Chemistry Letters 2000
467
tio-pure [Fe(bpy)3]2+,11,13 which indicated that the glycoconju-
gate metal complexes were mixtures of Λ- and ∆-stereoisomers.
The two stereoisomers in each glycoconjugate were sepa-
rated by reverse-phase HPLC on a CrestPak C18T-5 analytical
column using a linear gradient of acetonitrile and an aqueous
0.1 M ammonium acetate solution. The major and minor peaks
of [Fe(α-Glc-3-bpy)3]Cl2 were assigned, respectively, to Λ- and
∆-isomer on the basis of their CD spectra. The Λ-∆ ratio esti-
mated from their integration was 73:27. The rather high
diastereo-excess (46% de) was in accordance with that estimat-
1
ed by H-NMR spectrum. Nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE)
1
was detected between the phenyl and bipyridyl protons in H-
NMR spectrum of [Fe(α-Glc-3-bpy)3]Cl2 in D2O. We assume
that the hydrophobic interaction between the phenyl and
bipyridyl moieties separating with the flexible alkyl spacer may
result in a compactly packed conformation of the complex in
water. The resultant proximity of the chiral saccharide units to
the complex center may account for the high diastereo-selectiv-
ity of the complexes.
(ICmin ≥ 1 × 10-1 M). The enhanced specific interaction of
[Fe(α-Glc-3-bpy)3]Cl2 for ConA may arise from hexavalent α-
glucoside assembly and hydrophobic phenyl aglycon. In addi-
tion, their saccharide moieties may be induced-fit to the binding
site of ConA, because of the flexibility of alkyl spacer.
In conclusion, hexavalency, hydrophobicity, and flexibility
of the glycosignals on metal complexes play a substantial role
in enhancement of diastereo-selectivities and affinities for
lectins. These properties will be advantageous for high-sensi-
tive monitoring of various saccharide recognition phenomena.
References and Notes
1
R. A. Dwek, Chem. Rev., 96, 683 (1996).
2
M. Mammen, S.-K. Choi, and J. M. Whitesides, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 37, 2754 (1998).
3
4
L. L. Kiessling and N. L. Pohl, Chem. Biol., 3, 71 (1996).
S. Nishimura and Y. C. Lee, “Polysaccharide : Structural
Diversity and Functional Versatility,” ed by S. Dumutriu,
Ed.; Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (1998), p. 523.
N. V. Bovin and H.-J. Gabius, Chem. Soc. Rev., 24, 413
(1995).
T. Akasaka, K. Matsuura, N. Emi, and K. Kobayashi,
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 260, 323 (1999).
H. Dohi, Y. Nishida, M. Mizuno, M. Shinkai, T.
Kobayashi, T. Takeda, H. Uzawa, and K. Kobayashi,
Bioorg. Med. Chem., 7, 2053 (1999).
5
6
7
8
9
T. Hasegawa, S. Kondoh, K. Matsuura, and K. Kobayashi,
Macromolecules, 32, 6595 (1999).
A. Yashiro, Y. Nishida, M. Ohno, S. Eguchi, and K.
Kobayashi, Tetrahedron Lett., 39, 9031 (1998).
Binding affinity of the conjugates was investigated by inhi-
bition of lectin-induced hemagglutination14 using ConA (con-
canavalin A from jack bean, α-Glc specific) and RCA120
(Ricinus communis agglutinin from castor bean, β-Gal specific).
Table 1 summarizes the minimum inhibition concentrations per
saccharide residue (ICmin). [Fe(α-Glc-3-bpy)3]Cl2 was a
stronger inhibitor for ConA-induced hemagglutination than D-
glucose and α−Glc-pNP by about 1000- and 100-fold, respec-
10 P. D. Beer, Acc. Chem. Res., 31, 71 (1998).
11 S. Sakai and T. Sasaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116, 1587
(1994).
12 S. Sakai, Y. Shigemasa, and T. Sasaki, Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn., 72, 1313 (1999).
13 S. J. Milder, J. S. Gold, and D. S. Kliger, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 108, 8295 (1986).
tively. [Fe(β-Glc-3-bpy)3]Cl2 was less potent inhibitor. RCA120
-
14 I. J. Goldstein and C. H. Hayes, Adv. Carbohydr. Chem.
Biochem., 35, 127 (1978).
induced hemagglutination was not inhibited by these conjugates