COMMUNICATION
contrast to the rare examples of copper complexes with coor-
dinated tertiary amides (2.16-2.49 Å).3a-c These amide-coor-
dinated species are sensitive to C-N bond cleavage,3b-c,6
while 2 is stable in methanol. The stability of the amide C-N
bonds in 2 can be attested to the fact that the metal is not
coordinated by the amide N atom. The Ala portion of
the same ligand coordinates to the other copper atom in
2, Cu2, via the terminal amine nitrogen and the carbonyl
oxygen atom.15 The second ligand in the bimetallic complex
is related via a noncrystallographic pseudo-C2 axis to the
first ligand; thus, two LAla ligands bridge between the copper
atoms in 2.
The coordination geometry around each copper is closest
to square pyramidal, with a N3O ligand set in the equatorial
plane and a chloride ligand in the axial position (τ ) 0.16
and 0.10 for Cu1 and Cu2, respectively).16 The chloride
anions bridge between bimetallic moieties [ Cu-Cl-Cu )
158.25(5)°] to create linear chains of molecules along the
crystallographic b axis (see Figure S5). The intra- and
intermolecular Cu‚‚‚Cu distances in 2 are long (> 4.9 Å),
making any significant magnetic coupling between copper-
(II) ions unlikely, an assertion corroborated by the typical
Figure 1. Representation of the X-ray structure of 2 as 50% thermal
ellipsoids. H atoms have been omitted for clarity. Selected bond distances
(Å): Cu1-O2, 1.998(3); Cu1-N2, 1.999(3); Cu1-N1, 2.031(3); Cu1-
N8, 2.057(3); Cu1-Cl1, 2.508(1); Cu2-N6, 1.984(3); Cu1-O1, 1.999(3);
Cu2-N4, 2.007(3); Cu2-N5, 2.025(3); Cu2-Cl1A, 2.526(1).
axial EPR spectrum of 2 (g ) 2.08, g| ) 2.39, ACu
)
|
1 and 2 was determined in solution by ESI-MS. For 1 in
120 G).8
CH3CN: m/z ) 797 [M - ClO4]+, m/z ) 348 [M - CuLGly
-
(ClO4)3]+. For 2 in CH3CN: m/z ) 825 [M - Cl]+, m/z )
761 [M - ClO4]+, m/z ) 362 [M - CuLAlaCl(ClO4)2]+. The
dimeric form of 2 was verified in the solid state by X-ray
crystallography.
Unlike the dimeric 2:2 ligand-metal ratio of 1 and 2, in
the solid state 3 has a 1:2 ligand-metal stoichiometry (vide
infra). Attempts to synthesize the 1:1 or 2:2 ligand-copper
complex using LPhe were unsuccessful, with exclusive
formation of 3 even when excess LPhe was used. Attempts
to synthesize copper complexes with LPhe using cupric
perchlorate were also unsuccessful. The inability of LPhe to
form symmetrical dimers with Cu(ClO4)2, as LGly and LAla
do in 1 and 2, may be a consequence of steric interactions
of the bulkier Phe side chains.
The crystal structure of 2 confirmed that it is composed
of bimetallic species where two copper(II) ions are bridged
via two LAla ligands to form a 4+ cation (Figure 1).11,12 The
charge is balanced by one bridging chloride anion13 and three
outer sphere perchlorate anions. The chloride links molecules
of 2 in the crystal lattice by bridging between Cu1 from one
dimer and Cu2 from an adjacent dimer.
The TACN portion of the LAla ligand binds to Cu1 via
two amine nitrogens, but the amide nitrogen is not coordi-
nated.14 The Cu1‚‚‚N3 distance of 2.96 Å in 2 stands in
The crystal structure of 3 revealed a bimetallic complex
that is different than 2 (Figure 2).11,17 Here, LPhe bridges
between the two copper(II) ions in a manner similar to 2
with the TACN ring binding to Cu1 through the amine N
atoms in a bidentate fashion and the Phe portion of the ligand
binding to Cu2 through the terminal amine and the carbonyl
O atom. However, unlike the symmetric binding mode in 2,
the coordination sphere around each copper(II) ion in 3 is
completed by two chloride ligands.
