Dynamic switching between binding sites in the complexation of macrocyclic 'push-pull' chromophores to lanthanides

Article abstract of DOI:10.1016/j.tet.2009.10.024

The introduction of a 1,3-diacetylpyridine moiety, as an additional binding niche in a macrocyclic receptor ligand containing a conjugated, push-pull malonate functionality, leads to, in addition to the 1:1 binding stoichiometry, the equilibrium formation

Full text of DOI:10.1016/j.tet.2009.10.024

Tetrahedron 65 (2009) 10436–10440
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Tetrahedron
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tet
Dynamic switching between binding sites in the complexation of macrocyclic
‘push–pull’ chromophores to lanthanides
,
a
,
,
Carmine Coluccini a, Dario Pasini a , Pierpaolo Righetti b, Douglas A. Vander Griend b
*
*
a Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Pavia-Viale Taramelli, 10-27100 Pavia, Italy
b Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, MI 49546-4403, USA
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
The introduction of a 1,3-diacetylpyridine moiety, as an additional binding niche in a macrocyclic re-
ceptor ligand containing a conjugated, push–pull malonate functionality, leads to, in addition to the 1:1
binding stoichiometry, the equilibrium formation of multiple complexes, specifically 1:2, 2:1, and 3:1
ligand:metal complexes with lanthanide trications. Various binding modes elicit distinctive responses in
the visible region, which enhance the potential recognition of lanthanide ions. This paper also highlights
the usefulness of a full factor analysis in the elucidation of complex binding phenomena.
Ó 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Received 27 April 2009
Received in revised form
22 September 2009
Accepted 8 October 2009
Available online 13 October 2009
Keywords:
Macrocycles
Lanthanides
Hill equation
‘Push–pull’ chromophores
Factor analysis
Spectrophotometric titration
Sivvu
1. Introduction
of the use of lanthanides in this context is the possibility, given their
high coordination number, of simultaneously coordinating both the
There is a great deal of interest in trivalent lanthanide com-
plexes because of their unique optical properties such as line-like
emission spectra and long luminescence lifetimes. These properties
can be exploited in a wide variety of applications from optical
amplification of lasers1 to in vivo luminescence bioassays.2 The
most successful macrocyclic ligands developed in recent years for
these applications with lanthanide cations are based mainly on
polydentate azamacrocycles with chelating carboxylate arms,
which then encapsulate lanthanide ions with very high stability
constants, but little selectivity.3 Other studies have demonstrated
the possibility of complexing lanthanide ions with polydentate li-
gands such as podands,4 calix[4]arene derivatives,5 or dendrimers.6
These ligands typically avail at least 8–9 hard donor atoms, like O
and N atoms, to fill the first coordination sphere of the ion.
reagent (usually bidentate) and a co-catalyst (both bidentate or
tridentate). 1,3-Dicarbonyl units (either as reagents, malonate de-
rivatives, or catalysts in the form of chiral bisoxazolines) and
1,3-pyridinediacetyl units are amongst the most popular organic
moieties used in this context.7
In this paper, we report on the design, synthesis and complex-
ation of a novel macrocyclic architecture, in which both the above
mentioned moieties are embedded into a covalent cyclic skeleton.
2. Results and discussion
We have recently reported that ‘push–pull’ chromophores, built
around conjugated 1,3-dicarbonyl moieties, behaving as soft li-
gands, are able to form stable complexes in organic solutions with
lanthanides such as Eu3þ, introduced as its triflate salt (Fig. 1).8
More specifically, we have observed the formation of a stable
1:1 Eu(III):ligand complex with compounds 1 and 2 in MeCN so-
lutions. The association constants could be readily ascertained via
spectrophotometric titration as the intramolecular charge transfer
(ICT) band of either ligand redshifts about 100 nm upon complex-
ation with the Eu3þ cation, and clear isosbestic points persist for
the entire range of the titration. The crown ether structure of
Lanthanide ions are also widely used in organic catalysis, func-
tioning as Lewis acids. Their relatively weak coordination to organic
moieties facilitates high turnover numbers. One of the added values
* Corresponding authors. Tel.: þ39 0382 98 7835; fax: þ39 0382 98 7323 (D.P.);
tel.: þ1 616 526 8729; fax: þ1 616 526 6501 (D.A.V.G.).
E-mail addresses: dario.pasini@unipv.it (D. Pasini), dvg@calvin.edu
(D.A. Vander Griend).
