4110
S. Mohapatra et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 4109–4110
Scheme 2. Reaction conditions: (a) TsCl, py, CH2Cl2, 23°C, 12 h. (b) 9, CuI, NaI, K2CO3, DMF, −40 to 23°C, 12 h. (c) Ni(P2),
H2, EtOH, 23°C, 2 h. (d) 4% oxalic acid, acetone/H2O (1:1), 0°C, 1 h. (e) 4, LDA, THF, −78°C, 2 h; product of step d, −78°C,
3 h. (f) 0.01% H2SO4, MeOH, 0°C, 0.5 h; K2CO3 (pH 10), 0°C, 1 h. (g) 1N LiOH, i-PrOH, 23°C, 12 h.
uneventfully into orthoester 415 via methyloxetane
Hashefi, M. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 9280–9286.
5. O’Flaherty, J. T.; Cordes, J.; Redman, J.; Thomas, M.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993, 192, 129–134.
6. Norgauer, J.; Barbisch, M.; Czech, W.; Pareigis, J.;
Schwenk, U.; Schro¨der, J. M. Eur. J. Biochem. 1996, 236,
1003–1009.
7. Powell, W. S.; Gravel, S.; Halwani, F.; Hii, C. S.; Huang,
Z. H.; Tan, A. M.; Ferrante, A. J. Immunol. 1997, 159,
2952–2959.
8. Powell, W. S.; Chung, D.; Gravel, S. J. Immunol. 1995,
154, 4123–4132.
9. Powell, W. S.; Gravel, S.; Halwani, F. Am. J. Respir. Cell
Mol. Biol. 1999, 20, 163–170.
(MOX) ester 3 according to Corey and Raju.16
The electrophilic aldol acceptor (Scheme 2) was fash-
ioned from the readily available bis-acetylene 517 by
tosylation under conventional conditions and alkyla-
tion with propiolaldehyde diethyl acetal (9) in the pres-
ence of Cu(I).17 The resultant tris-acetylene adduct 6
contains all of the remaining carbons of the eicosanoid
backbone. Its partial hydrogenation utilizing P-2
nickel18 reproducibly afforded all-cis-triene 7 over a
wide scale (mmol–mmol) without the need for purifica-
tion beyond filtration and evaporation of the solvent.
Deuteration or tritiation could also be conveniently
achieved during this procedure using isotopic gas. Care-
fully controlled acetal hydrolysis using 4% oxalic acid
at 0°C gave rise to a labile cis-enal that was immedi-
ately condensed with the enolate of 4 in anhydrous
THF at −78°C. The adduct 8 was converted to 1 by
sequential acidic hydrolysis of the orthoester with
0.01% H2SO4, in situ transesterification to its methyl
ester, taking care not to exceed 0°C and pH 10, and
finally saponification in i-PrOH, as recommended by
Kerdesky et al.19 The use of MeOH or THF/H2O as
solvent induced significant, but variable, isomerization
to 8,9-trans-5-oxo-ETE.
10. O’Flaherty, J. T.; Taylor, J. S.; Thomas, M. J. J. Biol.
Chem. 1998, 273, 32535–32541.
11. Hevko, J. M.; Bowers, R. C.; Murphy, R. C. J. Pharm.
Exp. Ther. 2001, 296, 293–305.
12. Bowers, R. C.; Hevko, J.; Henson, P. M.; Murphy, R. C.
J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 29931–29934.
13. The only total synthesis to date afforded 1 and its
8,9-trans-isomer in a 4:1 isolated ratio: Khanapure, S. P.;
Shi, X.-X.; Powell, S. P.; Rokach, J. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
63, 337–342.
14. Preparation of tritiated and deuterated 1: Khanapure, S.
P.; Shi, X.-X.; Powell, W. S.; Rokach, J. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 4098–4102.
15. Orthoester 4: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) l 0.79 (s, 3H),
1.64–1.77 (m, 4H), 2.12 (s, 3H), 2.45 (t, 2H, J=7.0 Hz),
3.88 (s, 6H). Acetal 7: l 0.89 (t, 2H, J=7.0 Hz), 1.22 (t,
6H, J=7.0 Hz), 1.26–1.46 (m, 6H), 2.05 (q, 2H, J=7.3
Hz), 2.80 (t, 2H, J=6.7 Hz), 2.93 (t, 2H, J=6.7 Hz),
3.48–3.55 (m, 2H), 3.61–3.69 (m, 2H), 5.24 (d, 1H, J=6.4
Hz), 5.30–5.43 (m, 4H), 5.47–5.52 (m, 1H), 5.56–5.63 (m,
1H). Adduct 8: l 0.79 (s, 3H), 0.89 (t, 3H, J=6.7 Hz),
1.26–1.41 (m, 6H), 1.64–1.79 (m, 4H), 2.04 (q, 2H, J=7.3
Hz), 2.47 (t, 2H, J=7.3 Hz), 2.52–2.67 (m, 2H), 2.79 (t,
2H, J=6.7 Hz), 2.87 (q, 2H, J=7.9 Hz), 3.01 (d, 1H,
J=3.3 Hz), 3.87 (s, 6H), 4.87–4.93 (m, 1H), 5.28–5.49 (m,
6H). Synthetic 1 was identical by NMR, MS, and HPLC
with an authentic standard.
Acknowledgements
Supported financially by the USPHS NIH (GM31278,
DK38226), the Robert A. Welch Foundation, and an
unrestricted grant from Taisho Pharmaceutical Co.,
Ltd. We express our appreciation to Professor Joshua
Rokach (Florida Institute of Technology) for providing
extensive spectral data.
References
16. Corey, E. J.; Raju, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 5571–
5574.
17. Lapitskaya, M. A.; Pivnitsky, K. K. Synthesis 1993,
65–66.
1. Powell, W. S.; Gravelle, F.; Gravel, S. J. Biol. Chem.
1992, 267, 19233–19241.
2. Schwenk, U.; Morita, E.; Engel, R.; Schro¨der, J. M. J.
Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 12482–12488.
18. Brown, C. A.; Ahuja, V. K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Com-
mun. 1973, 553–554.
19. Kerdesky, F. A.; Schmidt, S. P.; Holmes, J. H.; Dyer, R.
D.; Carter, G. W.; Brooks, D. W. J. Med. Chem. 1987,
30, 1177–1186.
3. Review: Zimpfer, U.; Hofmann, C.; Dichmann, S.;
Schopf, E.; Norgauer, J. Int. J. Mol. Med. 1998, 2,
149–153.
4. Powell, W. S.; Gravel, S.; MacLeod, R. J.; Mills, E.;