548
F. Cecconi et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 6 (2003) 546–548
References
[1] A. Clearfield, in: K.D. Karlin (Ed.), Progress in Inorganic
Chemistry, 47, Wiley, New York, 1998, p. 371.
[2] S. Drumel, V. Penicaud, D. Deniaud, B. Bujoli, Trends Inorg.
Chem. 4 (1996) 13.
[3] A. Cabeza, M.A.G. Aranda, S. Bruque, J. Mater. Chem. 9 (1999)
571, and references therein.
[4] A. Cabeza, M.A.G. Aranda, S. Bruque, J. Mater. Chem. 8 (1998)
2479.
[5] C.V.K. Sharma, A. Clearfield, A. Cabeza, M.A.G. Aranda, S.
Bruque, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2001) 2885.
[6] S. Ayyappan, G. Diaz de Delgado, A.K. Cheetman, G. Ferey,
C.N.R. Rao, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. (1999) 2905.
[7] R. LaDuca, D. Rose, J.R.D. Debord, R.H. Haushalter, C.J.
OÕConnor, J. Zubieta, J. Solid State Chem. 123 (1996) 408, and
references therein.
Fig. 4. Complete packing diagram of [Pb(pcp)] with view normal to
[0 1 0].
[8] B.P. Block, Inorg. Macromol. Rev. 1 (1970) 115.
[9] V. Giancotti, F. Giordano, A. Ripamonti, Makromol. Chem. 120
(1968) 96.
ꢀ
O3 (3.7 A), too large according to the Shannon criterion
[10] P. Colamarino, P.L. Orioli, W.D. Benzinger, H.D. Gillman,
Inorg. Chem. 15 (1976) 800.
for Pb–O interaction [25]. The stereochemical activity
of the lone pair is evidenced also by the distortion
of the square pyramid, the displacement of the lead
[11] R. Cini, P. Colamarino, P.L. Orioli, L.S. Smith, P.R. Newman,
H.D. Gillman, P. Nannelli, Inorg. Chem. 16 (1977) 3223.
[12] S.-J. Liu, R.J. Staples, J.P. Fackler Jr., Polyhedron 11 (1992) 2427.
[13] V. Chandrasekhar, A. Chandrasekaran, R.O. Day, J.M. Holmes,
R.R. Holmes, Phosphorus, Sulfur, Silicon, Relat. Elem. 115 (1996)
125.
ꢀ
from the least-squares basal plane being 0.41 A toward
the void.
As regards the pcp ligand, the P–O distances present
values in perfect agreement with the nature of the
bonds displayed by the ligand itself: as a matter of fact,
while P1–O2, P2–O3 and P2–O4 are all practically
[14] K.W. Oliver, S.J. Rettig, R.C. Thompson, J. Trotter, S. Xia,
Inorg. Chem. 36 (1997) 2465.
[15] D. Grohol, F. Gingl, A. Clearfield, Inorg. Chem. 38 (1999) 751.
[16] M. Shieh, K.J. Martin, P.J. Squattrito, A. Clearfield, Inorg.
Chem. 29 (1990) 958.
ꢀ
equal to 1.50 A (each of these acting as monodentate),
ꢀ
P1–O1 significantly differentiates (1.53 A), as the O1 is
[17] E. Berti, F. Cecconi, C.A. Ghilardi, S. Midollini, A. Orlandini, E.
Pitzalis, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 5 (2002) 1041.
involved in the bonding to two metal atoms. Finally it
is remarkable the aptitude of the pcp ligand to function
as a binegative anion, so that while it balances the
charge of metal(II) cations, it can form neutral com-
plexes and prevent the entry into the lattice of other
counterions. In fact these latter could disturb its pil-
laring action.
[18] D.M. Poojary, B. Zhang, A. Cabeza, M.A.G. Aranda, S. Bruque,
A. Clearfield, J. Mater. Chem. 6 (1996) 639.
[19] J.-G. Mao, Z. Wang, A. Clearfield, Inorg. Chem. 41 (2002) 6106.
[20] J. Farrugia, J. Appl. Cryst. 32 (1999) 837.
[21] A. Altomare, M.C. Burla, M. Camalli, G.L. Cascarano, C.
Giacovazzo, A. Guagliardi, A.G.C. Moliterni, G. Polidori, R.
Spagna, J. Appl. Cryst. 32(1999) 115.
€
[22] G.M. Sheldrick, G. M. University of Gottingen, 1997.
We recall that the unique two previously described
lead(II) phosphinate polymers contain the ligand
monophospinate R2POꢀ2 , respectively with R ¼ Ph [10]
and tBu [13]; their structures consist of polymeric chains
of lead atoms linked by double phosphinate bridges.
[23] M.N. Burnett, C.K. Johnson, Report ORNL-6895. Oak Ridge
National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 1996.
[24] L. Shimoni-Livny, J.P. Glusker, C.W. Bock, Inorg. Chem. 37
(1998) 1853.
[25] R.D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr., Sec. A 32 (1976) 751.