0040-4020/$ – see front matter Ó 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.tet.2009.10.024

C. Coluccini et al. / Tetrahedron 65 (2009) 10436–10440
10437
O
O
O
the results with compound 2, no clear isosbestic points exist
throughout the titration range. A close inspection reveals at least
two distinct isosbestic points around 400 nm (404 and 414 nm).
The shift in spectral curves from one isosbestic point to the other
appears to be centered around the addition of one equivalent of
Eu(OTf)3 titrant. This clearly indicates the presence of multiple
equilibria in solution resulting from the introduction within the
crown ether structure of a second binding niche for lanthanide
ions.
The lack of isosbestic points that persist throughout the titration
suggests that there are at least two possible complexes between
ligand and metal. Not surprisingly, modeling the titration profile at
480 nm (see Fig. 2, inset) as a 1:1 binding event gave poor results.
The shape of this profile is sigmoidal, which is not only in-
dicative of multiple equilibria, but also generally associated with
positive cooperativity.12–15 Fitting with the Hill equation (see Table
S1) yields a mathematically safisfactory result: a Hill coefficient of
3.2 and a binding constant of log Ka¼4.0. A profile for the reverse
titration of lanthanide with 3 yields a Hill coefficient of 1.2 and
a binding constant of log Ka¼3.5.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
N
N
N
1
2
3
O
RO
RO
OR
OR
O
O
Ln3+
O
N
N
D-π-A
D-π-A.Ln3+
Figure 1. The compounds used in this study (top), and the mode of binding between
the chromophore and the lanthanide cation (green sphere).
chromophore 2 stabilizes the 1:1 complex with 2 (log Ka¼3.8 Mꢀ1
)
relative to that with 1 (log Ka¼2.6(1) Mꢀ1)9 presumably as a result
of the additional coordination of one of the polyether oxygen
atoms, likely the one belonging to the diglycolyl moiety.10
We now introduce and compare ligand 3 (obtained from
a Knoevenagel condensation of the corresponding malonate crown
ether,11 Scheme 1). It incorporates a 2,6-pyridinediacetyl moiety as
an additional stabilizing functionality in the binding of lanthanide
ions, while preserving the overall crown ether structure at 22
atoms as in the case of 2.
Despite the potential merit of the mathematical fit, Ercolani has
revisited several systems previously reported to show positive
cooperativity, and warned about a judgment on cooperativity on
the basis of Scatchard and Hill plots.16 Clearly, given that this sys-
tem involves a multivalent receptor (the lanthanide cation, which
can coordinate more than one macrocycle), and a multitopic ligand
(macrocycle 3, possessing two different binding sites), the sensi-
bility of the fitting parameters is highly questionable. Titrating 3
with Gd(OTf)3 also gives a sigmoidal titration profile similar to that
observed for Eu(OTf)3, and the same values in terms of binding
constants.17
O
O
O
To better ascertain the species present and the thermodynamic
relationships between them, a set of absorbance data like those
shown in Figure 2 for Eu(OTf)3 titrated with 3 was modeled using
a factor analysis program called Sivvu, which takes into account all
available wavelengths, and can potentially account for any set of
equilibria.18 Indeed, unrestricted factor analysis on the forward ti-
tration reveals that there are at least five and not more than seven
absorbing species that contribute to the data.19 The analysis on data
from the reverse titration (ligand into metal) indicates five major
absorbers. These likely include species with metal to ligand ratios of
1:1, 2:1, 1:2, 1:3, and 0:1. To verify this, the dataset for the forward
titration was modeled according to the following equilibria:
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
Piperidinium acetate/Δ
O
O
N
Scheme 1. Synthesis of chromophore 3.
Spectrophotometric titration of compound 3 with Eu(OTf)3 in
MeCN solutions showed an increase in the band associated with
the ICT band of the complex (centered at 480 nm, see Fig. 2), and
a decrease in the
p–
p band of the free ligand (centered at
*
377 nm), similarly to what is observed for 1 and 2. However, unlike
EuðOTfÞ3D3/Euð3ÞðOTfÞ3 log Ka1 [ 6:25ð36Þ
Eu2ð3ÞðOTfÞ6D3/2Euð3ÞðOTfÞ3 log Ka10 [ 5:45ð02Þ
Euð3ÞðOTfÞ3D3/Euð3Þ2ðOTfÞ3 log Ka2 [ 5:01ð4Þ
Euð3Þ2ðOTfÞ3D3/Euð3Þ3ðOTfÞ3 log Ka3 [ 5:07ð6Þ
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
This model fitted the data extremely well (though the possibility
of a 2:2 complex cannot be eliminated). The binding constants are
a result of least-squares refinement. The root-mean-square of the
residuals over all of the spectroscopic data points was just 0.0022.
