13037−13044.
(c) Pratt, D. A.; Tallman, K. A.; Porter, N. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44,
458−467.
(6) (a) Russell, G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 3871−3877. (b) Hill,
S.; Hirano, K.; Shmanai, V.; Marbois, B.; Vidovic, D.; Bekish, A.; Kay, B.;
Tse, V.; Fine, J.; Clarke, C. F.; Shchepinov, M. S. Free. Radic. Biol. Med.
2011, 50, 130. (c) Shchepinov, M. S.; Chou, V. P.; Pollock, E.; Langston,
J. W.; Cantor, C. R.; Molinari, R. J.; Manning-Bog, A. B. Toxicol. Lett.
2011, 207, 97. (d) Hill, S.; Lamberson, C. R.; Xu, L.; To, R.; Tsui, H. S.;
Shmanai, V. V.; Bekish, A. V.; Awad, A. M.; Marbois, B. N.; Cantor, C.
R.; Porter, N. A.; Clarke, C. F.; Shchepinov, M. S. Free. Radic. Biol. Med.
2012, 53, 893. (e) Muchalski, H.; Xu, L.; Porter, N. A. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2014, DOI: 10.1039/C4OB02377C.
Thus, the KIEs for the substrates 1,3-diethylbenzene-d2 (10)
were (kH,h/kD,d) 12.7
1.0 and 10.8
1.7, for analysis of
hydroperoxide and alcohol products leading to the conclusion
that the KIE for diethylbenzene is ∼11.7 1.7. Autoxidation of
dibenzylbenzene-d2 (11) gives kH,h/kD,d of 13.7 2.0 and 11
1.5 for analysis by the hydroperoxide and alcohol, respectively,
suggesting that the H(D) KIE for diphenylmethane is ∼12 2.
H(D) isotope effects substantially lower than the values
reported here have been determined by measurement of
peroxidation absolute rate constants for H and D substrates of
diphenylmethane H(D)KIE = 5.1.6 Attempts to measure H(D)
KIEs for tetralin were considered unreliable by one of us4c
because of questions about the quality of a commercial tetralin
available at the time. It is of some interest, however, that an H(D)
KIE of ∼18 was determined in tert-butyl-hydroperoxide tetralin
co-oxidations.4e
The values for tetralin, ethylbenzene, and diphenylmethane
are all greater than the H(D) KIE limit of ∼7 expected for the
classical model based on H(D) differences in zero-point energies.
Each of these H atom transfers is close to thermoneutral and each
occur with rate constants substantially below the diffusion limit.
H atom tunneling11 must play a significant role in these atom
transfers. Existing examples of tunneling have been reported for
exothermic or thermoneutral transformations, in which the
orientation of reactant C−H centers and the abstracting radical
are constrained by an enzyme active site,11i,j a reaction in a glass,
or an intramolecular geometry.11m The enzymatic trans-
formations have been studied in great experimental detail and
(7) (a) Simonian, N. A.; Coyle, J. T. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
1996, 36, 83−106. (b) Hollyfield, J. G.; Bonilha, V. L.; Rayborn, M. E.;
Yang, X.; Shadrach, K. G.; Lu, L.; Ufret, R. L.; Salomon, R. G.; Perez, V.
L. Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 194−198. (c) Yin, H.; Xu, L.; Porter, N. A. Chem.
Rev. 2011, 111, 5944−5972. (d) Xu, L.; Korade, Z.; Rosado, D. A.; Liu,
W.; Lamberson, C. R.; Porter, N. A. J. Lipid Res. 2011, 52, 1222−1233.
96
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 94−97