A R T I C L E S
Mizanur et al.
type and engineered variants of R-D-glucopyranosyl phosphate
thymidylyltransferase (also known as Ep) from the bacteria
Salmonella enterica, LT 2.2a,3 The wild-type enzyme and a
number of its mutants have been used for the synthesis of NDP
sugar libraries with high enzyme concentrations (3.5 units; a
unit is defined as the amount of enzyme needed to produce one
micromole of nucleotidediphospho sugar per minute).2a Al-
though no kinetic studies have been carried out with this
Salmonella enzyme with any non-natural substrates, our results
with a related enzyme from Escherichia coli6 suggest that
substrate binding affinity differences are not the major problem,
and high enzyme concentrations are necessary to override the
limited turnover of non-natural substrates. Expansion and
diversification of both natural and non-natural NDP sugar
libraries still await the discovery of enzymes with wide glycosyl
phosphate acceptability, ideally without the introduction of
mutations or active site engineering and with a tolerance of
robust working conditions. The study of sugar nucleotidyltrans-
ferase has also attracted interest for their potential as antibiotic
targets.7 For example, UDP-glucose, synthesized by UDP-R-
D-glucose pyrophosphorylases (UDPG-PPases), has a number
of vital cellular functions, including the synthesis of glycogen,8
the synthesis of the carbohydrate moiety of glycolipids,9
glycoproteins,10 and proteoglycans,11 the entry of galactose into
glycolysis,12 the synthesis of UDP-glucuronic acid,13 and the
pathogenesis of a number of bacteria.14
archaea. The amino acid sequence of a putative archaea UDP-
R-D-glucose pyrophosphorylase (UTP: R-D-glucose-1-phosphate
uridylyltransferase, EC 2.7.7.9) from P. furiosus DSM 3638 was
compared to related bacterial and eukaryotic sequences using
furiosus was chosen as a representative archaea because a large
structural proteomics effort centered on this extremophile
promises protein data to match biochemical studies.18 Pairwise
alignment of the enzyme showed a high degree of residue
identity between archaea and bacteria ranging from 40 to 51%.
Sixty-two residues are strictly conserved among UDPG-PPases
from a variety of evolutionary diverse organisms. Among the
conserved residues, glycine is the most abundant, followed by
glutamate, lysine, and proline. However, among the amino acids
of P. furiosus UDPG-PPase, glutamate is the most prominent,
followed by leucine, isoleucine, lysine, and glycine. The
percentage of Glu and Lys increased in the hyperthermophilic
proteomes, and the percent of Gln and His decreased, so that
(Glu + Lys)/(Gln + His) is greater than 4.5.19 This ratio for
the P. furiosus UDPG-PPase is 4.8, which would predict
thermostability. A single motif can be clearly identified at
alignment position 5-30 (Figure S4 of the Supporting Informa-
tion), which is in the N-terminal position of the enzyme. All
other conserved residues are distributed throughout the sequence.
Amino acid sequence alignments among the UDPG-PPases from
Saccharomyces cereVisiae, E. coli, and P. furiosus were also
done using BLAST. As shown in Figure 2, 38% overall
sequence identity was found between the E. coli and P. furiosus
enzymes (Figure 2). In contrast, the archaeal enzyme showed
no sequence similarity with the yeast enzyme. Therefore, the
archaea enzyme could be expected to have significantly different
properties than the related bacterial and eukaryotic enzymes and
thereby could be a good target for exploring its potential for
chemoenzymatic synthetic strategies.
To assess the potential of archaeal proteins in the synthesis
of sugar nucleotides, this open reading frame predicted to encode
the P. furiosus UDPG-PPase (852 base pairs) was amplified
by PCR and cloned into a pET21a vector for expression of the
protein in E. coli cells with a hexahistidine tag at the C-terminus.
To purify the enzyme, the cells were lysed by sonication, heat-
treated to denature native E. coli proteins, and centrifuged. The
resulting cell-free extract was passed through a Ni-affinity
column and eluted with imidazole buffer. SDS-PAGE analysis
of the purified enzyme showed a protein with an apparent
molecular mass of 36 kDa (see the Supporting Information),
which was in good agreement with the calculated molecular
mass of the gene product (31.2 kDa). The enzyme was used
directly for determination of its activity and substrate specificity
or stored at -20 °C as a glycerol stock solution for future use
with little loss of activity after 90 days.
Results and Discussion
Preparation of an Archaeal Sugar Nucleotidyltransferase.
