Communications
co-workers[15] by using indium trichloride and tris(pentafluoro-
and 2a (66.7 mg, 0.30 mmol) and triethylsilane (0.48 mL, 3.00 mmol)
were added. The flask was kept at 808C for 1 h with magnetic stirring.
After the flask had cooled, the solvent was concentrated in vacuo, and
the residue was purified by column chromatography on SiO2 with
EtOAc/n-hexane (5:95) to give 3a[16] as a yellow oil (47.6 mg,
0.231 mmol, 77% yield). 1H NMR: d = 2.33 (s, 3H), 3.78 (s, 2H),
7.12–7.44 ppm (m, 9H); 13C NMR: d = 21.0, 25.3, 82.4, 87.8, 123.7,
127.7, 127.8, 128.2, 129.2, 131.6, 133.7, 136.1 ppm.
phenyl)borane, respectively, as catalysts. During our work,
the propargylic reduction of propargylic acetates with trie-
thylsilane by use of a catalytic amount of indium tribromide[16]
was reported, in which the propargylic reduction of prop-
argylic alcohols did not proceed smoothly. The reaction
described herein provides the first example of the catalytic
and direct propargylic reduction of propargylic alcohols to
form the corresponding reduced products in good to high
yields, although the scope of the reaction is still limited.
Furthermore, we have investigated the ruthenium-cata-
lyzed reactions of propargylic alcohols with organosilicon
compounds other than trialkylsilanes under the same reaction
conditions. Interestingly, the reactions of 2a with allyltrime-
thoxysilane and triethoxysilane at 808C for one hour afforded
the corresponding ethers 6a and 6b in 81% and 88% yields,
respectively, after isolation (Scheme 5). The reaction of 2a
3l: Brown oil. Yield: 51%. 1H NMR: d = 3.22 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H),
6.18 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.29–7.36 ppm (m, 15H); 13C NMR: d = 20.6,
80.9, 88.1, 123.4, 127.3, 127.4, 127.7, 128.1, 128.2, 128.4, 128.6, 128.7,
129.8, 131.6, 139.2, 142.0, 143.3 ppm. HRMS: calcd for C23H18
294.1409; found: 294.1404.
:
Received: March 24, 2006
Revised: April 30, 2006
Published online: June 27, 2006
Keywords: homogeneous catalysis · reduction · ruthenium ·
.
silanes · synthetic methods
[1] a) I. Ojima, The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds (Eds.:
S. Patai, Z. Rappoport), Wiley, Chichester, 1989, p. 1479; b) T.
Hiyama, T. Kusumoto, Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, Vol. 8
(Eds.: B. M. Trost, I. Fleming), Pergamon, Oxford, UK, 1991,
p. 763; c) B. Marciniec, Comprehensive Handbook on Hydro-
silylation, Pergamon, Oxford, UK, 1992, p. 130; d) J. A. Reiche,
D. H. Bery, Adv. Organomet. Chem. 1998, 43, 197; e) For a
recent example, see: B. M. Trost, Z. T. Ball, Synthesis 2005, 853.
[2] a) B. M. Trost, Z. T. Ball, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12726;
b) B. M. Trost, Z. T. Ball, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 30;
c) B. M. Trost, Z. T. Ball, T. Jöge, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 3537;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3415; d) L. W. Chung, Y.-D. Wu,
B. M. Trost, Z. T. Ball, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11578;
e) B. M. Trost, Z. T. Ball, K. M. Laemmerhold, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 10028; f) B. M. Trost, Z. T. Ball, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 17644.
Scheme 5. Ruthenium-catalyzed propargylic substitution reactions of
propargylic alcohol with organosilicon compounds.
[3] a) K. Itami, K. Mitsudo, A. Nishino, J. Yoshida, J. Org. Chem.
2002, 67, 2645; b) Y. Kawanami, Y. Sonoda, T. Mori, K.
Yamamoto, Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2825; c) A. Mori, E. Takahisa,
Y. Yamamura, T. Kato, A. P. Mudalige, H. Kajiro, K. Hirabaya-
shi, Y. Nishihara, T. Hiyama, Organometallics 2004, 23, 1755;
d) H. Aneetha, W. Wu, J. G. Verkade, Organometallics 2005, 24,
2590; e) H. Katayama, M. Nagao, T. Nishimura, Y. Matsui, K.
Umeda, K. Akamatsu, T. Tsuruoka, H. Nawafune, F. Ozawa, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4350; f) M. Nagao, K. Asano, K.
Umeda, H. Katayama, F. Ozawa, J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 10511;
g) C. Menozzi, P. I. Dalko, J. Cossy, J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
10717; h) G. D. Bo, G. Berthon-Gelloz, B. Tinant, I. E. Markó,
Organometallics 2006, 25, 1881.
[4] a) Y. Nishibayashi, H. Imajima, G. Onodera, M. Hidai, S.
Uemura, Organometallics 2004, 23, 26; b) Y. Nishibayashi, H.
Imajima, G. Onodera, Y. Inada, M. Hidai, S. Uemura, Organo-
metallics 2004, 23, 5100.
[5] a) S. C. Ammal, N. Yoshikai, Y. Inada, Y. Nishibayashi, E.
Nakamura, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9428; b) Y. Inada, Y.
Nishibayashi, S. Uemura, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 7893; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7715; c) Y. Inada, M. Yoshikawa, M. D.
Milton, Y. Nishibayashi, S. Uemura, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006,
881.
with allyldimethylsilane under the same reaction conditions
led to the formation of the allylated compound 7a in 62%
yield after isolation (Scheme 5).[17] These results indicate that
the ability of substituent transfer from a silicon center to the
propargylic position has the following trend in these catalytic
reactions: alkoxy > allyl > hydride @ alkyl, aryl.
In summary, we have observed novel ruthenium-catalyzed
propargylic reduction of propargylic alcohols with triethylsi-
lane to give the corresponding alkynes in good to high yields
with complete selectivity. The transition-metal-catalyzed
propargylic reduction of propargylic alcohols has until now
been an unknown reaction system, in contrast to the recently
reported transition-metal-catalyzed propargylic substitution
reactions of propargylic alcohol derivatives with nucleophiles.
Further investigations for elucidating the reaction mechanism
in detail and for broadening the synthetic application of this
propargylic reduction are currently in progress.
[6] Re: a) B. D. Sherry, A. T. Radosevich, F. D. Toste, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 6076; Au: b) M. Georgy, V. Boucard, J.-M.
Campagne, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14180.
[7] Cu: Y. Imada, M. Yuasa, I. Nakamura, S.-I. Murahashi, J. Org.
Chem. 1994, 59, 2282.
Experimental Section
Typical procedure for the propargylic reduction of propargylic
alcohol (2a) with triethylsilane, catalyzed by 1c: Compound 1c
(11.5 mg, 0.015 mmol) was placed in a 20-mL flask under N2. Distilled
and degassed 1,2-dichloroethane (10 mL) was then added to the flask,
[8] Ti: R. Mahrwald, S. Quint, Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 7463.
4838
ꢀ 2006 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4835 –4839