Phytase from Aspergillus niger
TN Mandviwala and JM Khire
242
2 Al-Asheh S and Z Duvnjak. 1995. Phytase production and decrease
of phytic acid content in canola meal by Aspergillus carbonarius in
solid-state fermentation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 11: 228–231.
3 Babu KR and T Satyanarayana. 1995. ␣-Amylase production by ther-
mophilic Bacillus coagulans in solid state fermentation. Proc Biochem
30: 305–309.
4 Bindu S, D Somashekar and R Joseph. 1998. A comparative study
on permeabilization treatments for in situ determination of phytase of
Rhodotorula gracillis. Appl Microbiol Lett 27: 336–340.
5 Blix G. 1948. The determination of hexosamine according to Elson
and Morgan. Acta Chem Scand 2: 467–473.
6 Dvorakova J. 1998. Phytase: sources, preparation and exploitation.
Folia Microbiol 43: 323–338.
7 Ebune A, S Al-Asheh and Z Duvnjak. 1995. Effects of phosphate,
surfactants and glucose on phytase production and hydrolysis of phytic
acid in canola meal by Aspergillus ficuum during solid state fermen-
tation. Biores Technol 54: 241–247.
soybean meal. They found that 10 mg phosphate per 100 g
substrate in the growth medium resulted in high phytase
activity (82.5 U g−1 substrate) compared to a control with-
out added phosphate (8.0 U g−1 substrate) while higher
phosphate levels inhibited phytase production.
The use of a surfactant during SSF gave higher phytase
activity. Maximum phytase activity (108 U g−1 DMB) was
obtained when Triton X-100 at 0.5% (w/w) was used.
Ebune et al [7] also showed increased phytase production
by addition of sodium oleate and Tween-80 during SSF of
canola meal by A. ficuum while Triton X-100 had a nega-
tive effect. In the case of phytase production by A. car-
bonarius [1] using canola meal as substrate for SSF,
sodium oleate and Tween-80 (each at 0.5%) showed a
higher rate of biomass and phytase production than the con-
trol which did not contain surfactants. Increased phytase
production may be explained by an effect of the surfactant
on cell permeability. However, it is also possibile that the
surfactant in lower concentration stimulated growth, as in
the case of phytase production by A. carbonarius [1].
8 Erdman JW and A Poneros-Schneier. 1989. Phytic acid interactions
with divalent cations in food and in the gastrointestinial tract. Adv
Exp Med Biol 249: 167–171.
9 Feniksova RV, AS Tikhomrova and BE Rakhleeva. 1960. Conditions
for forming amylase and proteinase in surface culture of Bacillus subt-
ilis. Mikrobilogica 29: 745–748.
10 Fox MRS and SH Tao. 1989. Antinutritive effects of phytate and other
phosphorylated derivatives. Nutr Toxicol 3: 59–96.
11 Greiner R, U Konietzny and K-D Jany. 1993. Purification and charac-
terization of two phytases from Escherichia coli. Arch Biochem
Biophys 303: 107–113.
12 Ha NC, YO Kim and BH Oh. 1999. Preliminary X-ray crystallographic
analysis of a novel phytase from a Bacillus amyloliquifaciens strain.
Acta Crystallographia Section D-Biological Crystallography 55:
691–693.
13 Han YM and XG Lei. 1999. Role of glycosylation in the functional
expression of an Aspergillus niger phytase (PhyA) in Pichia pastoris.
Arch Biochem Biophys 364: 83–90.
14 Han YM, DB Wilson and XG Lei. 1999. Expression of an Aspergillus
niger phytase gene (PhyA) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ
Microbiol 65: 1915–1918.
Enzymatic properties
Most isolated phytases are active within the pH range 4.5–
6.0 and the stability of enzyme activity is decreased dra-
matically by pH values lower than 3 or higher than 7.5
[23]. However, the phytases from Enterobacter, mungbean
and Lilium longiflorum (pollen) have pH optima around 7.5.
