Electron Transfer in Fluorinated Cobalt Porphyrins
1
generally low spin (S ) /2), removal of an electron from
kinetic rate constants for the metal-centered (Co2+/3+) oxida-
tion are unusually small and very sensitive to the degree of
fluorine substitution. These results contrast with electro-
chemical studies of â-brominated Co2+ tetraarylporphyrins,
which show halogen substitution correlated with an increase
in kel for the Co2+/3+ couple.39 The juxtaposition of these
studies generates an interesting puzzle: why should appar-
ently similar â-octahalogenated ligand systems give rise to
such different ET kinetic behavior for the chelated cobalt
ion? The answer to this question provides a general design
strategy for manipulating ET rate constants in metallopor-
phyrins.
2
the predominantly dz -character HOMO results in large
changes in the bonding about the cobalt ion, including
significant alteration of the metal-nitrogen bond distances
and an associated contraction of the macrocycle framework
around the smaller ion.
Due to their more positive redox potentials and higher
stability compared to their nonhalogenated counterparts,
metalloporphyrins possessing halogen (F, Cl, Br) at the
pyrrole (â) positions and/or meso-haloaryl or meso-haloalkyl
substituents have garnered interest as potential catalysts for
the oxidation of organic substrates, including alkane hy-
droxylation and alkene epoxidation.12-34 Recently, we re-
ported the synthesis and unusual properties of â-octafluori-
nated porphyrins and their zinc, cobalt, and rhodium
derivatives.35-38 A key advantage offered by fluorine sub-
stituents is that their relatively small size allows electronic
effects to be studied independently of the profound steric
and/or conformational perturbations that are seen with larger
halogens. Here, we show that the magnitudes of the ET
Experimental Section
Materials. Materials were obtained from Aldrich Chemical Co.,
unless otherwise noted. Benzonitrile and deuterated benzene
(Cambridge Isotope Laboratories) were distilled under reduced
pressure from P2O5 and redistilled from CaH2. Acetonitrile was
distilled from P2O5 and redistilled from AgPF6. Pyridine and CH2-
Cl2 were distilled from CaH2. Tetra-n-butylammonium hexafluo-
rophosphate (TBAPF6) (Fluka) was thrice recrystallized from
acetone/ether and dried under vacuum (18 h, 40 °C) prior to use.
Hexafluorobenzene was used as an internal chemical shift reference
(δ ) -164.9 ppm) for 19F NMR experiments. All other reagents
were of analytical grade. CoF8TPP, CoF28TPP, and CoF20TPP were
synthesized by literature procedures.37 CoTPP was recrystallized
from toluene before use.
(11) Sun, J.; Su, C.; Wishart, J. F. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 5893-5901.
(12) Chauhan, S. M. S.; Kandadai, S. A.; Sahoo, B. Chem. Pharm. Bull.
2001, 49, 1375-1376.
(13) Gonsalves, A. M. d. A. R.; Serra, A. C. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines
2000, 4, 598-603.
(14) Hino, F.; Dolphin, D. Chem. Commun. 1999, 629-630.
(15) Birnbaum, E. R.; Le Lacheur, R. M.; Horton, A. C.; Tumas, W. J.
Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1999, 139, 11-24.
Instrumentation and Methods. Electrochemical experiments
were performed with either a computer-controlled EG&G PARC
M273 potentiostat with M270 electrochemical software or with an
EG&G PARC M173 potentiostat. For cyclic voltammetry, a three-
electrode system consisting of a planar platinum working electrode
(EG&G, 0.0314 cm2), a platinum wire counter electrode, and a
reference electrode was employed. The reference electrode was
either Ag/Ag+ (0.01 M AgNO3 in CH3CN with 0.1 M TBAPF6) or
a silver wire quasi-reference electrode. The observed potential was
(16) Groves, J. T.; Shalyaev, K. V.; Bonchio, M.; Carofiglio, T. Stud. Surf.
Sci. Catal. 1997, 110, 865-872.
(17) Boettcher, A.; Birnbaum, E. R.; Day, M. W.; Gray, H. B.; Grinstaff,
M. W.; Labinger, J. A. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1997, 117, 229-
242.
(18) Iwanejko, R.; Battioni, P.; Mansuy, D.; Mlodnicka, T. J. Mol. Catal.
A: Chem. 1996, 111, 7-9.