The error values associated with the binding constants were cal-
culated by re-optimizing the model with 19% of the absorbance
data randomly ignored.20 These six (Eu(III) is a minor absorber)
equilibrium-restricted factors account for 99.76% of the data,
whereas six unrestricted factors could account for 99.787%. No
seventh factor could be found that decreased this gap. The dataset
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
Wavelength (nm)
Figure 2. Spectroscopic data for the titration of macrocycle
3
(5ꢁ10ꢀ5 M) with
Eu(OTf)3 (0.15ꢁ10ꢀ4 M). Inset: Absorbance profile at 480 nm as a function of europium
equivalents.

10438
C. Coluccini et al. / Tetrahedron 65 (2009) 10436–10440
from the reverse titration was also modeled with these chemical
equilibria and yielded corroborating results (see Fig. S7).
As expected, these binding constants are higher than the values
attained when just 1:1 binding was assumed since the presence of
other species depletes the effective amounts of reactants. It is also
clear that the pyridine moiety is involved in the binding, as con-
vincingly demonstrated by comparison of Ka1 value for ligand 3
with the Ka values obtained for ligands 1 and 2.
Figure 3 shows the evolving concentration values for the species
in solution for the forward and reverse titrations, which demon-
strate the extent to which multiple species co-exist in each
solution.
80x10-6
Eu
L
Eu2L
EuL
EuL2
EuL3
Figure 4. Refined molar absorptivity curves for the five dominant absorbers that were
found to exist in MeCN solutions of Eu(OTf)3 and macrocyle 3.
60
40
20
0
Furthermore, these peak absorbances shift monotonically from
472 nm down to 389 nm and finally 378 nm, which is nearly the
peak absorbance for the ligand by itself (377 nm). This observation
suggests that the mode of binding in these three complexes is quite
distinct. Eu(3)3(OTf)3 is likely formed by the coordination of three
pyridine moieties to the metal, leaving the three
electronically unperturbed. This is consistent with lesser steric
demand of the pyridine moieties compared to that of the -chro-
mophore end of the ligand. By comparison, the absorption around
475 nm for the 1:2, 1:1, and 2:1 complexes indicates that the
p-chromophores
p
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
p
-
Metal Equivalents
chromophore is coordinated directly to the metal. Eu(3)2(OTf)3
appears to have each of its two ligands coordinated in distinct
modes: one through the pyridine moiety that augments the band
100x10-6
80
below 400 nm, and one through the
p-chromophore that leads to
the new band at 475 nm. Eu(3)(OTf)3 presumably has one ligand
coordinated through both ends (a 2:2 complex is also possible),
which is further established with the addition of a second metal
cation to form Eu2(3)(OTf)6 that does not shift the peak positions
significantly as it also involves a ligand coordinated through both
60
40
20
0
the pyridine moiety and the
separate metal cations.
p-chromophore, but now to two
Doing a proper full factor analysis and fitting all wavelengths
makes it clear that the sigmoidal shape of the titration profile at
480 nm is not the result of cooperativity, but rather competition
between two binding sites (and the accompanying difference in
absorption of the resulting complexes) of the macrocyclic scaffold.
The first one, the diacetylpyridine, is spectroscopically silent at this
wavelength, and it is mainly involved in the binding process in the
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
Ligand Equivalents
presence of excess ligand 3; the second one, the
p-chromophore,
Figure 3. Concentration profiles for the six absorbers that were found to exist in MeCN
solutions of 3 upon titration with Eu(OTf)3 (top), and in solutions of Eu(OTf)3 uypon
titration with 3 (bottom).
spectroscopically active at this wavelength, is mainly involved at
higher lanthanide/macrocycle molar ratios.21
In order to corroborate this model, mass spectrometry was car-
ried out on a variety of MeCN solutions of lanthanide in the presence
of ligand 3. With excess ligand present (Fig. 5a), major peaks were
found for [EuL(OTf)2]þ, [EuL2]3þ, and [EuL2(OTf)]2þ; and minor
peaks were found for [EuL(OTf)2]þ, [EuL2(OTf)2]þ, [EuL3]3þ, and
[EuL3(OTf)]2þ. With excess metal present (Fig. 5b), major peaks were
found for [EuL(OTf)]2þ, and [EuL(OTf)2]þ; and minor peaks were
found for [EuL]3þ, [Eu2L(OTf)2]4þ,[Eu2L(OTf)3]3þ, [Eu2L(OTf)5]þ.
