J. S. Tullis et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 1665–1668
1667
Table 3. TNF-a inhibition data for N1 and N3-ethoxymethyl-sub-
stituted pyrimidyl triazole derivatives
Table 3 displays a comparison between N1 and N3-
ethoxymethyl-substituted pyrimidyl triazole inhibitors.
The N3-substituted inhibitors showed better inhibi-
tion than the corresponding N1-substituted analogues,
mirroring the trend observed in the pyridyl triazole
series. The benzylamino pyrimidine triazole 14a
showed good potency(100 nM). An improvement in
inhibitoryactivitywas seen with both of the methyl-
benzylaminopyrimidine triazoles (14b and 14c). Phe-
noxypyrimidine 14d showed good activity, while
substitution of the phenoxygroup with electron-with-
drawing substituents, such as an acetamido group, on
the 3-position increased the potencydramaticallyto
provide one of our most potent inhibitors (14e). The
3-acetamido analogue 14e displayed an excellent phar-
macokinetic profile. We achieved good oral bioavai-
lablity(F=56%) in the rat while maintaining moderate
half-life (t1/2=2.2 h) and clearance (36.5 mL/min/kg)
values. Finally, triazole 14e showed positive oral effi-
XR
N3-substituted IC50
(nM)a
N1-substituted IC50
(nM)a
compd
compd
14a
100
15a
557
14b
14c
14d
14e
46
54
74
8
15b
15c
15d
15e
1602
306
164
189
10
cacy(25 mg/kg) in the rat iodoacetate in-vivo model.
Currently, we are continuing to optimize characteristics
of the triazole inhibitors to provide more in-vivo
activity.
aStandard Deviation for enzyme assays were typically Æ30% of the
mean or less.
by X-ray crystallography. Reaction of chloropyr-
imidines 9–11 with alcohols and amines under either
basic conditions (NaH, THF) or neat amine at elevated
temperature yielded the desired substituted derivatives
(e.g., 12 and 13). In practice, derivatives of 10 proved to
be 1-2 orders of magnitude less active than derivatives
of 9, while limited quantities prevented a systematic
surveyof derivatives of 11. Table 3 summarizes several
promising substituents of types 12 and 13 for the more
potent triazole inhibitors.
We have reported a novel series of pyridyl and pyr-
imidyl triazole TNF-a production inhibitors. Several of
the pyridyl triazole inhibitors showed sub-mM activityin
the LPS-induced TNF-a assay, while the N3-substituted
pyrimidyl triazoles highlighted in Table 3 showed excel-
lent potencyat or below 100 nM. The 3-acetamido-
phenoxy-pyrimidinyl triazole 14e also has shown an
excellent pharmacokinetic profile and was orallyeffica-
cious in the rat iodoacetate model.
All compounds were tested for the inhibition of
TNF-a production using lipopolysaccharide (LPS)
stimulated human monocytic cells (THP-1).7 Table 1,
which compares the three possible sites for substitu-
tion, reveals a general trend in TNF-a IC50 values
that holds for the pyridyl and pyrimidyl triazoles:
N2>N1>N3.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to: Dr. F. C. Wireko and M. R. Mootz
for obtaining X-raycrystal data; Richard L. Bohne for
TNF-a assaydata.
References and Notes
Table 2 summarizes a broad preliminarysurveyof
pyridyl triazole substituents: amides, sulfonamides,
carbamates, ureas, alkyl ethers, and aryl groups. In
general, examples from each substituent class were
found to exhibit modest inhibitoryproperties, even
though the absolute potencies of the inhibitors were
quite sensitive to even minor structural variations.
Methoxyphenyl substituents linked with either a car-
bonyl or sulfonyl group (5a and 5b) showed modest
activity, but removal of the linker altogether resulted in
analogues with activityaround 1 mM (5c and 5d). Far
more pronounced substituent effects were observed for
ureas and alkyl ethers. N-methyl-N-phenyl urea 5g
showed moderate activity, but the closely related analo-
gue 5h lost all TNF-a activity. Similarly, ethoxymethyl
ether 5j showed 500 nM potency, but even min changes
resulted in substantial loss of TNF-a activity(e.g., 5i and
5k). Representing the most active substituent in the pyr-
idyl triazole series, the ethoxymethyl group was then
used for the investigation of the pyrimidyl triazole series.
1. (a) Pearce, G. J.; Chikanza, I. C. BioDrugs 2001, 15, 139.
(b) Moreland, L. W.; Baumgartner, S. W.; Schiff, M. H.; Tin-
dall, E. A.; Fleisenmann, R. M.; Weaver, A. L.; Ettlinger,
R. E.; Cohen, S.; Koupman, W. J.; Mohler, K.; Widmer,
M. B.; Blosch, C. M. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997, 337, 141.
2. (a) Brennan, F. M.; Feldman, M. Curr. Opin. Immunol.
1996, 8, 872. (b) Camussi, G.; Lupia, E. Drugs 1998, 55, 613.
3. Gallagher, T. F.; Fier-Thompson, S. M.; Garigipati, R. S.;
Sorenson, M. E.; Smietana, J. M.; Lee, D.; Bender, P. E.; Lee,
J. C.; Laydon, J. T.; Chabot-Fletcher, M. C.; Breton, J. J.;
Adams, J. L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1995, 5, 1171.
4. (a) Adams, J. L.; Badger, A. M.; Kumar, S. K.; Lee, J. C.
Prog. Med. Chem. 2001, 38, 1. (b) Chakravarty, S.; Dugar, S.
Annual Reports in Med. Chem. 2002, 37, 177.
5. Mangalagiu, I.; Benneche, T.; Undheim, K. Acta Chem.
Scand. 1996, 50, 914.
6. Lam, P. Y. S.; Clark, C. G.; Saubern, S.; Adams, J.; Win-
ters, M. P.; Chan, D. M. T.; Combs, A. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 2941.
7. Duplicate cultures of human monocytic cells (THP-1)8 cells
(2.0Â105/well) were incubated for 15 min in the presence or