6186 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 118, No. 26, 1996
Singh et al.
8.7 Hz, aromatic), 7.90 (4H, m, aromatic), 9.61 (1H, s, CHO). UV-
vis (MeOH, λmax, nm): 251 (ꢀ ) 7422), 310 (ꢀ ) 8698), 450 (ꢀ )
17 460). IR (CHCl3, cm-1) 3010, 1676, 1603, 1521, 1478, 1425, 1366.
Formation and Protonation of the n-Butylamine Schiff Bases of
Compounds I-III. Azo chromophore I (2.8 × 10-3 M) was taken in
0.8 mL of dry methanol and 0.2 mL of n-butylamine added to it. To
this was added a small amount of anhydrous sodium sulfate (5 mg)
and a bead of Linde 4 Å molecular sieves. The mixture was kept under
nitrogen at 4 °C overnight. The dark orange-red solution was filtered
through a small Buchner filter directly into a Schlenk type storage vessel
in which it was carefully evaporated to dryness using high vacuum
(10-3 Torr). The solid was redissolved in 1.0 mL of dry methanol and
stored under nitrogen at -20 °C. Protonation of Schiff base (1.0 ×
10-5 M) was carried out by addition of dry methanolic HCl under
nitrogen at 25 °C. Schiff bases of chromophores II and III were
similarly prepared and handled.
Scheme 1
Formation of Azo-Protein Complexes BR-I, BR-II, and BR-
III and Competitive Binding Studies. The azo chromophores I, II,
and III in ethanol were incubated with the apomembrane (4.0 × 10-5
M) in an aqueous medium, pH 5 (1.0 × 10-2 M Tris‚HCl buffer) at
ambient temperature in dim red light. The azo chromophore concentra-
tions were 9.0 × 10-4 M in all cases, and the final ethanol concentration
in the protein suspension was less than 3% v/v. Formation of the
respective azo-protein complexes was monitored by UV-vis absorp-
tion spectra over a period of hours. After 24 h, the azo-protein
complexes formed were washed free of excess chromophore by
centrifugation (50000g, 10 min). At the end of 24 h, each of the
incubation mixtures was supplemented with all-trans-retinal and the
increase of absorbance at 560 nm was measured. The percent
displacement was determined by measuring the ratio of the absorbance
at the UV-vis maximum for the respective BR analogue at 60 min
(the time taken for maximum displacement by retinal) and expressed
as a percentage.
Fluorescence Studies. BR-I, BR-II, and BR-III were washed
three times with 1.0 × 10-2 M Tris‚HCl (pH 5) buffer and centrifuged
(25000g, 30 min) to remove excess chromophore. The pellet was
resuspended in 1.0 × 10-2 M Tris‚HCl (pH 5). Bacterioopsin (BOP)
and BR were also suspended in Tris buffer (pH 5). The optical density
of all three solutions was adjusted to 0.5 (A280 ) 0.5) before recording
the fluorescent emission for 280 nm excitation.
Light-Induced pH Change Studies. Suspensions of native BR and
the modified proteins BR-I, BR-II, and BR-III in basal salt of high
optical density (A ) 0.8 at the wavelength of maximum absorbance in
the visible region) were prepared with the pH adjusted to 5 by the
addition of HCl. No buffers were used as they inhibit pH changes.
These were sonicated for 3 min using a Branson 450 sonifer at 4 °C.
This suspension (4 mL) was taken in a tube with an outer jacket
circulating water to maintain the temperature at 25 °C. The samples
were illuminated with a Philips tungsten-halogen lamp (230 V, 500
W). The distance between the sample and the light source was 12 cm.
pH changes were monitored with the pH meter. The amounts of protons
displaced as a function of time were monitored by recording the change
in pH upon turning the illumination source on and upon switching it
off.
Flash Photolysis Studies. Basal salt suspensions of purple mem-
brane fragments (A570 ) 0.8) and the BR analogues BR-I, BR-II,
and BR-III (A ) 0.8 at the wavelength of maximum absorbance in
the visible region) in Tris‚HCl buffer (pH 5) were taken in a quartz
cell for recording the flash photolysis decay profiles. The flash
photolysis profiles of the transient species were monitored between
400 and 420 nm.
