1104
LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHROURETERECTOMY FOR UPPER TRACT TRANSITIONAL CELL CANCER
suggest that the laparoscopic group will have more meta- is the longer operating time, although our operative approach
static disease at a longer followup. Overall the laparoscopic continues to evolve to address this issue. We recently began to
group had 3 retroperitoneal recurrences and 1 case more take advantage of the incision required for intact specimen
than the open group with metastatic disease. However, 54% removal to allow hand assistance for mobilizing the kidney and
of the laparoscopic group and only 38% of the open group had ureter. We believe that with increasing surgeon experience
grade 3 or 4 disease. Also, the only patient with stage T4 and greater acceptance of hand assisted laparoscopy operating
disease was in the laparoscopic group and he had metastatic time will markedly decrease. When operating time decreases
disease.
and if the question of retroperitoneal seeding is answered sat-
From an efficiency standpoint laparoscopic nephroureter- isfactorily, laparoscopic nephroureterectomy may well become
ectomy was far inferior to open nephroureterectomy. Oper- the procedure of choice for the ablative management of upper
ating time for the laparoscopic procedure was twice as long as tract transitional cell carcinoma.
for open surgery (table 2). Part of the problem in this regard
is the relative lack of surgeon experience with laparoscopic
REFERENCES
nephroureterectomy. As we became more experienced, oper-
1. Cummings, K. B.: Nephroureterectomy: rationale in the man-
agement of transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary
tract: Urol Clin N Amer, 7: 569, 1980
2. Blute, M.: Endourology: management of upper tract genitouri-
nary pathology: Curr Prob Urol, 1: 4, 1991
3. Clayman, R. V. and Kavoussi, L. R.: Endosurgical techniques for
the diagnosis and treatment of noncalculous disease of the
ureter and kidney: In: Campbell’s Urology, 6th ed. Edited by
P. C. Walsh, A. B. Retik, T. A. Stamey et al. Philadelphia:
W. B. Saunders, pp. 2231–2303, 1992
4. Eraky, I., el-Kappany, H., Shamaa, M. A. et al: Laparoscopic
nephrectomy: an established routine procedure. J Endourol, 8:
275, 1994
5. Gill, I. S., Clayman, R. V. and McDougall, E. M.: Advances in
urological laparoscopy. J Urol, 154: 1275, 1995
6. Clayman, R. V., Kavoussi, L. R., Figenshau, R. S. et al: Laparo-
scopic nephroureterectomy: initial clinical case report. J Lapa-
roendosc Surg, 1: 343, 1991
7. McDougall, E. M., Clayman, R. V. and Elashry, O.: Laparoscopic
nephroureterectomy for upper tract transitional cell cancer:
the Washington University experience. J Urol, 154: 975, 1995
8. Shalhav, A. L., Elbahnasy, A. M., McDougall, E. M. et al: Lapa-
roscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract transitional cell
cancer: technical aspects. J Endourol, 12: 345, 1998
9. Chung, H. J., Chiu, A. W., Chen, K. K. et al: Retroperitoneoscopy-
assisted nephroureterectomy for the management of upper tract
urothelial cancer. MIT, 5: 266, 1996
ating time decreased by 21% to 6 hours. In addition, time-
saving maneuvers may be used. Using pluck ureterectomy
with a hand assisted approach Keeley and Tolley achieved an
operating time equivalent to that of open nephroureterec-
tomy.10
Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy had several benefits
over open nephroureterectomy in regard to patient equanim-
ity. Patients lost half as much blood, required 4-fold less
morphine sulfate equivalent for postoperative analgesia, re-
sumed oral intake 6 times more rapidly, were discharged
from the hospital almost 3 times sooner and returned to
normal activity 2 times sooner. In our series the major com-
plication rate was lower for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy
(table 2). Notably there was a higher incidence of pulmonary
complications in the open than in the laparoscopic group (4 of
17 cases or 24% versus 0%). This finding is similar to that
reported by Keeley and Tolley, who noted pulmonary compli-
cations in 19% and 4.5% of patients in the open and laparo-
scopic groups, respectively.10 The difference may correlate
with postoperative pain and splinting due to the subcostal
incision made for the renal portion of 2-incision open
nephroureterectomy as well as with the tendency of patients
treated laparoscopically to hyperventilate to avoid hypercar-
bia.
10. Keeley, F. X., Jr. and Tolley, D. A.: Laparoscopic nephroureter-
ectomy: making management of upper-tract transitional cell
carcinoma entirely minimally invasive. J Endourol, 12: 139,
1998
11. Salomon, L., Hoznek, A., Cicco, A. et al: Retroperitoneoscopic
nephroureterectomy for renal pelvic tumors with a single iliac
incision. J Urol, 161: 541, 1999
CONCLUSIONS
At this time the efficacy of laparoscopic nephroureterec-
tomy for upper tract transitional cell cancer appears to be
similar to that of open nephroureterectomy in regard to blad-
der recurrence, metastatic disease, and crude and cancer
specific survival. While concerns over port site and intraperi- 12. Jones, D. R. and Moisey, C. U.: A cautionary tale of the modified
“pluck” nephroureterectomy. Br J Urol, 71: 486, 1993
13. Hetherington, J. W., Ewing, R. and Philip, N. H.: Modified
nephroureterectomy: a risk of tumour implantation. Br J Urol,
58: 368, 1986
toneal seeding have been voiced and duly noted, to our
knowledge this complication has not developed to date. A
disconcerting point involves the higher incidence of retroper-
itoneal recurrence in the laparoscopic group. Whether this
incidence is due to the laparoscopic approach or the high
grade and stage of disease treated in our series cannot yet be
determined due to our small number of cases and limited
followup. In this regard the importance of the accurate re-
porting of grade and stage, and the need for thorough metic-
ulous followup cannot be overemphasized. Given the small
number of cases of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma, it
is important for investigators interested in laparoscopic
nephroureterectomy to present data in a consistent fashion
to allow the proper pooling of information.
14. Arango, O., Bielsa, O., Carles, J. et al: Massive tumor implan-
tation in the endoscopic resected area in modified nephroure-
terectomy. J Urol, 157: 1983, 1997
15. Figenshau, R. S., Albala, D. M., Clayman, R. V. et al: Laparo-
scopic nephroureterectomy: initial laboratory experience. Min
Invasive Ther, 1: 93, 1991
16. Williams, D. F.: Titanium as a metal for implantation. Part 1:
physical properties. J Med Eng Technol, 1: 195, 1977
17. Williams, D. F.: Titanium as a metal for implantation. Part 2:
biological properties and clinical applications. J Med Eng
Technol, 1: 266, 1977
18. Urban, D. A., Kerbl, K., McDougall, E. M. et al: Organ entrap-
ment and renal morcellation: permeability studies. J Urol,
150: 1792, 1993
Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy provides patients with ob-
vious benefits, including fewer pulmonary complications, less
postoperative discomfort, a shorter hospital stay, a better cos-
metic result and a brief convalescence. The major drawback to
19. Wagle, D. G., More, R. H. and Murphy, G .P.: Primary carcinoma
of the renal pelvis. Cancer, 33: 1642, 1974