Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
Figure 2. continued
e-NHK. Plum: Cr(III)-based e-NHK. All experiments contain [Cr] = 0.016 M, [NiCl2·glyme] = 0.0016 M, [L4] = 0.0024 M, [Cp2ZrCl2] = 0.04
M, [1] = 0.08 M, [S11] = 0.16 M, [TBAPF6] = 0.1 M, DMF, a Ni working electrode, and an Al counter electrode. CV data acquired with a 0.025
V/s scan rate. Part D, right: CrCl3·3THF: [CrCl3·3THF] = 2 mM. CrCl3·3THF + Ni(II) catalyst: [CrCl3·3THF] = 2 mM, [NiCl2·glyme] = 0.2
mM, [L4] = 0.3 mM. Ni(II) catalyst: [NiCl2·glyme] = 0.2 mM, [L4] = 0.3 mM. All CV experiments were run in DMF with [TBAPF6] = 0.1 M and
acquired with a scan rate of 100 mV/s, GC working electrode, and Al counter electrode. All potentials referenced to Fc+/0. Part E, left. [S11] = 160
mM, [1] = 80 mM, [CrCl2] = 16 mM, [Cp2ZrCl2] = 40 mM, [NiCl2·glyme] = 1.6 mM, [L4] = 2.4 mM (teal), [S11] = 160 mM, [1] = 80 mM,
[CrCl3·3THF] = 16 mM, [Cp2ZrCl2] = 40 mM, [NiCl2·glyme] = 1.6 mM, [L4] = 2.4 mM (plum), [S11] = 160 mM, [1] = 80 mM, [CrCl3·3THF]
= 16 mM, [Cp2ZrCl2] = 40 mM, [NiCl2·glyme] = 0 mM, [L4] = 0 mM (tangerine), and [CrCl3·3THF] = 16 mM (clover). Part E, right: UV−vis
of the Cr(II)-based e-NHK mixture prior to bulk electrolysis (solid teal), the Cr(II)-based e-NHK mixture after an applied potential of −1.5 V vs
Fc+/0 for 15 min and then an applied potential of −2.0 V vs Fc+/0 for 30 min (dashed teal), the Cr(III)-based e-NHK mixture prior to bulk
electrolysis (solid plum), and the Cr(III)-based e-NHK mixture after an applied potential of −1.5 V vs Fc+/0 for 15 min and then an applied
potential of −2.0 V vs Fc+/0 for 30 min (dashed plum). Absorbance data were baseline-corrected by taking the absorbance at 900 nm to be zero.
The asterisk indicates portions of the UV−vis absorbance data that have signal saturation inherent to the detector/light source used for these
experiments. Part F, middle left: Comparison of induction period with different current. [58] = 0.08 M, [59] = 0.08 M, [CrCl3] = 0.016 M,
[TESCl] = 0.16 M, [TBAClO4] = 0.1 M, with 2.5, 5, and 7.5 mA, respectively. Part F, middle right: reaction rate after removing the induction
period. Part F, bottom left: Comparison of the dependence of reaction rates on the concentration of 58, 59, and CrCl3.
To further identify potential species associated with this
catalytic wave, we acquired analytical CVs of the individual e-
NHK reaction components and then sequentially combined
components of the e-NHK reaction toward the complete
reaction mixture. The formal potential of CrCl3·3THF in DMF
was determined to be −1.06 V vs Fc+/0 with a peak-to-peak
separation, ΔEp, of 1.1 V at a scan rate of 100 mV/s, which
suggests slow electron transfer due to a large inner-sphere
reorganization energy (Figure 2D, right, plum). Upon addition
of Ni(II) to a solution of CrCl3·3THF, the main redox process
shifts to a half-wave potential of −1.2 V vs Fc+/0 and exhibits
greater reversibility (ΔEp = 0.130 V at 100 mV/s) (Figure 2D,
right, teal). While we cannot yet assign the nature of this
redox-active species, the influence of Ni(II) on the redox
behavior suggests the presence of a potential interaction
between the two metal species during electrocatalysis, which is
in accord with prior electrochemical studies.16 Introduction of
Cp2ZrCl2 and alkyl aldehyde 1 to the mixture of Cr(III) and
Ni(II) did not significantly change the CV of the Cr(III)/
Ni(II) mixture (Figure S4, clover vs teal line). In contrast,
addition of alkenyl bromide S11 to a solution of Cr(III),
Ni(II), and Cp2ZrCl2 yielded a significant cathodic current at
−2.0 V vs Fc+/0, which has an onset potential at a cathodic
wave that is only present when Ni(II) is in solution (Figure S7,
blue). Thus, we hypothesize that this catalytic current
originates from the electrocatalytic, low-valent Ni homocou-
pling of the alkenyl bromide, a reaction precedented by
from the resulting Cr(II) to the Ni(II) catalyst, which would
regenerate Cr(III) and form a proposed low-valent Ni species
that oxidatively adds to 1 for cross-coupling, as suggested by
the reaction pathways in Figure 2A. These results and those
discussed below point to a potential Cr(III) resting redox state.
