The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Article
refined isotropically. For 1 and 2, their CCDC numbers of
crystal structures are 2031776 and 2031777, respectively (see
For 1: C78H66N4O17Zn2Nd, monoclinic (Cc), a = 33.516(8),
b = 14.576(3), c = 17.164(4) Å, α = 90°, β = 109.594(4)°, γ =
90°, V = 7900(3) Å3, Dc = 1.351 g cm−3, Z = 4, μ(Mo Kα) =
1.316 mm−1, T = 190 K, F(000) = 3372. R1 = 0.0721, wR2 =
0.2138, GOF = 1.009.
Scheme 1. Structure Diagram of the Designed Schiff Base
Ligand
For 2: C123H111Cd3N6O31Sm3, hexagonal (R3), a =
19.273(3), b = 19.273(3), c = 31.065(11) Å, α = 90°, β =
90°, γ = 120°, V = 9993(4) Å3, Dc = 1.474 g cm−3, Z = 3,
μ(Mo Kα) = 1.842 mm−1, T = 190 K, F(000) = 4407. R1 =
0.0867, wR2 = 0.1875, GOF = 1.144.
[Cd3Sm3L3(OAc)6(OH)3] (2). The Cd−Sm complex 2 shows
a triangular structure with 12 electron-rich groups such as
naphthyl and phenyl rings from H2L, which is beneficial to
forming π···π interactions with aromatic compounds. Interest-
ingly, 2 exhibits both visible and NIR lanthanide luminescent
responses to nitrobenzene explosives, especially to 2,4,6-
trinitrophenol (PA) with high sensitivity.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
■
Synthesis and Characterization. According to well-
established procedures,34 H2L was obtained from the
condensation reaction of 1,1′-binaphthyl-2,2′-diamine and 2-
hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde (Figure S1), with a yield of
97%. The yellow crystalline solid of 1 was achieved by the
reaction of the Schiff base ligand with ZnCl2 and Nd(OAc)3·
4H2O in a EtOH/MeOH solution. As shown in Figure 1, two
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
■
Synthesis of the Schiff Base Ligand H2L. To a 15 mL
EtOH solution of 2-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde (20.0
mmol, 3.04 g), 1,1′-binaphthyl-2,2′-diamine (10.0 mmol, 2.84
g) in 20 mL of EtOH was added slowly in 20 min. The mixture
was heated for 3.5 h under reflux with stirring. It was cooled to
room temperature to give a yellow solid product, which was
then filtered, washed three times using 5 mL of ethanol, and
dried overnight in air. Yield: (calculated from 1,1′-binaphthyl-
2,2′-diamine): 5.3607 g (97%). EA: Found: C, 78.31%; H,
5.13%; N, 5.12%. Calcd for C36H28N2O4: C, 78.24%; H,
1
5.11%; N, 5.07%. H NMR (CD3Cl3, 500 MHz): 12.18 (2H),
8.46 (2H), 7.85 (4H), 7.42 (2H), 7.27 (2H), 7.09 (2H), 7.03
(2H), 6.63 (2H), 3.63 (6H). IR (KBr, cm−1): 1613 (w), 1458
(m), 1251 (s), 1074 (m), 982 (s), 814 (s), 742 (s), 629 (s).
Synthesis of [Zn2NdL2(OAc)2]·OH (1). To a 20 mL MeOH
solution of ZnCl2 (0.20 mmol, 0.0272 g), Nd(OAc)3·4H2O
(0.20 mmol, 0.0642 g), and H2L (0.20 mmol, 0.1104 g),
triethylamine in 1 mL of a EtOH solution (1.0 mol/L) was
added. The mixture was heated for 3 h under reflux with
stirring. A clear solution was obtained after filtration, and slow
diffusion of ether into the solution for 2 weeks gave a yellow
crystalline product of 1. Yield (calculated from ZnCl2): 0.0778
g (49%). EA: Found: C, 58.52; H, 4.51; N, 3.34%. Calcd for
C78H66N4NdO17Zn2: C, 58.32; H, 4.14; N, 3.49%. IR (KBr,
cm−1): 1616 (s), 1543 (s), 1436 (s), 1233 (s), 1195 (s), 1075
(m), 972 (s), 701 (s), 659 (s). mp > 179.85 °C (decompose).
Synthesis of [Cd3Sm3L3(OAc)6(OH)3] (2). The synthesis
process of 2 was the same as that of 1 with the use of
Cd(NO3)2·4H2O (0.20 mmol, 0.0472 g), Sm(OAc)3·6H2O
(0.20 mmol, 0.0654 g), and H2L (0.20 mmol, 0.1104 g). Yield:
0.0713 g (35%). EA: Found: C, 49.51; H, 3.76; N, 2.87%.
Calcd for C123H111Cd3N6O31Sm3: C, 49.95; H, 3.78; N, 2.84%.
IR (KBr, cm−1): 1609 (s), 1386 (s), 1212 (m), 1071 (m), 966
(m), 748 (w), 624 (m). mp > 172.83 °C (decompose).
X-ray Single Crystal Diffraction. A Smart APEX CCD
diffractometer (Mo Kα radiation) was employed for the
collection of X-ray data of the single crystals. The crystal
structures of 1 and 2 have been solved by SHELX 97 program
using a direct method.33 SADABS program was used for the
empirical absorption correction. Non-hydrogen atoms were
refined anisotropically and located from trial structures, and
hydrogen atoms were calculated by geometrical methods and
Figure 1. Structure of the trinuclear Zn−Nd complex 1 (Zn2+: green;
Nd3+: blue).
Zn(II) ions have a square-based pyramidal geometry, located
in the inner N2O2 cavities of two L2− ligands. The Nd(III) ion
is ten-coordinated and shows a coordination geometry of
bicapped tetragonal antiprism, bound to the O2O2 donor sets
of two L2− ligands. The Nd(III) and Zn(II) ions are linked
together through two OAc− anions and four phenolic oxygen
atoms of the L2− ligands. The average Zn(II)···Nd(III)
distance is 3.542 Å. In 1, each Schiff base ligand coordinates
with one Zn(II) and one Nd(III) and displays a coordination
mode of μ2(η1:η2:η1:η1:η2:η1), while the OAc− anion exhibits a
μ2 coordination mode with the metals. The bond lengths of
Nd−O, Zn−N, and Zn−O in the structures are 2.400−2.880,
1.980−2.130, and 1.980−2.080 Å, respectively.
The formation of d-4f complexes depends on the d-metal
ions used, and the reaction of Schiff base ligand with
Sm(OAc)3·6H2O and Cd(NO3)2·4H2O gave 2 under the
same experimental conditions as above. The hexanuclear Cd−
Sm complex 2 shows an interesting triangular structure, which
has a C3 symmetry axis through the center of the molecule
(Figure 2). Different from those in 1, two benzene rings of the
L2− ligand are more distorted in 2. Thus, the L2− ligand can
coordinate with three metal ions (one Cd(II) and two
Sm(III)), resulting in a coordination mode of
252
J. Phys. Chem. A 2021, 125, 251−257