The enzymes isolated from animal tissues also have alka-
line optimum pH values. This wide range of pH optima
could be reflected in the molecular structure or the stereo
specificity of the enzyme from different sources. Phytases
show high activity in the temperature range of 50–70°C but
optimum temperatures for the enzyme are mainly between
45° and 60°C [23]. The optimum temperature of the spelt
phytase is 45°C which is the lowest optimal temperature
recorded.
15 Han YM, DJ Gallagher and AG Wilfred. 1987. Phytase production by
Aspergillus ficuum on semisolid substrate. J Ind Microbiol 2: 195–200.
16 Haug W and H Lantzsch. 1983. Sensitive method for the rapid determi-
nation of phytate in cereal and cereal products. J Sci Food Agric 34:
1423–1426.
17 Heinohen JK and RJ Lahti. 1981. A new and convenient colorimetric
determination of inorganic orthophosphate and its application to the
assay to inorganic pyrophosphatase. Anal Biochem 113: 313–317.
18 Hirabayashi M, T Matsui and H Yano. 1998. Fermentation of soyabean
flour with Aspergillus usamii improves availabilities of zinc and iron
in rats. J Nutritional Science and Vitaminology 44: 877–886.
19 Howson SJ and RP Davis. 1983. Production of phytase hydrolyzing
enzyme by some fungi. Enz Microbiol Technol 5: 377–382.
20 Irving GCJ. 1980. Inositol Phosphates: Their Chemistry, Biochemistry
and Physiology (Cosgrove DJ, ed), pp 85–98, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
21 Kerovuo J, M Lauraeus, P Nurminen, N Kalkkinen and J Apajalahti.
1998. Isolation, characterization, molecular genecloning and sequen-
cing of a novel phytase from Bacillus subtilis. Appl Environ Microbiol
64: 2079–2085.
Scanning electron microscopy
The degree of substrate transformation in SSF depends
upon the capability of fungal mycelia to penetrate deep into
the intracellular and intercellular spaces [29]. In the present
study we have observed that A. niger attacks wheat bran
particles rapidly and forms a full mat growth with spores on
wheat bran particles which was necessary for high phytase
activity as biomass was related to phytase activity.
Further work on purification and characterization of phy-
tase enzyme is in progress.
22 Kim YO, HK Kim, KS Bae, JH Yu and TK Oh. 1998. Purification
and properties of a thermostable phytase from Bacillus sp DS-11.
Biotechnol Appl Microbiol 22: 2–7.
Acknowledgements
23 Liu BL, A Rafiq, YM Tzeng and A Rob. 1998. The induction and
characterization of phytase and beyond. Enz Microbiol Chem 22:
415–424.
24 Lonsane BK, NP Ghildyal, S Budaitman and SV Ramakrishna. 1985.
Engineering aspects of solid state fermentation. Enzyme Microb Tech-
nol 7: 258–265.
25 Lonsane BK, G Saucedo-Castenada, M Raimbault, S Roussos, G Vini-
egra-Gonzalez, NP Ghildyal, M Ramakrishna and MM Krishnaiah.
1992. Scale-up strategies for solid state fermentation systems. Proc
Biochem 27: 259–273.
We are grateful to SR Sainkar, Special Instruments Lab,
National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, India, for his help in
carrying out the SEM studies. Financial assistance to TN
Mandviwala (SRF) from CSIR, New Delhi, India is grate-
fully acknowledged.
References
26 Maga JA. 1982. Phytate: its chemistry, occurrence, food interactions,
nutritional significance, and methods of analysis. J Agric Food Chem
30: 1–9.
1 Al-Asheh S and Z Duvnjak. 1994. The effect of surfactants on the
phytase production and the reduction of the phytic acid in canola meal
by Aspergillus carbonarius during a solid state fermentation process.
Biotechnol Lett 2: 183–188.
27 Nair VC and Z Duvnjak. 1990. Reduction of phytic acid content in
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology