S.-H. Yoon, J. F. Robyt / Carbohydrate Research 341 (2006) 210–217
217
study, then bind adjacent to the covalent, enzyme–
maltohexaosyl unit, so that the C-4-OH of the glucoside
makes a nucleophilic, SN2 attack onto C-1 of the malto-
hexanoyl unit, giving an a-(1!4) linkage and the forma-
tion of a maltoheptaose glycoside. This first product
then undergoes a CGTase catalyzed disproportionation
reaction between two maltoheptaose glycoside mole-
cules to eventually give a series of large and small mal-
todextrin glycosides.1,4,5 At low molar ratios, the large
maltodextrin glycosides are substrates for the formation
of the higher cyclomaltodextrins, CD7 and CD8. At
higher molar ratios, the large maltodextrin glycosides
decrease and hence the formation of the cyclomaltodext-
rins also decreases. It should be noted that for B. macer-
ans CGTase, CD6 is the preferred donor in the coupling
reactions, and CD7 and CD8 are very poor donors.7
The formation of the glycosides of the maltodextrins
gives a more stable material than maltodextrins in that
the most reactive group in the maltodextrins is the hemi-
acetal, reducing end that can undergo a variety of reac-
tions, such as oxidation, reduction, isomerization,
derivatization, and so forth. The formation of the glyco-
sides fixes the hemiacetal into an acetal with a specific a
or b configuration that cannot undergo anomerization
or other reactions. In different applications, the a or b
anomers could each have advantages. The a anomer is
more reactive than the b anomer in some kinds of reac-
tions. For example, the a anomer is more easily hydro-
lyzed, whereas the C-2 position of the b anomer is more
reactive than the C-2 position of the a anomer. Some
enzymes can hydrolyze the a anomer but not the b
anomer, and vice versa. Likewise, the methyl and phenyl
aglycone groups could each have their own advantages,
with the methyl group being a small alkyl group and the
phenyl group being a much larger aromatic ring. Pure
individual maltodextrin glycosides can be obtained by
charcoal–Celite column chromatography on a relatively
large, preparative scale.21 Columns as large as
15 cm · 1.5 m, have successfully been used.
4.0–5.0, an enhancement of the smaller sized maltodex-
trin and maltodextrin glycosides with d.p. values of 2
and 3 can be obtained. Further, molar ratios of 0.5–
1.0 gave significant, approximately equal mole percents
of maltodextrin glycosides of d.p. 2–10, for all four types
of the maltodextrin glycosides presented in this study,
along with significant amounts of the higher d.p. malto-
dextrin glycosides with d.p.s 12 and higher.
References
1. French, D. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. 1957, 12, 189–205.
2. Bender, H. Adv. Biotech. Processes 1986, 6, 31–71.
3. French, D.; Levine, M. L.; Norberg, E.; Pazur, J. H.;
Wild, G. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 2387–2390.
4. Norberg, E.; French, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72,
1202–1204.
5. Robyt, J. F. Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry;
Springer: New York, 1998, pp 333–334.
6. Pazur, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 1015–1017.
7. Yoon, S.-H.; Robyt, J. F. Carbohydr. Res. 2002, 337,
2245–2254.
8. Blackwood, A. D.; Bucke, C. Enzyme Microbiol. Technol.
2000, 27, 704–708.
9. Van der Veen, B. A.; Van Alebeek, G.-J. W. M.;
Uitdehaag, J. C. M.; Dijkstra, B. W.; Dijkhuizen, L.
Eur. J. Biochem. 2000, 267, 658–665.
10. Robyt J. F. Strategies for the Specific Labeling of
Amylodextrins. In Biotechnology of Amylodextrin Oligo-
saccharides; Friedman, R. B., Ed.; ACS Symposium
Series; 1991; Vol. 458, pp 98–110.
11. Pazur, J. H.; Marsh, J. M.; Ando, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1959, 81, 2170–2172.
12. Yoon, S.-H.; Robyt, J. F. Carbohydr. Res. 2002, 337, 509–
516.
13. Yoon, S.-H.; Fulton, D. B.; Robyt, J. F. Carbohydr. Res.
2004, 339, 1517–1529.
14. Martin, M. T.; Alcalde, M.; Plou, F. J.; Dijkhuizen, L.;
Ballesteros, A. Biocatal. Biotransform. 2001, 19, 21–35.
15. Kobayashi, S.; Kainuma, K.; Suzuki, S. Carbohydr. Res.
1978, 61, 229–238.
16. Lee, S.-B.; Robyt, J. F. Carbohydr. Res. 2001, 336, 47–53.
17. Thoma, J. A.; Dygert, S.; Hsue, K. Anal. Biochem. 1965,
13, 91–99.
The selection of the proper molar ratios of the reac-
tants in the CGTase synthesis can also afford mixtures
with the enhancement of specifically sized maltodextrin
glycosides. By using molar ratios of 0.5 and lower, a rel-
atively large number of maltodextrins and maltodextrin
glycosides can be obtained, especially those with d.p.
values >10; by using ratios of 1.0–2.0, intermediate sized
maltodextrin and maltodextrin glycosides with d.p. val-
ues 6–9 can be obtained; and by using molar ratios of
18. Fox, J. D.; Robyt, J. F. Anal. Biochem. 1991, 195, 93–
96.
19. Robyt, J. F.; Mukerjea, R. Carbohydr. Res. 1994, 251,
187–202.
20. Robyt, J. F. III. Carbohydrates/Thin-layer (Planar)
Chromatography. In Encyclopedia of Separation Science;
Wilson, I. D., Cooke, M., Poole, C. F., Eds.; Academic
Press: London, 2000; Vol. 5, pp 2235–2244.
21. French, D.; Robyt, J. F.; Weintraub, M.; Knock, P. J. J.
Chromatogr. 1966, 24, 68–72.