(19) Battioni, P.; Iwanejko, R.; Mansuy, D.; Mlodnicka, T.; Poltowicz, J.;
Sanchez, F. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1996, 109, 91-98.
(20) Lyons, J. E.; Ellis, P. E., Jr.; Myers, H. K., Jr. J. Catal. 1995, 155,
59-73.
corrected by comparison to an internal standard, Fc/Fc+ (E1/2
)
(21) Labinger, J. A. Catal. Lett. 1994, 26, 95-9.
(22) Chen, H. L.; Ellis, P. E., Jr.; Wijesekera, T.; Hagan, T. E.; Groh, S.
E.; Lyons, J. E.; Ridge, D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1086-9.
(23) Battioni, P.; Bartoli, J. F.; Mansuy, D.; Byun, Y. S.; Traylor, T. G. J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992, 1051-3.
151 ( 3 mV vs Ag/Ag+). All potentials reported in this paper are
referenced to the Ag/Ag+ couple. The working electrode was
polished and cleaned ultrasonically prior to each use. In situ UV-
vis and FTIR spectroelectrochemical experiments were performed
with an optically transparent, adjustable path length, thin-layer
spectroelectrochemical cell.40 A Pt grid was used as the working
electrode; two Pt sheets were used as the counter electrode. UV-
vis spectra were recorded on an Olis-14 modification of a Cary-14
spectrophotometer. The bulk electrolysis cell possessed two cham-
bers separated by a fine fritted disk. Two large area Pt grid
electrodes were used as working and counter electrodes. A
homemade Ag/Ag+ (0.01 M AgNO3 in CH3CN including 0.1 M
TBAPF6) reference electrode was separated from the bulk of the
solution by a Luggin capillary containing TBAPF6 (0.5 M) in
benzonitrile. UV-vis spectra after bulk electrolysis were determined
in a Schlenk-style cell and compared with the in situ spectroelec-
trochemical results. Digisim 3.05 software (Bioanalytical Systems
Inc.) was used for cyclic voltammetric digital simulation.
(24) Traylor, T. G.; Hill, K. W.; Fann, W. P.; Tsuchiya, S.; Dunlap, B. E.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1308-12.
(25) Ellis, P. E., Jr.; Lyons, J. E. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1990, 105, 181-93.
(26) Ellis, P. E., Jr.; Lyons, J. E. Prepr.sAm. Chem. Soc., DiV. Pet. Chem.
1990, 35, 174-8.
(27) Moore, K. T.; Horvath, I. T.; Therien, M. J. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39,
3125-3139.
(28) Moore, K. T.; Fletcher, J. T.; Therien, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 5196-5209.
(29) Goll, J. G.; Moore, K. T.; Ghosh, A.; Therien, M. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 8344-8354.
(30) DiMagno, S. G.; Wertsching, A. K.; Ross, C. R., II. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1995, 117, 8279-80.
(31) DiMagno, S. G.; Williams, R. A.; Therien, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 6943-8.
(32) Leroy, J.; Bondon, A.; Toupet, L.; Rolando, C. Chem.sEur. J. 1997,
3, 1890-1893.
(33) Porhiel, E.; Bondon, A.; Leroy, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 4829-
4830.
(34) Porhiel, E.; Bondon, A.; Leroy, J. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 1097-
1105.
(35) Smirnov, V. V.; Woller, E. K.; Tatman, D.; DiMagno, S. G. Inorg.
Chem. 2001, 40, 2614-2619.
(36) Nelson, A. P.; DiMagno, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8569-
Further experimental details concerning the X-ray crystal struc-
ture determination, stopped-flow kinetic runs, Marcus cross-
8570.
(39) D’Souza, F.; Villard, A.; Van Caemelbecke, E.; Franzen, M.; Boschi,
T.; Tagliatesta, P.; Kadish, K. M. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 4042-8.
(40) Sun, H.-R.; Zhang, S.-Y.; Xu, J.-Q.; Yang, G.-Y.; Shi, T.-S. J.
Electroanal. Chem. 1998, 455, 57-68.
(37) Smirnov, V. V.; Woller, E. K.; DiMagno, S. G. Inorg. Chem. 1998,
37, 4971-4978.
(38) Woller, E. K.; DiMagno, S. G. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 1588-1593.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 42, No. 19, 2003 6033