Mass spectrometry therefore helps confirm the identify all of
the species that comprise the model of the spectrophotmetric data.
Similar to ligand 2, for which the most abundant species in the gas
phase was [Eu(2)(OTf)2]þ, [Eu(3)(OTf)2]þ is still one of the most
abundant species present in the MS data.8a This suggests that the
first coordination sphere of the europium cation in MeCN consists
of all three triflate counterions, which are bidentate, and ligand in
a tridentate binding mode. The coordination of 2 then involves
a ‘soft’ ligand, the conjugated malonate, and a hard ligand, one of
Further confirmation of the role of the pyridine moiety can be
seen in the wavelength dependent color for each of the metal/
ligand complexes, which are simply determined simultaneously
with the optimization of the binding constants without any apriori
knowledge of absorptivity values. Figure 4 shows the calculated
molar absoptivity curves for the five absorbing species. The two
major bands (w380 nm and w475 nm) help distinguish between
the two binding sites of 3 (1,3-diacetylpyridine and
phore). By comparison with the behavior of model compounds 1
and 2, it is evident that coordination at the -chromophore brings
p-chromo-
p
about the formation of a new band around 475 nm, whereas co-
ordination to the 1,3-diacetylpyridine, as reported in the literature,
does not.21 Thus, coordination of the lanthanide cation by the 1,3-
diacetylpyridine does not alter the spectrum around 450 nm.
Not surprisingly, the peak intensity for complexes with one, two,
or three ligands per metal increase with ligand equivalents.

C. Coluccini et al. / Tetrahedron 65 (2009) 10436–10440
10439
were fully characterized via spectrophotometric titration and mass
spectrometry. Upon modification of the ligand 3 structure, and in
particular by realizing covalently bound dimeric macrocycles, it
should be possible to form colored, dynamic, stoichiometry-
switchable supramolecular polymers in a lanthanide-driven self-
assembly process.25
Ligands with multiple binding modes, especially ones with dif-
fering UV/Vis properties (e.g., silent or active at a particular wave-
length), can falsely support a hypothesis of cooperative binding. This
study strongly testifies to the usefulness of full factor analysis in the
interpretation of complex binding events. Modeling the full range of
absorbance data with Sivvu allowed for simultaneous thermody-
namic and spectroscopic characterization that then even helped to
sort out the competing binding modes of the ligand.
4. Experimental section
4.1. General
All commercially available compounds were used as received.
Lanthanide Triflate salts were stored under nitrogen. THF (Na),
CH2Cl2 (CaH2), and MeCN (CaH2) were dried and distilled before
use. Compounds 1 and 2 were prepared according to literature
procedures.8a Column chromatography was performed on silica gel
(0.040–0.063 mm). FTIR spectra were recorded using a KBr diffuse
reflectance accessories. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded
from solutions in CDCl3 or CD3CN on 200 or 300 MHz instruments
with the solvent residual proton signal as a standard. Mass spectra
were recorded using an Electrospray Ionization instrument LCQ
Decca (Thermofinnigan). Melting points are uncorrected.
4.1.1. Compound 3. The corresponding malonate crown ether12
(411 mg,1 mmol), p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde (150 mg,1 mmol)
and piperidinium acetate (10 mg) in toluene (50 mL) were heated
under reflux for 24 h with a Dean–Stark apparatus. The solvent
was then removed in vacuo and the product purified by column
chromatography (SiO2; AcOEt/Me2CO: 9/1) to give 3 as a yellow
solid (324 mg, 60%). Mp: 152–154 ꢂC (AcOEt). IR (cmꢀ1)¼1720
Figure 5. Mass spectrometry experiments for mixtures of ligand 3 (L, 0.001 M) and
Eu(OTf)3. A: 0.5 equiv of Eu(OTf)3. B: 3.0 equiv.
the ether oxygens.22 As this dual binding mode is unusual, mass
spectrometric experiments were carried out in MeCN with ligand 2
and equimolar quantities of five Ln(III) triflate salts (Ln¼La, Ce, Eu,
Gd, Yb) in order to ascertain possible marked differences in the
binding mode of the trivalent lanthanides. The experiment con-
firmed in all cases the presence of a 1:1 complex in which two
triflate counterions are clearly involved in the first coordination
sphere in the gas phase (see Fig. S1).
