C-H Activation by [(N-N)Pt(CH3)(L)]+
Organometallics, Vol. 22, No. 11, 2003 2223
state must be the second step, i.e., the departure of TFE
from the five-coordinate intermediate.
These experiments are important to confirm that the
solution-phase studies have been properly performed.
This proposition is directly tested in the present
experimental report.
Having established that 1b behaves like 4b, we turn
first to the gas-phase study. While solvation leads to
large changes in the potential surfaces for gas-phase
ion-molecule reactions, such as proton exchange, SN2,
or carbonyl additions,26 relative to their congeners in
solution, reactions of organometallic complexes electro-
sprayed into the gas phase10 have proven surprisingly
similar to the corresponding reactions in solution in
other cases we have examined,10,11 leading us to pre-
sume that the analogy in this case is also valid. Even
so, solution-phase experiments in this report were
executed to confirm the expectation (vide infra). Four
observations may be made from the ion-molecule
reactions. First, we see the same gross reaction in
solution and in the gas phase. Second, the overall kinetic
isotope effects for the reaction in the two different
settings are similar; kH/kD ) 1.18 ( 0.06 in the gas-
phase versus 1.06 ( 0.05 in solution.4 Third, when
benzene-d6 is used instead of benzene, the distribution
of deuterium between methane and benzene products
shows nearly full equilibration and, furthermore, shows
a small partition isotope effect in the same direction
with a similar magnitude as that reported for the
solution-phase experiment. Last, in gas-phase experi-
ments, 1e/1f/2 gives branching ratios close to the
reported value of 82:18 for reductive elimination of
methane versus benzene observed when [(N-N)Pt-
(CH3)(C6H5)] is protonated in solution.4 It might be
argued that the reactions of 1a , a highly unsaturated
three-coordinate species, are not directly comparable to
those of four-coordinate 3c or 4c, or even to those of 1c,
for that matter, and that the gas-phase chemistry makes
therefore no relevant prediction for solution-phase
mechanisms.27 The argument fails because one notes
that isotope partitioning as well as the product branch-
ing ratio is determined not by the addition steps starting
from 1a , but rather by the reactions after formation of
1e/1f/2. The presumably equilibrating mixture 1e/1f/2
in the gas-phase represents exactly those species de-
picted as V, VI, VII, and VIII in solution (with the
proviso that one cannot yet distinguish between π- and
σ-complexes in the gas phase). These four observations
serve to show that the gas-phase chemistry does not
differ grossly from that in solution. In particular, the
significance of the addition reaction of 1a should be
understood as primarily a gas-phase synthesis of 1e/
While the gas-phase reaction studies formally involve
the species very similar to those postulated in solution,
the relevance of the present work to C-H activation in
solution requires that we first establish that the com-
plexes 1 are good models for the complexes 3 or 4. We
chose the complexes 1 for the gas-phase part of this
study because we had found in earlier work that
coordinatively and electronically unsaturated complexes
often tended to undergo intramolecular C-H activation
reactions, i.e., orthometalation, on a ligand.11 For com-
plexes 3 and 4 that were used in previous solution-phase
studies, orthometalation is a possible reaction pathway
which could complicate the gas-phase experiment that
would interfere because the isolated ion has a compara-
tively long time to react intramolecularly in the source
region of the mass spectrometer as compared to the
situation in solution. We therefore employed in this
study a ligand in which all ortho positions are blocked
by chlorine substitution, which made the unsaturated
complex stable against unimolecular reactions in the gas
phase. It should be noted that the aryl rings on the
ligands of 1, 3 and 4 are twisted out-of-plane,23 so the
electronic influence of substituents on the rings at the
metal center would come only through inductive effects.
In this light, the nearly identical values of σI for chloro
and trifluoromethyl substituents24 would suggest that
1b and 3b would display similar reactivity.25 The
solution-phase kinetics of 3b and 4b were reported to
be similar as well, with rates differing by less than 1
order of magnitude.7 It would not be unreasonable to
expect therefore broadly similar chemistry for 1b versus
3b or 4b. The expectation is fully borne out by the
solution-phase kinetics as illustrated in Figures 4-11.
Not only is the chemical behavior for complex 1b
essentially identical to that for 4b, but even the absolute
values of the rates are not too different, e.g., k ) (4.93
( 0.42) × 10-5 s-1 versus (9.24 ( 0.60) × 10-6 s-1 for
1b and 4b, respectively. Given that very substantial
data have been published for 3b and 4b, it is gratifying
to see that the rate constant measured in the present
work for 4b is in acceptable agreement with the value
of (1.98 ( 0.03) × 10-5 s-1 reported for the same complex
under the same conditions by Tilset, Bercaw, and co-
workers.4 Moreover, the clean isosbestic points in
Figures 4, 5, 8, and 9 indicate that it is possible to find
conditions under which all other side-reactions are much
slower than the transformation 1b f 1h or 4b f 4h .
(26) Wolf, J . F.; Harch, P. G.; Taft, R. W. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1975,
97, 2904. Farneth, W. E.; Brauman, J . I. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98,
7891. Aue, D. H.; Webb, H. M.; Bowers, M. T. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1976,
98, 311. Olmstead, W. N.; Brauman, J . I. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99,
4219. Staley, R. H.; Wieting, R. D.; Beauchamp, J . L. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1977, 99, 5964. Asubiojo, O. I.; Brauman, J . I. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1979, 101, 3715. Pellerite, M. J .; Brauman, J . I. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1980, 102, 5993. Arnett, E. M.; Peinta, N. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1980,
102, 3329. Sharma, S.; Kebarle, P. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 19.
Bohme, D. K.; MacKay, G. I. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 978.
Caldwell, G.; Magnera, T. F.; Kebarle, P. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106,
959. McMahon, T. B.; Heinis, T.; Nicol, G.; Hovey, J . K.; Kebarle, P. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 7591.
(23) The X-ray structure of 1 is given in the Supporting Information;
for related complexes, the X-ray structure was given in ref 6.
(24) Hines, J . Structural Effects on Equilibria in Organic Chemistry;
Wiley: New York, 1975.
(25) The Oslo and Caltech groups have remarked in ref 4 that [(N-
N)Pt(CH3)(L)]+, (N-N) ) Ar-NdC(CH3)-C(CH3)dN-Ar with Ar )
o,o′-dimethylphenyl, reacts similarly to
3 in TFE solution, only
somewhat more slowly and more cleanly. Moreover, ref 6 compares
the reactions of the complexes with fluorinated and unfluorinated
ligands in their reaction with toluene. While the complex with
unfluorinated ligand reacted more slowly, and moreover, produced a
product of benzylic C-H activation that was absent in the reactions
of 3, the ratio of ortho to meta to para C-H activation for the two
complexes was essentially identical. These observations suggest that,
in the reaction of [(N-N)Pt(CH3)(L)]+ with benzene, 1 and 3 should
not be expected to show gross mechanistic differences.
(27) Given the recent report of a crystal structure for a d8 ML3 Pt(II)
complex stabilized by an agostic interaction at the formally empty
fourth coordination site, one cannot lightly discount three-coordinate
species on the reaction coordinate. See: Baratta, W.; Stoccoro, S.;
Doppiu, A.; Herdtweck, E.; Zucca, A.; Rigo, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2003, 42, 105.