T. Fujii et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 2497–2499
2499
ments obtained by the dissociation of the glycosidic
Acknowledgements
bond or the amido bond. After many trials, we found
that the treatment of 12 by neat TFA within 30 s at rt
provided good results. The main product was a free
carboxylate form of 1 (82%) with a small amount of the
recovered starting material (9%). After subsequent
treatment with sodium carbonate, photoaffinity probe
112 was obtained.
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education,
Science, Sports and Culture (Japan) for Grant-in-Aid
for Scientific Research (No. 1302467 and 12680598),
Pioneering Research Project in Biotechnology given by
the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries,
Kato Memorial Bioscience Foundation, Naito Founda-
tion, Kurata Foundation, Moritani Foundation. This
work was also supported by Grant-in-Aid for the 21st
Century COE program ‘KEIO Life Conjugate Chem-
istry’ from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
Science, and Technology, Japan.
Probe 1 was effective for the leaf-opening of C. mimo-
soides at 8×10−5 M. Thus, the bioactivity of 1 was
one-eightieth as strong as that of the native factor. The
decrease in bioactivity compared with probe 3 could be
due to the steric hindrance in the binding with the
receptor molecule (Fig. 1).
References
Photodegradation of probe 1 was also examined. UV
light (u 365 nm) was irradiated to an aqueous solution
of 0.33 mM 1 for 60 min. The reaction was monitored
by the decrease in the peak intensity at 360 nm in UV
spectrum of the reaction mixture, that corresponds to
the absorption of the trifluoromethyldiazirine group.
The reaction mixture was then dried up and analyzed
by using negative-mode FAB MS to give the peak at
m/z 915 which corresponds to [15-H]− ion. This result
showed that probe 1 could react with the receptor
molecule by the radiation of UV light for 15 min.
1. Ueda, M.; Takada, N.; Yamamura, S. Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn. 2002, 75, 2337–2347.
2. Lee, Y. In The Pulvinus in Motor Organ for Leaf Move-
ment; Satter, R. L.; Gorton, H. L.; Vogelmann, T. C.,
Eds.; American Society of Plant Physiologists: Rockville,
1990; p. 130.
3. Ueda, M.; Wada, Y.; Yamamura, S. Tetrahedron Lett.
2001, 42, 3869–3872.
4. Sugimoto, T.; Wada, Y.; Yamamura, S.; Ueda, M. Tetra-
hedron 2001, 57, 9817–9825.
5. Sugimoto, T.; Yamamura, S.; Ueda, M. Chem. Lett.
2002, 1118–1119.
6. Sugimoto, T.; Fujii, T.; Hatanaka, Y.; Yamamura, S.;
Ueda, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 6529–6532.
7. Shigemori, H.; Sakai, N.; Miyoshi, E.; Shizuri, Y.; Yama-
mura, S. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 383–394.
8. Wong, T. C.; Townsend, R. R.; Lee, Y. C. Carbohydr.
Res. 1987, 170, 27–46.
9. Hatanaka, Y.; Hashimoto, M.; Kanaoka, Y. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 1994, 12, 1367–1373.
1
10. 14 H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD, rt): 7.64 (2H, d, J=8.8
Hz), 6.74 (2H, d, J=8.8 Hz), 6.71 (1H, s), 4.86 (1H, d,
J=7.1 Hz), 3.91 (1H, dd, J=8.3, 12.5 Hz), 3.87 (1H, dd,
J=0.7, 2.7 Hz), 3.81 (1H, dd, J=4.6, 12.5 Hz), 3.80 (1H,
dd, J=0.7, 4.6 Hz), 3.66 (1H, dd, J=2.9, 10.7 Hz), 3.63
(1H, dd, J=7.1, 10.7 Hz) ppm.; FAB MS (positive) m/z
The molecular design of photolabeling probes involves
an ambivalent issue: the nearer the large photolabeling
group is placed to the potential binding site of the
probe molecule, the weaker the bioactivity of the pho-
toaffinity probe becomes. In past photolabeling studies,
molecular design of the probe requires the cost of either
high binding affinity or biological activity because these
two factors are never compatible. This is the most
important problem in the photolabeling studies using
probe compound. However no example has been
reported to deal with this issue to evaluate the effectives
of these two factors.
324 [M+H]+: IR (film) w: 1670, 1606, 1512, 1441 cm−1
.
11. Chandrasekaran, S.; Kluge, A. F.; Edwards, J. A. J. Org.
Chem. 1977, 42, 3972–3974.
1
12. 1: H NMR (270 MHz, CD3OD, rt): 7.88 (1H, d, J=8.2
Hz), 7.65 (2H, d, J=8.6 Hz), 6.96 (1H, d, J=8.2 Hz),
6.80 (2H, s), 6.66 (2H, d, J=8.6 Hz), 5.32 (1H, d, J=8.6
Hz), 4.43 (2H, m), 4.25 (3H, m), 3.92–3.78 (5H, m),
3.73–3.45 (11H, m), 2.90 (1H, dd, J=4.9, 12.9 Hz), 2.67
(1H, d, J=12.9 Hz), 2.18 (2H, t, J=7.5 Hz), 1.66–1.41
(6H, m) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, rt): 172.3,
165.8, 165.8, 162.8, 157.2, 156.5, 131.6, 131.4, 131.0,
128.4, 125.9, 125.4, 123.1, 120.4, 118.9, 115.0, 111.3, 99.5,
77.6, 75.8, 75.5, 73.2, 69.8, 69.6, 69.2, 68.6, 67.2, 61.1,
60.1, 59.2, 55.4, 53.8, 38.4, 35.1, 29.0, 28.2, 28.0, 25.3
ppm.; HR-FAB MS (negative): [M−K]−. Found m/z
925.2899, C40H48O14N6F3S requires m/z 925.2901; IR
(film) w: 1693 1651, 1608, 1549, 1512 cm−1; [h]D24 −21.2° (c
0.5, MeOH).
We resolved this issue by using two photoaffinity
probes designed on different concepts. Now, we synthe-
sized two types of photoaffinity probes designed on
different concepts: probe 1 was designed for high label-
ing yield with the receptor molecule, whereas probe 2
was designed for high affinity with the receptor by
reducing the steric hindrance by large photolabeling
group. The detection of receptor molecules using these
two probes is now in progress.