A. Caubet et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 669 (2003) 164ꢂ
/171
169
Avance-500DMX or a Varian-VXR500 instrument
using the same solvents and references as mentioned
above. The 195Pt{1H}-NMR spectra of 3a and 3b were
obtained with a Bruker-DXR-250 instrument and the
chemical shifts given are referred to a H2[PtCl6] solution
in D2O as external reference. The 31P{1H}-NMR
spectrum of 3b was obtained with a Bruker -DXR-250
instrument using CDCl3 as solvent and P(OMe)3 as
20 8C) for ca. 10 min. The resulting yellow solution
was concentrated to ca. 2 ml on a rotary evaporator,
and then treated with n-hexane. The yellow solid formed
was filtered out, washed with n-hexane, air-dried and
then dried in vacuum for 24 h (yield: 79 mg, 83%).
Characterisation data: Anal. Calc. for: C32H27NClPPtS×
0.5CH2Cl2 (Found): C, 51.25 (51.35); H, 3.78 (3.85), N,
1.84 (2.00) and S, 4.21 (4.43)%. MS (FABꢃ): m/zꢁ
652
{Mꢀ(Cl)ꢀ IR: n(ꢂCꢁNꢀ)ꢁ1590
(0.5CH2Cl2)}ꢃ.
cmꢀ1. H-NMR data (500 MHz): 10.68 [d, 1H, ꢀ
CHꢁ
SMe],
7.3], 6.67 [t, 1H, H4, 3J(Hꢀ
/
/
reference [d31P{P(OMe)3}ꢁ
/140.17 ppm]. In all cases
/
/
/
/
/
1
the chemical shifts (d) are given in ppm and the coupling
constants (J) in Hz. The assignments of the signals
/
/
3
3
Nꢀ
6.40 [d, 1H, H3, 3J(Hꢀ
H)ꢁ
7.2], 7.13 [t, 1H, H5, J(Hꢀ
/
, J(Hꢀ
/
Pt)ꢁ
/
63, J(Hꢀ
/
Pt)ꢁ
/
9], 2.13 [s, 3H, ꢀ
/
1
detected in the H- and 13C-NMR spectra were carried
/
H)ꢁ
/
/
3
out with the aid of two-dimensional NMR experiments.
vis spectra of 2a and 2b in CH2Cl2 were
/
/
H)ꢁ7.3], 8.18 [d, 1H,
/
3
3
The UVꢂ
/
H3?, J(Hꢀ
5.12 [s, 1H, CH2Cl2] and 6.40ꢂ
and aromatic protons of the PPh3 ligand). 13C{1H}-
NMR data: 177.0 (ꢀCHꢁNꢀ), 28.0 (ꢀ
SMe), 152.2 [C1,
3J(Cꢀ 7], 136.7 [C2, 1J(Cꢀ 85, 2J(Cꢀ
P)ꢁ Pt)ꢁ P)ꢁ
/
H)ꢁ
/
7.3], 8.80 [d, 1H, H6?, J(Hꢀ
7.90 [m, 20H, H4?, H5?
/
H)ꢁ
/
7.3],
recorded at 298 K with a SHIMADZU-160A spectro-
photometer and an AMINCO-BOWMAN spectro-
fluorimeter was used to obtain the luminescence
spectrum of 10ꢀ4 M solutions of 2a and 2b in CH2Cl2
at 298 K.
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
5
Hz], 128.4 (C3), 134.1 (C4), 133.0 (C5), 130.1 (C6),
148.3 (C1?), 134.7 (C2?), 122.2 (C3?), 126.5 (C4?), 132.7
(C6?) and four additional doublets centred at ca. 134.4,
131.6, 131.1 and 128.7 ppm due to the four types of
carbon nuclei of the aromatic rings of the PPh3 ligand.
4.1.1. Preparation of [Pt{C6H4ꢀ
SMe)}Cl] (2b)
Cis-[PtCl2(PhCN)2] (100 mg, 2.1ꢄ
suspended in 20 cm3 of toluene and refluxed until
complete dissolution. Then, the ligand (48 mg, 2.1ꢄ
/
CHꢁ
/
Nꢀ
/
(C6H4ꢀ/2-
/
10ꢀ4 mol) was
31P{1H}-NMR data: 19.34 [1J(Pꢀ
195Pt{1H}-NMR data: ꢀ4461 [1J(Ptꢀ
/
Pt)ꢁ
/
3857.6 Hz].
3858].
