First TADA Deactivating Enone Dienophiles
SCHEME 4
B. Th eor et ica l P r oced u r es. Although most triene
systems undergoing TADA reactions could be adequately
handled by low-level calculations (semiempirical AM1
and PM3 methods),23 it quickly appeared that the TTT
case could not be treated as easily. In fact, reproducing
the TAC:CAT adduct ratio experimentally observed
proved impossible without the addition of empirical
corrections.24 We looked for a better way to model the
different effects arising in the competing transition states
(TSs) leading to the TAC and CAT TADA adducts, to put
sufficiently accurate figures on all the different interac-
tions involved. We calculated the different transition
states (TSs) corresponding to the TADA reactions at the
RHF/3-21G theory level25 by means of GAMESS.26 The
zero-point energy corrections were not applied due to the
large size of the systems, which always prevented such
calculations. However, these corrections are known not
to affect the relative energies between TSs in a significant
way.27 To estimate the activation energy corresponding
to each case, it was necessary to locate the lowest energy
macrocyclic conformers. We first performed a systematic
conformational search of each a the macrocycles using
the maximin2 force field within SYBYL.28 All conformers
having a relative energy below 4 kcal/mol were then
individually calculated at the RHF/3-21G ab initio level.
No conformers having an s-cis diene were found. Only
the lowest energy conformers were selected to calculate
the activation energy, because all other conformers were
less stable by at least 2 kcal/mol (apart from two
macrocycles where competing conformers were found
with relative energies of 0.44 and 1.11 kcal/mol in one
case and 1.28 kcal/mol in the other case). Although the
RHF/3-21G method is not sophisticated by current stan-
dards, we have already proven that it was very efficient
for our transannular systems.10 Moreover, numerous
calculations have to be carried out on rather large
systems, so that the RHF/3-21G theory level appears to
be the ideal compromise. We first validated its ability to
deal with our TTT systems by modeling the prototype
reaction from the triene 37 that yields a 67:33 mixture
of TAC and CAT adducts 38 and 39 (Chart 4).29 AM1
calculations give a 29:71 ratio, whereas a ratio of 72:28
is obtained by means of 3-21G calculations.30 This latter
ratio is therefore in excellent agreement with the experi-
mental results. Furthermore, these calculations allow us
to characterize the geometry of the favored transition
states. Thus, both adducts 38 and 39 must have issued
from chair-boat-chair (cbc) transition structures (46% and
28% respectively), but a fair share of the TAC adduct
should form through a chair-boat-boat (cbb) transition
a similar tricycle 32 obtained by TADA reaction of the
macrocycle 31 at an optimal temperature slightly above
115 °C (Scheme 4).12 Thus, the carbonyl function at C-11
of the trienone 1 lowers the TADA temperature by only
10 °C by comparison with the nonactivated series 31.
This almost nonexistent activation is further demon-
strated by the inability of Lewis acids to catalyze the
reaction:3c,21 When the macrocycle 1 was treated for 3 h
with tin tetrachloride in toluene at -20 °C, no trace of
tricycle was observed, and at room temperature, only
degradation products were obtained. The two other
“inactivated” trienes 2 and 3 were also submitted to the
TADA reaction conditions. The 11-R-acetoxy-isomer 2
starts reacting at 80 °C and yields only one adduct, the
TAC tricycle 6. The 11-â-isomer 3 reacts less readily,
since no significant amounts of TADA adducts 7, 8, and
9 are obtained below 105 °C.
The structure of compound 6 was confirmed by crystal
X-ray diffraction analysis22 and that of compound 8 was
determined by NMR correlation with the known tricycles
32 and 34 (Scheme 4).12 Compounds 7 and 8 could not
be separated because they have the same polarity in
various solvents. In the same way 9 could not be
separated from the starting material 3. According to the
1
shape of the H NMR CHOAc signals for the tricycles, 7
has an equatorial acetate (wide multiplet signal), whereas
8 and 9 have an axial acetate (narrow multiplet signal).
The respective relative geometry of the three tricycles
was then easily attributed according to these observa-
tions and to a previous experiment carried out on related
macrocycle 33. In that experiment, 36, the only CAT
adduct obtained, has the same geometry as 9 and the
TAC adduct 34 corresponding to 8 is also the most
abundant product (Scheme 4).
(23) Dory, Y. L.; Soucy, P.; Drouin, M.; Deslongchamps, P. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 518.
(24) Takahashi, T.; Sakamoto, Y.; Doi, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992,
33, 3519.
(25) Binkley, J . S.; Pople, J . A.; Hehre, W. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1980,
102, 939.
(26) Schmidt, M. W.; Baldridge, K. K.; Boatz, J . A.; Elbert, S. T.;
Gordon, M. S.; J ensen, J . H.; Koseki, S.; Matsuraga, N.; Nguyen, K.
A.; Su, S. J .; Windus, T. L.; Dupuis, M.; Montgomery, J . A. J . Comput.
Chem. 1993, 14, 1347.
(27) Garc´ıa, J . I.; Mart´ınez-Merino, V.; Mayoral, J . A.; Salvatella,
L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 2415.
(28) Tripos Inc.: 1699 South Hanley Road, St. Louis, MO 63144-
2913.
(21) (a) Yates, P.; Eaton, P. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 4436. (b)
Inukai, T.; Kojima, T. J . Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 924. (c) Fleming, I.
Frontier Orbitals and Organic Chemical Reactions; Wiley: New York,
1976; Chapter 4. (d) Yamabe, S.; Dai, T.; Minato. T. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1995, 117, 10994.
(22) Cambridge Data Bank reference for X-ray of tricycle 6: CCDC
190394. Formula:
Å, b ) 16.9509(16) Å, c ) 13.899(3) Å, â ) 113.728(19)°. Space group
P21/n.
C
116H176O36. Unit cell parameters: a ) 13.676(5)
(29) Ndibwami, A.; Lamothe, S.; Soucy, P.; Goldstein, S.; Deslong-
champs, P. Can. J . Chem. 1993, 71, 714.
(30) Zefirov, N. S. Tetrahedron 1977, 33, 2719.
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 68, No. 6, 2003 2393