Communications
[7] a) S. Wang, R. M. Leblanc, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1419,
317; b) A. Giehl, T. Lemm, O. Bartelsen, K. Sandhoff, A. Blume,
Eur. J. Biochem. 1999, 261, 650; c) R. Villard, D. Hammache, G.
Delapierre, F. Fotiadu, G. Buono, J. Fantini, ChemBioChem
2002, 3, 517; d) J. Hernandez, R. Pouplana, J. Estelrich, J.
Dispersion Sci. Technol. 1988, 9, 223; e) H. Zhao, A. C. Rinaldi,
A. D. Giulio, M. Simmaco, P. K. J. Kinnunen, Biochemistry 2002,
41, 4425; f) I. J. Vereyken, V. Chupin, R. A. Demel, S. C. M.
Smeekens, B. D. Kurijff, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2001, 1510, 307;
for an overview of the applications of lipid monolayers, see g) H.
Brockman, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1999, 9, 438.
to the interface. These observations indicate that in the absence
of CCIs intrinsic surface activity becomes the primary contrib-
utor to Dp.
[20] Glycolipid 4 had a Dp of 2.7 mNmÀ1 at an initial pressure of
10 mNmÀ1. At all other pressures examined the Dp value was
indistinguishable from the values observed in a ™holding∫
experiment.
[8] a) C. M. Knobler, Adv. Chem. Phys. 1990, 77, 397; b) S. Heyse, T.
Stora, E. Schmid, J. H. Lakey, H. Vogel, Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1998, 85507, 319; c) C. Yuan, L. J. Johnston, Biophys. J. 2000, 79,
2768; d) J. C. Conboy, K. D. McReynolds, J. Gervay-Hague, S. S.
Saavedra, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 968.
Synthesis of Pyrroles and Furans
[9] N. Kojima, B. Fenderson, M. Stroud, R. Goldberg, R. Haber-
mann, T. Toyokuni, S. Hakomori, Glycoconjugate J. 1994, 11,
238.
1,2-Migration of the Thio Group in Allenyl
Sulfides: Efficient Synthesis of 3-Thio-Substituted
Furans and Pyrroles**
[10] The glycolipids were prepared from the corresponding peracet-
ylated disaccharides by conversion into the glycosyl bromides
with HBr followed by silver triflate mediated glycosylation with
allyl alcohol. Subsequent ozonolysis, oxidation, and coupling to
tetradecylamine followed by Zemplen deacylation provided the
desired compounds. The synthetic glycolipids were characterized
by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy and high-resolution mass
spectrometry.
Joseph T. Kim, Alexander V. Kel©in, and
Vladimir Gevorgyan*
The 1,2-migration of the thio group is an important chemical
transformation that is extensively used in carbohydrate
chemistry for stereoselective Mitsunobu-type substitution at
the anomeric center [Eq. (1)].[1] There are also reports on
employment of a 1,2-shift of the thio group in the synthesis of
heterocycles [Eq. (2)][1a,b] Known 1,2-migrations of the thio
group can be classified as one of two types: 1) An SN2-type
attack of the lone pair of electrons of the sulfur atom at the
adjacent sp3 center in A produces the thiiranium intermediate
B, which after subsequent nucleophile-assisted ring opening
affords C, a product of 1,2-migration of the thio group
[Eq. (1)].[1] 2) The migration is triggered by attack of the
sulfur atom at the sp2 carbon atom of the iminium[2a,b] or
imine[2c] moiety of D to form the thiiranium species E. The
latter either produces sulfide F through nucleophilic attack[2c]
or gives the thioenamine G as a result of a deprotonation/
ring-opening process [R1 ¼ H, Eq. (2)].[2a,b] In all cases the
migrations of the thio group proceeded from an sp3 center to
either another sp3 [Eq. (1)][1] or to an sp2 [Eq. (2)][2] carbon
center. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports of
1,2-migration of the thio group from an olefinic carbon atom.
Herein we wish to report a novel 1,2-migration of the thio
group from an sp2 carbon atom in allenyl sulfides. This
unprecedented migration allowed the development of an
[11] A. Chattopadhyay, E. London, Anal. Biochem. 1984, 139, 408.
[12] The Langmuir monolayer experiments were carried out on a
KSV minitrough equipped with a Wilhelmy plate and balance. A
chloroform/methanol solution of a 10% GM3/90% DPPC
mixture was deposited with a microsyringe on a subphase of
1 mm CaCl2. The solvent was allowed to evaporate over 10 min,
and the monolayer was compressed at a rate of 3 mmminÀ1 until
the desired initial monolayer pressure for the binding experi-
ment was reached. Once the monolayer was at the target
pressure the barriers were stopped, and the subphase was stirred
gently outside the barriers. The binding experiment was initiated
by injection of 1.5 mL of a concentrated glycolipid solution into
the subphase outside the Teflon barriers.
[13] Negative Dp values are indicative of either lipid loss from the
monolayers owing to the high solubility of the glycolipids and/or
rearrangements within the monolayer after compression has
ceased. See a) J. Esnault, J.-M. Mallet, Y. Zhang, P. Sin‰y, T.
LeBouar, F. Pincet, E. Perez, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 253;
b) G. L. Gaines, Insoluble Monolayers at Liquid Gas Interfaces,
Interscience Publishers, New York, 1966, p. 143.
[14] Single-site modifications can have measurable effects on CCIs.
For examples in the context of glycopolymer recognition, see
references [3c,l,m].
[15] a) W. Cook, C. Bugg, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1975, 389, 428;
b) W. Cook, C. Bugg, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 6442.
[16] Another observation consistent with this hypothesis is that the
cmc value of 3 is higher in 1 mm CaCl2 than in deionized water.
This is in contrast to 4, 5, and Tween-80,[18] all of which show
decreases in cmc values on going from water to 1 mm CaCl2, as
might be expected in a solution of greater ionic strength.
[17] The surface activities or equilibrium surface pressures for 3, 4,
and 5 are: 26, 6, and 22 mNmÀ1, respectively.
[18] Binding studies of the GM3 monolayer at 30 mNmÀ1 with
Tween-80, a nonionic hydroxy-terminated detergent, which has
an equilibrium surface pressure of 28 mNmÀ1 and a cmc of 3 mm,
also failed to show a concentration-dependent increase in Dp.
[19] When GM3 was omitted from the monolayer, injection of 25 mm
3 or 5 afforded a Dp of 8 mNmÀ1 (30 mNmÀ1 starting pressure).
The rate of increase in p was slower in the absence of GM3 which
suggests that CCIs facilitate insertion by targeting the glycolipids
[*] Prof. Dr. V. Gevorgyan, J. T. Kim, A. V. Kel©in
Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Chicago
845 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60607-7061 (USA)
Fax: (þ1)312-355-0836
E-mail: vlad@uic.edu
[**] The support of the National Science Foundation (CHE-0096889)
and the National Institutes of Health (GM-64444) is gratefully
acknowledged.
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW
98
¹ 2003 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA,Weinheim
1433-7851/03/4201-0098 $ 20.00+.50/0
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42,No. 1