J . Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7661-7662
7661
Ch a r t 1
Ben zoyla tion of Dia n ion s: P r ep a r a tion of
Mon oben zoyla ted Der iva tives of
Sym m etr ica l Secon d a r y Dia m in es
Tao Wang,* Zhongxing Zhang, and
Nicholas A. Meanwell
Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute,
5 Research Parkway, P.O. Box 5100,
Wallingford, Connecticut 06492
Received May 25, 1999
Monoacylated symmetrical secondary diamines are
building blocks1 or intermediates2 widely used in the drug
discovery process that are present in several investiga-
tional and established drugs.3 Examples include the
cardiotonic agent vesnarinone and the antihypertensive
agent prazosin (Chart 1). Direct monoacylation of sym-
metrical diamines is frequently fraught with the com-
plication associated with the tendency for bis-acylation
to occur. To date, there are a number of indirect, multi-
step preparations of monoacylated symmetric secondary
diamines from diamines4,5 with the most common path-
way involving the selective monoprotection of one nitro-
gen atom, followed by acylation of the remaining nitrogen
and finally deprotection, to afford the desired product.5
There have been few reports of the direct transforma-
tion of diamines to mono benzoyl diamines,6-9 the main
difficulty with this simple transformation being the
formation of dibenzoyl diamines.6 Under normal basic
conditions using, for example, pyridine as the base and
solvent, the dibenzoylated compound 4a was the domi-
nant product, even through a large excess (10 equiv) of
piperazine 1a was used (Scheme 1). A possible explana-
tion of the uncontrollable dibenzoylation of symmetrical
secondary diamines under these conditions is that the
monobenzoylated intermediate 3a is more soluble in the
solvent than piperazine 1a and reacts preferentially with
the benzoyl chloride to provide predominantly the ob-
served dibenzoylated product 4a .
Sch em e 1
This problem has been resolved to some degree by
application of a rather laborious procedure involving the
multistep addition of starting materials with very cau-
tious control of the pH (range 3.8-5.4) of the reaction
mixture.5,6 Similarly, Watthey and co-workers described
the direct monoaroylation of piperazine and homopip-
erazine in moderate yields (46-60%) using AcOH as the
solvent.7 In this case, the authors took advantage of the
fact that piperazine was mostly present as a monoacetate
salt and the product remained in that form after the
benzoylation. Alternative procedures have utilized ben-
zoic acid8 and benzoic esters9 as coupling partners.
After encountering several of these problems in the
preparation of monobenzoylated piperazine derivatives,
we sought a more reliable and predictable procedure that
would be of general applicability. The criteria established
for this new methodology were: (a) simple and readily
available starting materials; (b) mild, preferably room
temperature conditions; (c) the formation of the product
cleanly in high yield.
It was rationalized that the reactivity of the diamine
could be altered by making the mono or disalt 5 of
diamine 1, which should be more reactive toward an aroyl
chloride than diamine 1 itself, thus affording the mono-
acylated product 3a under kinetical control (Scheme 2).
In developing this strategy, several experimental proto-
cols were explored: 1 (a) 1 equiv of BuLi, (b) 1 equiv of
BzCl;10 2 (a) 1 equiv of BuLi, (b) 1 equiv of TMSCl, (c) 1
equiv of BzCl;11 3 (a) 2 equiv of BuLi, (b) 1 equiv of BzCl;12
4 (a) 2 equiv of BuLi, (b) 1 equiv of TMSCl, (c) 1 equiv of
BzCl;13 5 (a) 1 equiv of BuLi, (b) 1 equiv of TMSCl, (c) 1
equiv of BuLi, (d) 1 equiv of BzCl.14
(1) (a) Fukushi, H.; Mabuchi, H.; Terashita, Z.-I.; Nishikawa, K.;
Sugihara, H. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1994, 42, 551. (b) Ross, D. D.;
Lednicer, D. J . Heterocycl. Chem. 1982, 91, 975. (c) Walsh, D. A.; Green,
J . B.; Franzyshen, S. K.; Nolan, J . C.; Yanni, J . M. J . Med. Chem. 1990,
33, 2028. (d) Kurokama, M.; Sato, F.; Fujiwara, I.; Hatano, N.; Honda,
Y.; Yoshida, T.; Naruto, S.; Mastumoto, J .-I.; Uno, H. J . Med. Chem.
1991, 34, 927. (e) Dillard, R. D.; Yen, T. T.; Stark, P.; Pavey, D. E. J .
Med. Chem. 1980, 23, 717. (f) Sturzebecher, J .; Prasa, D.; Hauptmann,
J .; Vieweg, H.; Wirkstrom, P. J . Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 3091. (g)
Leonardi, A.; Motta, G.; Boi, C.; Testa, R.; Poggesi, E.; Benedetti, P.
G. D.; Menziani, M. C. J . Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 427.
(2) (a) Williams, L.; Booth, S. E.; Undheim, K. Tetrahedron 1994,
50, 13697. (b) Li, R.-T.; Ding, P.-Y.; Han, M.; Cai, M.-S. Synth.
Commun. 1998, 28, 295.
(3) (a) Ohnishi, A.; Ishizaki, J . Clin. Pharmacol. 1988, 28, 719. (b)
Ravina, E.; Teran, C.; Santana, L.; Garcia, N.; Estevez, I. Heterocycles
1990, 31, 1967. (c) Scriabine, A.; Constantine, J . W.; Hess, H.-J .;
McShane, W. K. Experientia 1980, 24, 1150.
(4) (a) Manoury, P. M.; Binet, J . L.; Dumas, A. P.; Lefevre-Borg, F.;
Cavero, I. J . Med. Chem. 1986, 29, 19. (b) Dhawan, B.; Southwich, P.
L. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 1975, 7, 85. (c) Southwich, P. L.; Dhawan,
B. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 1976, 8, 205. (d) Lyle, R. E.; Coppola, B. P.;
Saavedra, J . E.; Lyle, G. G. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 1978, 10, 304.
(5) Dorokhova, M. I.; Alekseeva, E. N.; Kuznetsova, I. A.; Portnov,
M. A.; Rozanova, Y. M.; Tikhnova, O. Y.; Mikhalev, V. A. Pharm. Chem.
J . 1974, 737, and references herein.
(6) (a) J acobi, K. Ber. Chem. 1933, 66, 113. (b) Cymerman-Craig,
J .; Rogers, W. P.; Tate, M. E. Austr. J . Chem. 1956, 9, 397.
(7) Desai, M.; Watthey, J . W. H.; Zuckerman, M. Org. Prep. Proced.
Int. 1976, 8, 85.
When piperazine 1a was treated with 2 equiv of
(10) At -78 °C, 3a /4a ) 1:3.2; At 0 °C, 3a /4a ) 1:2.2.
(11) At room temperature, 3a /4a ) 1:6.5.
(8) Masaguer, C. F.; Ravina, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 5171.
(9) Um, I.-H.; Kwon, H.-J .; Kwon, D.-S. J . Chem. Res., Miniprint
1995, 1801.
(12) At 0 °C, 3a /4a ) 1.4:1; At room temperature, 3a /4a ) 35:1.
(13) At room temperature, 3a /4a ) 1:2.7.
(14) At room temperature, 3a /4a ) 1:1.
10.1021/jo9908501 CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 09/08/1999