Interest in lanthanide luminescence owes to their sharp emis-
sive behavior in solution when suitably excited in the UV/Vis region
through an antenna chromophore. The presence of the conjugated
push–pull moiety in 1–3, directly involved in the coordination
sphere of the lanthanide complex suggests they might work as
antenna chromophores. The ligands 1–3 showed very weak emis-
(
nc]o), 1704 (nc]o). 1H NMR (CDCl3)
d
¼8.31 (m, 2H; PyH), 7.98 (t,
1H; PyH), 7.57 (s, 1H; –CH]C–), 7.37 (m, 2H; Ar-H), 6.65 (m, 2H;
Ar-H), 4.6–4.37 (m, 8H; –COOCH2CH2O–), 4.07–3.8 (m, 8H;
–COOCH2CH2O–), 3.05 (s, 6H; –N(CH3)2). 13C NMR (CD3CN)
d
¼167.3, 164.9, 164.8, 164.6, 152.3, 148.0, 142.7, 138.5, 131.8, 128.0,
127.9, 119.2, 119.0, 117.3, 111.6, 69.0, 68.8, 68.7, 68.6, 65.3, 64.8, 64.4,
39.2. UV (MeCN): lmax¼378 (35,520), 250 (10,340), 226 (12,280).
MS (EI, relative %)¼565.3 (100) [MþNa]þ, 543.3 (27) [MþH]þ, 542.3
(14) [M]þ. Anal. calcd for C27H30N2O10 C, 59.8%, H, 5.6%, N, 5.2%;
found C, 59.5%, H, 5.8%, N, 5.2%.
sive behavior in solution upon excitation of the lowest energy
p
–
p
*
Acknowledgements
absorption transition (in all cases with maxima at 380 nm). Upon
addition of Eu(OTf)3, excitation at 380 nm did not result in line-like
emission form the europium ion (Fig. S8).23 A similar, non-emissive
response was obtained by using an excitation wavelength posi-
tioned on the absorption band of the 1,3-pyridinediacetyl moieties
(280 nm).24 The dual nature of ligand 3, and the complex speciation
occurring in solution complicates the use of these cyclic chromo-
phores for optimal luminescence behavior.
This work was supported by the University of Pavia, MIUR (PRIN
2004), Fondazione CARIPLO (project ‘Self-Assembled Nano-
structured Materials: A Strategy for the Control of Electrooptic
Properties’ 2007–2009), the American Chemical Society Petroleum
Research Fund (DVG), and Research Corporation (DVG). We thank F.
Corana for help in the interpretation of the mass spectrometric
experiments, and G. Gattuso and M. Parisi (University of Messina,
Italy) for useful discussion.
3. Conclusions
Supplementary data
We have reported the construction of a novel chemical archi-
tecture, obtained by joining together two very different, yet pre-
organized, binding moieties, into a single ligand suitable for the
complexation of lanthanide cations. This ligand shows the ability to
form numerous architectures with various stoichiometries, which
General procedure for the determination of the binding con-
stants, additional graphs; additional mass spectrometric analysis.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the
online version, at doi:10.1016/j.tet.2009.10.024.

10440
C. Coluccini et al. / Tetrahedron 65 (2009) 10436–10440
13. (a) Pe´rez, E. M.; Sa´nchez, L.; Ferna´ndez, G.; Martı´n, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
References and notes
´
´
´
´
128, 7172–7173; (b) Fernandez, G.; Sanchez, L.; Perez, E. M.; Martın, N. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10674–10683.
1. Kuriki, K.; Koike, Y.; Okamoto, Y. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 2347–2356.
2. Pandya, S.; Yu, J.; Parker, D. Dalton Trans. 2006, 2757–2766.
3. (a) Aime, S.; Botta, M.; Fasano, M.; Terreno, E. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1998, 27, 19–29;
(b) Bu¨nzli, J.-C. G.; Piguet, C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34, 1048–1077.
4. (a) Charbonniere, L. J.; Ziessel, R.; Montalti, M.; Prodi, L.; Zaccheroni, N.;
Boehme, C.; Wipff, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7779–7788; (b) Kataoka, Y.;
Paul, D.; Miyake, H.; Yaita, T.; Miyoshi, E.; Mori, H.; Tsukamoto, S.; Tatewaki, H.;
Shinoda, S.; Tsukube, H. Chem.dEur. J. 2008, 14, 5258–5266.
14. Litvinchuk, S.; Bollot, G.; Mareda, J.; Som, A.; Ronan, D.; Shah, M. R.; Perrottet,
P.; Sakai, N.; Matile, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10067–10075.