nobenzaldehyde was synthesized following literature procedure.6 Nitra-
tion of trans-cinnamaldehyde and trans-R-methylcinnamaldehyde was
done as reported elsewhere.7 The reduction of the nitro compounds to
the corresponding amines was done following known procedures.8
Coupling of N,N-dimethylaniline with the corresponding amines was
done using a slight modification of known procedures.9 This was done
to avoid self-condensation of the compounds having both the amino
and aldehyde groups into polymeric Schiff bases. In a typical
procedure, concentrated HCl (0.4 mL) was dissolved in 20 mL of water
and cooled to 0 °C with stirring. A solution of amino compound (0.5
mmol) in acetone was added dropwise to the cooled solution over a
period of 30 min with constant stirring. A precooled solution of NaNO2
(37.0 mg, 0.53 mmol) in 2 mL of water was added dropwise to the
stirred suspension. A pinch of urea was added to the vigorously stirred
solution to destroy any excess nitrous acid remaining in solution. To
this solution was added dropwise a solution of N,N-dimethylaniline
(63.0 µL, 0.5 mmol) in 3 mL of glacial acetic acid with stirring. An
opaque yellow-red suspension resulted. This solution was vigorously
stirred for another 10 min, after which a saturated solution of sodium
acetate was added. Bright orange-yellow (for compound I) or orange-
red (for compounds II and III) flakes of the azo compounds appeared.
The crystalline solids were filtered and dissolved in acetone. The
compounds were purified by column chromatography over a silica gel
column and characterized by NMR, UV-vis, and IR spectroscopy. The
characterization data for the three azo compounds are as follows (s )
singlet, d ) doublet, m ) multiplet; ꢀ values are in L mol-1 cm-1).
4-[[4′-(N,N-Dimethylamino)phenyl-1′]azo]benzaldehyde (I). mp:
164-165 °C (uncorrected). Yield: 92%. NMR (CDCl3, δ, ppm): 3.12
(6H, s, NMe2), 6.75 (2H, d, J ) 9.0 Hz, aromatic), 7.94 (6H, m,
aromatic), 10.05 (1H, s, CHO). UV-vis (MeOH, λmax, nm): 229 (ꢀ
) 14 500), 284 (ꢀ ) 18 200), 449 (ꢀ ) 22 500). IR (CHCl3, cm-1):
3010, 1690, 1590, 1515, 1425, 1360.
3-[4-[[4′-(N,N-Dimethylamino)phenyl-1′]azo]phenyl-1]prop-2-
enal (II). mp: 204-205 °C (uncorrected). Yield: 97%. NMR
(CDCl3, δ, ppm) 3.11 (6H, s, NMe2), 6.76 (3H, m, aromatic + olefinic),
7.53 (1H, d, J ) 16.0 Hz, Ar-CH, olefinic), 7.68 (2H, d, J ) 8.4 Hz,
aromatic), 7.84 (4H, m, aromatic), 9.72 (1H, d, J ) 7.7 Hz, CHO).
UV-vis (MeOH, λmax, nm): 253 (ꢀ ) 5382), 313 (ꢀ ) 10 928), 461
(ꢀ ) 18 836). IR (CHCl3, cm-1): 3010, 1678, 1602, 1522, 1475, 1426,
1365.
3-[4-[[4′-(N,N-Dimethylamino)phenyl-1′]azo]phenyl-1]-2-methyl-
prop-2-enal (III). mp: 150-151 °C (uncorrected). Yield: 94%. NMR
(CDCl3, δ, ppm): 2.14 (3H, s, Me), 3.11 (6H, s, NMe2), 6.77 (2H, d,
J ) 9.0 Hz, aromatic), 7.30 (1H, s, Ar-CH, olefinic), 7.66 (2H, d, J )
Results and Discussion
pH Dependent UV-Vis Characteristics of Chromophores
I, II, and III. As evident from Table 1, the azo chromophores
I-III show pH dependent UV-vis behavior. This is explained
in Scheme 2. At high pH, the chromophore remains unproto-
nated. As the pH decreases, the availability of protons increases,
and at sufficiently low pH, one of the nitrogen atoms of the
azo group (-NdN-) becomes protonated, giving rise to large
red-shifted bands (e.g., 511, 517, and 511 nm for chromophores
(6) Beard, H. G.; Hodgson, H. H. J. J. Chem. Soc. 1944, 4.
(7) Diehl, L.; Einhorn, A. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1885, 18, 2335.
(8) Hirata, Y.; Nakata, H.; Yamada, K.; Okuhara, K.; Naito, T.
Tetrahedron 1961, 14, 25.
(9) Vogel’s Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry; Longman Group
Ltd.: Harlow, U.K., 1984; p 718.