/
/
/
P)ꢁ
/
10ꢀ4 mol) was added and the mixture was refluxed for
3 h. The resulting solution was filtered and the brown
filtrate was concentrated to ca. 5 cm3 on a rotary
evaporator. The brown solid formed was collected by
filtration and air-dried. (Yield: 30 mg, 31%). Character-
isation data: Anal. Calc. for: C14H12NClPtS (Found): C,
36.81 (37.03); H, 2.64 (2.60), N, 3.07 (2.99) and S, 7.02
4.2. Crystallography
A brown crystal of [Pt{C6H4ꢀ
/
CHꢁ
/
Nꢀ
/
(C6H4ꢀ/2-
SMe)}Cl] (2b) was selected and mounted on a EN-
RAF-Nonius CAD 4 four circle diffractometer. Unit
cell parameter were determined from automatic centring
(6.73)%. MS (FABꢃ): m/zꢁ
n(ꢂCꢁNꢀ)ꢁ
1588 cmꢀ1. UVꢂ
dm3 molꢀ1 cm2)ꢁ
346 (7540); 363 (7846), 431 sh (1347),
466 (1971) and 492 sh (1670). H-NMR data: 2.95 [s,
3H, ꢀ H)ꢁ20], 8.98 [s, 1H, ꢀCHꢁNꢀ
SMe, 3J(Ptꢀ
3J(Ptꢀ 131], 7.47 [d, 1H, H3, J(Hꢀ
H)ꢁ 7.5], 7.35
[t, 1H, H4, 3J(Hꢀ 7.5], 7.51 [t, 1H, H5, 3J(Hꢀ
H)ꢁ H)ꢁ
7.5], 7.67 [dd, 1H, H6, J(Hꢀ
H)ꢁ1.5],
7.75 [d, 1H, H3?, 3J(Hꢀ 7.5], 7.12 [td, 1H, H4?,
H)ꢁ
3J(Hꢀ 7.5, 4J(Hꢀ 1.5], 7.46 [t, 1H, H5?, 3J(Hꢀ
H)ꢁ H)ꢁ
H)ꢁ
7.5] and 7.87 [dd, 1H, H6?, J(Hꢀ
H)ꢁ Pt)ꢁ
1.5, 3J(Hꢀ 41]. 13C{1H}-NMR data: 169.2
(ꢀCHꢁNꢀ), 26.8 (ꢀ
SMe), 148.5 (C1), 130.8 (C3), 134.0
/
421 {Mꢀ
/
(Cl)}ꢃ. IR:
of 25 reflections (in the range 12B
by least-squares method. Intensities were collected with
a graphite monochromatised MoꢂKa radiation using
v ꢂ2U scan-technique. The number of reflections mea-
sured in the range 2.435U 529.988 was 4116, of which
3912 were non-equivalent by symmetry {Rint (on I)ꢁ
0.043} and the number of reflections assumed as
observed, applying the condition I ꢁ2s(I), was 3068.
/
U B218) and refined
/
/
/
/
/
vis data: l (nm) (o in
/
/
1
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
,
/
/
3
/
/
/
H)ꢁ
/
/
/
/
/
/
3
4
/
H)ꢁ
/
7.5, J(Hꢀ
/
/
/
/
/
Three reflections were measured every 2 h as orientation
and intensity control, but no significant intensity decay
was observed. Lorentz-polarisation corrections were
made, but absorption corrections were not.
The structure was solved by Direct methods, using the
SHELXS computer program [28] and refined by full-
matrix least-squares method with the SHELX-97 compu-
ter program [29] using 3912 reflections (very negative
intensities were not assumed). The function minimised
/
/
/
/
/
3
4
/
/
H)ꢁ
/
7.5, J(Hꢀ
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
(C4), 131.0 (C5), 135.1 (C6), 155.8 (C1?), 118.1 (C3?),
125.1 (C4?), 131.2(C5?) and 132.6 (C6?), the signals due to
the C2 and C2? atoms were not detected in the 13C{1H}-
NMR spectrum. 195Pt{1H}-NMR data: ꢀ
3708.
/
2
2 2
was SwjjFoj ꢀ
/
jFcj j , where wꢁ
/
[s2(I)ꢃ
/
(0.0684P)2ꢃ
/
2
2
4.1.2. Preparation of [Pt{C6H4ꢀ
SMe)}Cl(PPh3)] (3b)
Complex 2b (60 mg, 1.3ꢄ
10 ml of CH2Cl2 then the stoichiometric amount of PPh3
(34 mg, 1.3ꢄ
10ꢀ4 mol) was added. The reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature (r.t.) (ca.
/
CHꢁ
/
Nꢀ
/
(C6H4ꢀ/2-
0.3429P]ꢀ1 and Pꢁ
/
(jFoj ꢃ2jFcj )/3; f, f? and fƒ were
/
obtained from the literature [30]. All hydrogen atoms
were computed and refined with an overall isotropic
temperature factor using a riding model. The final R(on
F) factor was 0.041, wR(on F2)ꢁ
/
10ꢀ4 mol) was dissolved in
/
/
0.101 and the good-
ness-of-fit was 1.048 for all the observed reflections. The