After characterizing the catalytic current for the e-NHK
system, we next attempted to observe the proposed Cr(III)
catalyst resting state during bulk electrolysis by utilizing a
combination of ex situ UV−vis spectroscopy and in situ UV−
vis spectroelectrochemistry. The ligand field transitions of
pseudo-octahedral Cr(III) and high-spin, pseudo-octahedral
Cr(II) in ∼Oh symmetry provide excellent handles for
determining active components in the e-NHK mixture. For
example, the UV−vis spectrum of CrCl3·3THF dissolved in
DMF exhibits two bands with λmax = 677 and 487 nm. These
4
4
bands can be attributed to A2g
→
4T2g, T1g transitions,
respectively (Figure S23). Of note, a Fano antiresonance is
observed on the lower-energy ligand field transition (∼695
nm); this feature reflects the spin−orbit interaction between a
spectroscopically spin-forbidden ligand field excited state
2
2
(likely specific orbital components of either the Eg or T1g
states) with a vibrationally broadened spin-allowed ligand field
excited state.21,22 Antiresonances have been observed for
various other six-coordinate Cr(III) complexes.19,23 For Cr(II),
we observe a band at λmax = 843 nm, which can be assigned as
the 5Eg → 5T2g transition (Figure S21). We initially monitored
the reduction of Cr(III) to Cr(II) in the absence of other
components, confirming that one-electron reduction decreased
absorbance due to Cr(III) and increased absorbance due to
Cr(II) (Figure S28). We then probed the complete CrCl3·
3THF-based e-NHK reaction mixture during active electro-
catalysis. Both ligand field transitions for Cr(III) persisted at
open circuit potential (OCP) (Figure 2E, left, plum) and while
holding the potential at both −1.5 V vs Fc+/0 or −2.0 V vs
Fc+/0 (Figure 2E, right, plum), suggesting persistence of
Cr(III) during electrolysis. Interestingly, both absorptions for
Cr(III) slightly blue-shift and increase in intensity relative to
an independently prepared CrCl3·3THF sample (Figure 2E,
left, clover) as well as a non-electrolyzed CrCl3·3THF-based e-
NHK mixture that excluded Ni(II) catalyst (Figure 2E, left,
tangerine). One possibility for this shift is a change in the
inner-sphere coordination environment during redox cycling of
Cr(III/II) or an interaction between Ni and Cr(III). However,
a definitive conclusion cannot be drawn from these experi-
ments, and a future study will be directed at structural and
́
́
Nedelec and co-workers employing similar electrolysis
conditions.17 Next, we investigated the concentration depend-
encies of the catalytic wave and observed a linear correlation
between the peak catalytic current and both [CrCl3·3THF]
results differ from the observed kinetics of the reaction under
bulk electrolysis. We note that the analytical CV studies
require 8-fold more dilute concentrations, which can alter the
kinetics of the e-NHK and shift the Ni catalyst resting state
from a kinetically saturated species to another elementary step
that has a rate dependence on [Ni]. In electrocatalysis, a linear
relationship between [catalyst] and catalytic current is
expected for an electrocatalytic mechanism based upon ErCi′
(i.e., reversible electron transfer followed by an irreversible,
catalytic chemical step).18 The concentration dependence data
for Cr(III) and Ni(II) are indeed consistent with an e-NHK
mechanism that proceeds first by reversible cathodic electron
transfer to Cr(III) followed by irreversible electron transfer
9485
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 9478−9488