15. Byers, L. D. J. Chem. Educ. 1977, 54, 352–354.
16. Ercolani, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 16097–16103; See also: Hamacek, J.;
Piguet, C. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 7783–7792.
17. Titration experiments were run (Table S1) using different concentrations of the
lanthanide triflate and/or inverting the species at fixed concentration, giving in
some instances variable results in terms of apparent association constants.
Recent examples have demonstrated how ion pairing can have dramatic effects
on the measurements of apparent binding stabilities at different concentra-
tions; as demonstrated by the mass spectrometric experiments, in this system
the counterions play an active role in the definition of the first coordination
sphere of the cation in the presence of the added ligands. (a) Gasa, T. B.; Spruell,
J. M.; Dichtel, W. R.; Sorensen, T. J.; Philp, D.; Stoddart, J. F.; Kuzmic, P.
Chem.dEur. J. 2009,15,106–116; (b) Pappalardo, S.; Villari, V.; Slovak, S.;Cohen, Y.;
Gattuso, G.; Notti, A.; Pappalardo, A.; Pisagatti, I.; Parisi, M. F. Chem.dEur. J.
2007, 13, 8164–8173.
18. Sivvu; Vander Griend, D. A.; DeVries, M. J.; Calvin College: Grand Rapids, MI,
2005; www.calvin.edu/wdav4/sivvu.
19. Hugus, Z. Z., Jr.; El-Awady, A. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1971, 75, 2954–2957.
20. 10% of the 451 wavelengths and 10% of the 30 solutions.
21. Renaud, F.; Piguet, C.; Bernardinelli, G.; Bunzli, J. C. G.; Hopfgartner, G.
Chem.dEur. J. 1997, 3, 1660–1667.
22. For a review on crown ether complexation of lanthanides and selectivity issues,
see Piguet, C.; Bu¨nzli, J.-C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1999, 28, 347–358; See also Ref. 3b.
23. Stomeo, F.; Lincheneau, C.; Leonard, J. P.; O’Brien, J. E.; Peacock, R. D.; McCoy, C.
P.; Gunnlaugsson, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 9636–9637.
5. Wolbers, M. P. O.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Snellink-Ruel, B. H. M.; Hofstraat, J. W.;
Geurts, F. A. J.; Reinhoudt, D. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 138–144.
6. Kawa, M.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10, 286–296.
7. (a) Desimoni, G.; Faita, G.; Quadrelli, P. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 3119–3154; See
also: (b) Leonard, J. P.; Jensen, P.; McCabe, T.; O’Brien, J. E.; Peacock, R. D.;
Kruger, P. E.; Gunnlaugsson, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10986–10987.
8. (a) Pasini, D.; Righetti, P. P.; Rossi, V. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 23–26; (b) Garlaschelli, G.;
Messina, I.; Pasini, D.; Righetti, P. P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 3385–3392; (c) Pasini,
D.; Righetti, P. P.; Zema, M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 1764–1769; (d) Coluccini,
C.; Metrangolo, P.; Parachini, M.; Pasini, D.; Resnati, G.; Righetti, P. P. J. Polym. Sci. A
2008, 46, 5202–5213.
9. Both Ka values determined by fitting an absorbance profile at 500 nm for a 1:1
binding model.
10. 1H NMR experiments with 2 and Eu(OTf)3 (from 0.1 to 0.4 equiv, CD3CN) show
the largest observed shift for the CH2 proton resonances belonging to the
OCH2C]O portion of the crown ether.
11. Carano, M.; Corvaja, C.; Garlaschelli, L.; Maggini, M.; Marcaccio, M.; Paolucci,
F.; Pasini, D.; Righetti, P. P.; Sartori, E.; Toffoletti, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
374–384.
12. Connors, K. A. Binding Constants: The Measurement of Molecular Complex
Stability; Wiley: New York, NY, 1987; In order to rule out the possibility of
kinetic delays in complex formation (thus giving apparent sigmoidal be-
haviour), the absorption measurements have been repeated in some in-
stances after a few hours interval showing no change between the two
measurements.
24. Weak emissive behavior by an Er complex with ligand 3 has been previously
reported. See Meinardi, F.; Colombi, N.; Destri, S.; Porzio, W.; Blumstengel, S.;
Cerminara, M.; Tubino, R. Synth. Met. 2003, 137, 959–960.
25. Marchal, C.; Filinchuk, Y.; Imbert, D.; Bu¨nzli, J.-C. G.; Mazzanti, M. Inorg. Chem.
2007, 46, 6242–6244.