(10) Analytical data for 1-3 (see Supporting Information for full details).
1: 0.18 g, 40% yield. Anal. Calcd for 1‚2H2O, C16H40Cl4Cu2N8O20:
C, 20.59; H, 4.32; N, 12.00. Found: C, 20.04; H, 4.33; N, 11.08. 2:
0.28 g, 60% yield. Anal. Calcd for 2, C18H40Cl4Cu2N8O14‚CH3NO2‚
H2O: C, 24.26; H, 4.82; N, 13.51. Found: C, 23.53; H, 4.88; N, 12.53.
3: 0.136 g, 50% yield. Anal. Calcd for 3, C15H24Cl4Cu2N4O: C, 33.04;
H, 4.44; N, 10.27. Found: C, 32.78; H, 4.91; N, 10.21.
(11) Data collection was performed on a Bruker Apex CCD diffractometer
with Mo KR radiation (0.71073 Å) at 143 K for 2 and 120 K for 3.
See Supporting Information for full details.
The coordination geometry around both copper(II) ions
is square planar,18 with an N2Cl2 ligand set around Cu1 and
(12) X-ray data for 2: C18H40Cl4Cu2N8O14‚CH3NO2‚H2O, M ) 940.52,
orthorhombic, space group P212121, a ) 9.996(1) Å, b ) 17.432(2)
Å, c ) 20.285(2) Å, V ) 3534.7(7) Å3, Z ) 4, Fcalcd ) 1.767 g/cm3.
All non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic thermal
parameters, and hydrogen atoms were included with idealized
parameters except the hydrogen atoms on N1, N2, N4, N5, N6, N8,
and O17, which were located and refined with fixed temperature
factors. Full-matrix least-squares refinement on F2 converged with R1
) 0.0505, wR2 ) 0.1334, GOF ) 1.051 for 6919 independent
reflections with I > 2σ(I) and 492 parameters.
(15) This type of chelating binding mode for amino acids is relatively
common and, in particular, has been reported for copper(II) amino
acid species. (a) Tan, X. S.; Fujii, Y.; Sato, T.; Nakano, Y.; Yashiro,
M. Chem. Commun. 1999, 881-882. (b) Castellano, E. E.; Piro, O.
E.; Casado, N. M. C.; Brondino, C. D.; Calvo, R. J. Chem. Crystallogr.
1998, 28, 61-68.
(16) Addison, A. W.; Rao, T. N.; Reedijk, J.; van Rijn, J.; Verschoor, G.
C. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1984, 1349-1356.
(17) X-ray data for 3: C15H24Cl4Cu2N4O, M ) 545.26, monoclinic, space
group P21, a ) 7.5158(6) Å, b ) 7.5207(6) Å, c ) 17.9669(15) Å, â
) 100.012(1)°, V ) 1000.1(1) Å3, Z ) 2, Fcalcd ) 1.811 g/cm3. All
non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic thermal parameters,
and hydrogen atoms were included with idealized parameters. Full-
matrix least-squares refinement on F2 converged with R1 ) 0.0221,
wR2 ) 0.0492, GOF ) 1.005 for 3795 independent reflections with
I > 2σ(I) and 235 parameters.
(13) The most likely origin of the chloride is either contamination in the
ligand or in the cupric perchlorate.
(14) This is not surprising in light of the poor coordinating ability of tertiary
amides. See Greenberg, A. In The Amide Linkage; Greenberg, A.,
Breneman, C. M., Liebman, J. F., Eds.; Wiley-Interscience: New York,
2000, pp 47-84.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 42, No. 18, 2003 5463