colored product was produced in low yield. We found that
a stoichiometric amount of NBS in the bromination and
catalytic Et3N for the isomerization produced much cleaner
product in acceptable yield. The (Z)-olefin geometry was
based on literature precedents for similar compounds.10
Cross-coupling9 of 11 with alkyne 8 [0.002 equiv of Pd-
(Ph3P)4, 0.02 equiv of CuI, Et3N) furnished enyne 12 in 90%
yield, which was purified by crystallization of the corre-
sponding MSA salt 12a. The geometry of the olefin was
preserved during the coupling and purification operations.9
Saturation of 12 via catalytic hydrogenation was initially
problematic due to competing hydrogenolysis of the glycine
subunit (to produce 13b) as well as general catalyst poison-
ing.11 Employment of the MSA salt 12a effectively neutral-
ized the issue of catalyst poisoning; however, the hydro-
genolysis side reaction remained significant (10-30%) when
using Rh-Al2O3 or Pt-C catalysts. After considerable
experimentation, we found that reduction of 12a over 5%
Rh-C at 0 °C effectively minimized hydrogenolysis to ∼2%.
Crystallization of the resulting salt 13c efficiently purged
low levels of 13b. Saponification of this material (2.1 equiv
of LiOH, aq THF) formed the amino acid, which was isolated
as the hydrochloride salt 14 and then cyclized (EDC, HOBT,
DIPEA) to azepinone 15a. Selective removal of the Boc
protecting group in the presence of the tert-butyl ester was
unsuccessful using formic acid, TFA, or HCl under a variety
of conditions.12 However, reaction with MSA (aq EtOH)
produced racemic R-aminoazepinone 15b with high selectiv-
ity in 75% overall yield from 13c.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Racemic R-Aminoazepinone 15b via
Enyne 12 and Its Dynamic Resolution to 6ba
Dynamic resolution comprises the preferential crystalliza-
tion of an enantiomer (or diastereomeric salt) with concomi-
tant racemization of the undesired enantiomer in solution,
and, in principle, can reach 100% efficiency.13 Armstrong13e
and Wetter13f have reported dynamic resolutions of phenyl-
ring fused R-aminoazepinones. In these examples, racem-
ization of the unwanted enantiomer was brought about via
enolization of the azomethine formed with 2-hydroxy-5-nitro
benzaldehyde (HNB) used in catalytic amounts.
a Reaction conditions: (a) BrCH2CO2-t-Bu, THF. (b) MsCl, Et3N,
CH2Cl2. (c) NBS, Et3N. (d) Pd(PPh3)4, CuI, Et3N. (e) MSA. (f)
H2, 5% Rh/C, MeOH. (g) LiOH, THF (aq). (h) HCl (aq). (i) EDC,
HOBT, DIPEA. (j) MSA, EtOH (aq); NaOH (aq), EtOAc. (k) (R)-
CSA, 2-hydrozy-5-nitro-benzaldehyde, toluene, 70 °C; NaOH (aq),
EtOAc.
Following these leads, a dynamic resolution of 15b was
developed by systematically screening the relative solubilities
of diastereomeric salts derived from a variety of acids.14,15
of 15b to (S)-R-aminoazepinone 6b. In this approach, the
azepinone ring nitrogen is introduced at the correct oxidation
state.
Thus, N-alkylation of commercially available 1,1-dimeth-
ylpropargylamine 7 with tert-butyl bromoacetate formed ester
8 in 93% yield. Vinyl bromide 11 was prepared from N-(t-
butoxycarbonyl)-L-serine methyl ester 9 by dehydration
(MsCl, Et3N, CH2Cl2) followed by bromination and isomer-
ization (NBS, Et3N).9f,10 Under the literature9f conditions,
which employed excess reagents for similar conversions,
(10) (a) Yamada, M.; Nakao, K.; Fukui, T.; Nunami, K. Tetrahedron
1996, 52, 5751. (b) Das, J.; Reid, J. A.; Kronenthal, D. R.; Singh, J.;
Pansegrau, P. D.; Mueller, R. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 7835.
(11) Misiti, D.; Zappia, G.; Monache, G. D. Synthesis 1999, 873 and
references therein.
(12) Gibson, F. S.; Bergmeier, S. C.; Rappoport, H. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 3216 and references therein.
(13) (a) Dinh, P. M.; Williams, J. M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 749.
(b) Shieh, W. C.; Carlson, J. A.; Zaunius, G. M. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
8271. (c) Caddick, S.; Jenkins, K. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1996, 447. (d) Stock,
H. T.; Turner, N. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 6575. (e) Armstrong, J.
D.; Eng, K. K.; Keller, J. L.; Purick, R. M.; Hartner, F. W.; Choi, W. B.;
Askin, D.; Volante, R. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 3239. (f) Boyer, S.
K.; Pfund, R. A.; Portmann, R. E.; Sedelmeier, G. H.; Wetter, H. F. HelV.
Chim. Acta 1988, 71, 337. (g) Reider, P. J.; Davis, P.; Hughes, D. L.;
Grabowski, E. J. J. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 955. (h) Boyle, W. J.; Sifniades,
S.; Peppen, J. F. V. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 4841. (i) Konoike, T.;
Matsumura, K.; Yorifugi, T.; Shinomoto, S.; Ide, Y.; Ohya, T. J. Org. Chem.
2002, 67, 7741.
(9) (a) Thorand, S.; Krause, N. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 8551. (b) Miller,
M. W.; Johnson, C. R. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 1582. (c) Nussbaumer, P.;
Leitner; I.; Mraz; K.; Stutz, A. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 1831. (d)
Mladenova, M.; Alami, M.; Linstrumelle, G. Synth. Comm. 1995, 25, 1401.
(e) Meijere, A.; Meyer, F. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 2379.
(f) Miossec, B.; Danion-Bougot, R.; Danion, D. Synthesis 1994, 1171. (g)
Wender, P. A.; Tebbe, M. J. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 1419. (h) Cassar, L. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1975, 93, 253. (j) Dieck, H. A.; Heck, F. R. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1975, 93, 259. (j) Sonogashira, K.; Tohda, Y.; Hagihara,
N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 16, 4467. (k) Stephens, R. D.; Castro, C. E. J.
Org. Chem. 1963, 28, 3313. (l) Liu, C. Y.; Luh, T. Y. Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
4305.
(14) (a) Classical resolution14b of racemic 15b with D-tartaric acid and
(R)-CSA gave the corresponding salts in 30% (99% ee) and 44% (99.8%
ee) yields (50% theoretical maximum), respectively. (b) Brenner, M.;
Rickenbacher, H. R. HelV. Chim. Acta 1958, 21, 181.
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 17, 2003
3157