3862
M. L. Wrobleski et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 3859–3863
References and notes
Ph
F3C
O
1. (a) Duffy, R. A. Exp. Opin. Emerg. Drugs 2004, 9, 9; (b)
Seward, E. M.; Swain, C. J. Exp. Opin. Ther. Patent 1999,
9, 571.
2. (a) Owens, A. P.; Williams, B. J.; Harrison, T.; Swain, C.
J.; Baker, R.; Sadowski, S.; Cascieri, M. A. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 1995, 5, 2761; (b) Swain, C. J.; Cascieri, M.
A.; Owens, A.; Saari, W.; Sadowski, S.; Strader, C.; Teall,
M.; Van Neil, M. B.; Williams, B. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 1994, 4, 2161.
NHBn
O
CF3
OH
10
b
Ph
O
Ph
F3C
F3C
a
O
O
3. Owens, A. P.; Harrison, T.; Moseley, J. D.; Swain, C. J.;
Sadowski, S.; Cascieri, M. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
1998, 8, 51.
NHBn
NC
CF3
CF3
3a
9
4. (a) Shue, H.-J.; Chen, X.; Shih, N-Y.; Blythin, D. J.;
Paliwal, S.; Lin, L.; Gu, D.; Schwerdt, J. H.; Shah, S.;
Reichard, G. A.; Piwinski, J. J.; Duffy, R. A.; Lachowicz,
J. E.; Coffin, V. L.; Liu, F.; Nomeir, A. A.; Morgan, C. A.;
Varty, G. B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 3896; (b)
Harrison, T.; Williams, B. J.; Swain, C. J. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 1994, 4, 2733; (c) Harrison, T.; Williams, B. J.;
Swain, C. J.; Ball, R. G. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1994, 4,
2545.
c
Ph
Ph
F3C
F3C
O
O
O
NH
NH
O
CF3
CF3
N
N
O
O
H
H
11a
11b
5. Stevenson, G. I.; MacLeod, A. M.; Huscroft, I.; Cascieri,
M. A.; Sadowski, S.; Baker, R. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38,
1264.
d, e
6. (a) Shue, H.-J.; Chen, X.; Schwerdt, J. H.; Paliwal, S.;
Blythin, D. J.; Lin, L.; Gu, D.; Wang, C.; Reichard, G. A.;
Wang, H.; Piwinski, J. J.; Duffy, R. A.; Lachowicz, J. E.;
Coffin, V. L.; Nomeir, A. A.; Morgan, C. A.; Varty, G. B.;
Shih, N-Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 1065; (b)
Swain, C. J.; Baker, W. R.; Cascieri, M. A.; Chicchi, G.;
Forrest, M.; Herbert, R.; Keown, L.; Ladduwahetty, T.;
Luell, S.; MacIntyre, D. E.; Metzger, J.; Morton, S.;
Owens, A. P.; Sadowski, S.; Watt, A. P. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 1997, 7, 2959.
Ph
Ph
F3C
F3C
f, g
O
O
NHBoc
R1
O
R2
CF3
CF3
OH
12
3i,k,m-o
Ph
F3C
d-g
O
11b
7. For more experimental details, see: Wrobleski, M. L.;
Reichard, G. A.; Shih, N.-Y.; Xiao, D. PCT Int. Appl.
WO 078376, 2003.
R1
R2
CF3
3j,l
8. Reichard, G. A.; Stengone, C.; Paliwal, S.; Mergelsberg,
I.; Majmundar, S.; Wang, C.; Tiberi, R.; McPhail, A. T.;
Piwinski, J. J.; Shih, N.-Y. Org. Lett. 2003, 23, 4249.
9. Schlosser, M.; Schaub, B. Chimia 1982, 36, 396.
10. Cowden, C. J.; Wilson, R. D.; Bishop, B. C.; Cottrell, I.
F.; Davies, A. J.; Dolling, U.-H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000,
41, 8661.
11. NK1 binding assay: Binding data are the average of two or
three independent determinations. Receptor binding assay
was performed on membrane preparations from CHO
cells in which recombinant human NK1 receptor was
expressed. [3H]-Sar-Met Substance P was used as the
ligand for the NK1 assay, at concentrations near the
experimentally derived Kd value. Ki values were obtained
using the Cheng and Prusoff equation.12
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) NaCN, BnNH2, AcOH,
MeOH, reflux, 19 h, 98%; (b) acidic or basic hydrolysis; (c) i—KCN,
(NH4)2CO3, EtOH/H2O (1:1), steel bomb, 90 °C, 36 h; ii—separation
of isomers, 11a (46%) and 11b (43%); (d) (Boc)2O, DMAP, THF, rt,
3 h, then 1 M aq LiOH, THF, rt, 24 h; (e) (Boc)2O, satd aq NaHCO3,
THF, rt, 24 h, (88%) over two-steps; (f) PyBOP, i-Pr2EtN, CH2Cl2,
0 °C, 30 min then rt, 1 h, then appropriate amine, rt, 24 h; (g) TFA,
CH2Cl2, rt, 24 h, 60–80% over two-steps.
(3n,o) was found to decrease GFT activity. Overall,
the 1,1-disubstituted acyclic amide cyclobutane
analogues (e.g., 3i,k,m) displayed superior oral in vivo
activity than the 1-monosubstituted compounds
despite the reduced binding affinity.19
12. Cascieri, M. A.; Macleod, A. M.; Underwood, D.; Shiao,
L.-L.; Ber, E.; Sadowski, S.; Yu, H.; Merchant, K. J.;
Swain, C. J.; Strader, C. D.; Fong, T. M. J. Biol. Chem.
1994, 269, 6587.
In conclusion, we have identified a novel series of
cyclobutane derivatives as potent and selective NK1
antagonists.20 The initial lead (compound 3b,
Ki = 0.02 nM) was optimized to afford compounds
with good CNS penetration and oral in vivo activity.
The 1,1-disubstituted amine-amide analogues 3i and
3k provided the best combination of high NK1 affin-
ity (Ki = 1 nM) and excellent in vivo GFT activity
(>80% inhibition at 1 mg/kg after a 4 h pretreatment).
Further details of the SAR effort to improve potency
in this class of NK1 antagonists will be reported in
due course.
13. The NK1 agonist GR73632 (3 pmol in 5 ll) was admin-
istered centrally to female Mongolian gerbils via icv
injection. Immediately following recovery from the anes-
thesia, gerbils were placed into clear Plexiglas boxes for
5 min, and the duration of foot-tapping was measured.
Foot-tapping was defined as rhythmic, repetitive tapping
of the hind feet. NK1 antagonists were administered orally
in 0.4% methylcellulose in distilled water at a dose of 1 mg/
kg (unless otherwise stated) at various pretreatment times
prior to injection of GR73632. Data are expressed as a
percent decrease (% inhibition) in the amount of time