To date, UDPG-PPase has been isolated and characterized from
both eukaryotic15 and prokaryotic16 sources. On the basis of
sequence similarities, UDPG-PPases have been classified into
two groups despite their similar catalytic properties: the
prokaryotic enzymes with about 300 amino acids residues and
the eukaryotic enzymes with about 500 amino acids residues.17
Surprisingly, no study has been conducted so far on sugar
nucleotidyltransferases from the third class of living beings,
(6) Zea, C. J.; Pohl, N. L. Anal. Biochem. 2004, 328, 196-202.
(7) (a) Brown, K.; Pompeo, F.; Dixon, S.; Mengin-Lecreulx, D.; Cambillau,
C.; Bourne, Y. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 4096-4107. (b) Blankenfeldt, W.;
Asuncion, M.; Lam, J. S.; Naismith, J. H. EMBO J. 2000, 19, 6652-6663.
(c) Sulzenbacher, G.; Gal, L.; Peneff, C.; Fassy, F.; Bourne, Y. J. Biol.
Chem. 2001, 276, 11844-11851.
(8) (a) Alonso, M. D.; Lomako, W. M.; Whelan, W. J. FASEB J. 1995, 9,
1126-1137. (b) Hellerstein, M. K.; Letscher, A.; Schwarz, J. M.; Ce´sar,
D.; Shackleton, C. H. L.; Turner, S.; Neese, R.; Wu, K.; Bock, S.; Kaempfer,
S. A. J. Physiol. 1997, 272, E155-E162.
(9) Sandhoff, K.; van Echten, G.; Schro¨der, M.; Schnabel, D.; Suzuki, K.
Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1992, 20, 695-699.
(10) (a)Verbert, A. Glycoproteins; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1995; pp145-152.
(b) Roth, J. Glycoproteins; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1995; pp 287-312.
(11) Silbert, J. E.; Sugumaran, G. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1995, 1241, 371-
384.
(12) Frey, P. A. FASEB J. 1996, 10, 461-470.
(13) (a) Aw, T. Y.; Jones, D. P. Anal. Biochem. 1982, 127, 32-36. (b) Aw, T.
Y.; Jones, D. P. Biochem. J. 1984, 219, 707-712.
Enzymatic Analysis. The difficulty of assays, such as those
based on HPLC,20 needed to measure sugar nucleotidyltrans-
ferase activity with non-natural substrates has been a significant
deterrent to kinetic studies. Our recent development of an
electrospray ionization mass spectrometry assay has significantly
shortened the analysis time, and since it is not substrate-specific,
(14) (a) Chang, H. Y.; Deng, W. L.; Lee, J. H.; Fu, T. F.; Peng, H. L. Microb.
Pathog. 1996, 20, 255-261. (b) Crater, D. J.; Van de Rijn, I. J. Biol. Chem.
1995, 270, 18452-18458.
(15) (a) Hansen, R. G.; Albrecht, G. J.; Bass, S. T.; Seifert, L. L. Methods
Enzymol. 1966, 8, 248-253. (b) Gustafson, G. L.; Gander, J. E. J. Biol.
Chem. 1972, 247, 1387-1397. (c) Pannbacker, R. G. Biochemistry 1967,
6, 1287-1293. (d) Villar-Palasi, C.; Larner, J. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
1960, 86, 61-66.
(16) (a) Kamogawa, A.; Kurahashi, K. J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 1965, 57, 758-
765. (b) Nikae, T.; Nikaido, H. J. Biol. Chem. 1971, 246, 4386-4396. (c)
Nikae, T.; Nikaido, H. J. Biol. Chem. 1971, 246, 4397-4403. (d) Hossain,
S. A.; Tanizawa, K.; Kazuta, Y.; Fukui, T. J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 1994, 115,
965-972.
(17) Weissborn, A. C.; Liu, Q.; Ruimley, M. K.; Kennedy, E. P. J. Bacteriol.
1994, 176, 2611-2618.
(18) Adams, M. W. W.; Dailey, H. A.; DeLucas, L. J.; Luo, M.; Prestegaard, J.
H.; Rose, J. P.; Wang, B.-C. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 191-198.
(19) Farias, S. T.; Bonato, M. C. M. Genet. Mol. Res. 2003, 2, 383-393.
(20) (a) Lazarowski, E. R.; Harden, T. K. J. Pharmacol. 1999, 127, 1272-
1278. (b) Jiang, J.; Biggins, J. B.; Thorson, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2001, 40, 1502-1505.
9
15994 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 49, 2004