insertion of nitriles into a C-Pd bond assisted by the ortho-
hydroxy group.3k
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions for the Addition
of PhB(OH)2 to Phenylacetonitrilea
Our group has reported the Pd(II)-catalyzed intramolecular
addition of vinylpalladium species to the nitrile groups in
the presence of 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy) as the ligand.4 Recently,
we also reported the Pd(OAc)2-catalyzed addition of aryl-
boronic acids to nitriles in the presence of bpy.5 In both
reactions, bpy is crucial for the reactions implying that the
presence of bpy can stabilize the arylpalladium species and
increase its reactivity.
Compared to the neutral palladium species, the cationic
palladium species has vacant coordination sites and shows
a harder metal property.6,7 It occurred to us that the cationic
palladium complexes might also catalyze the addition of
arylboronic acids to nitriles due to their high Lewis acid
property. We report herein the cationic palladium complex
catalyzed addition of arylboronic acids to nitriles and the
one-step synthesis of benzofuran derivatives.
First, (dppp)Pd2+(H2O)2(-OTf)2 (catalyst A)8 was used as
the catalyst in this reaction. Unfortunately, the reaction
mixtures became dark quickly in THF or in CH3NO2 with
low yields of products (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). In our
previous work, we reported that the ligand bpy is crucial
for the reaction.4 The cationic palladium complexes contain-
ing bpy as the ligand, [(bpy)Pd+(µ-OH)]2(-OTf)2 (catalyst
B) and [(bpy)Pd2+(H2O)2](-OTf)2 (catalyst C), were chosen
as the catalysts.9,10a To our delight, the catalysts were
effective and the reaction could take place without any
protection from air and moisture. After screening the solvent,
we found that the best result could be obtained in CH3NO2
(Table 1, entry 9). It is worth noting that water could be
used as the solvent for this reaction (Table 1, entry 8).
entry
Pd catalyst
solvent
yieldc (%)
1
2
3
Ab
Ab
B
THF
21
19
67
CH3NO2
HOAc/THF/H2O
(0.5:0.25:0.15, v/v/v)
HOAc
4
5
6
7
8
9d
10
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
23
78
43
51
85
94
73
THF
dioxane
iPrOH
H2O
CH3NO2
CH3NO2/dioxane
(8:1, v/v)
DMF
11
12
B
B
36
26
DMSO
a Reaction conditions: PhB(OH)2 (1.5 mmol), phenylacetonitrile (0.5
mmol), [(bpy)Pd+(µ-OH)]2(-OTf)2 (catalyst B, 3.5 mol %) in solvent (2
mL) at 80 °C for 2 days. b 5 mol %. c Isolated yield. d 30 h.
With the optimized conditions in hand, the scope of the
reaction was studied as shown in Table 3. The yields in most
cases are higher than that using Pd(OAc)2 as the catalyst as
we reported recently.5 Arylboronic acids with electron-
donating groups gave better yields than those with electron-
withdrawing groups (Table 3, entries 2, 3, and 6). It is worth
noting that those groups, which are reactive in the presence
of Grignard reagents or lithium reagents such as the nitro,
hydroxyl, and acetate groups (AcO-), could tolerate the
reaction conditions (Table 3, entries 9-12). It is especially
attractive that the reaction behaves with high chemoselec-
tivity between nitrile groups and Br- or TfO- groups which
The influence of the amount of the phenylboronic acids
is shown in Table 2. A high yield was also obtained even
using 2 equiv of phenylboronic acid reacting at 80 °C (Table
2, entry 3). Under reflux conditions, the amount of phenyl-
boronic acid could be reduced to 1.5 equiv and the loading
of the catalyst could be reduced to 1 mol % with not much
change in the yield (Table 2, entry 6).
(4) Zhao, L.; Lu, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4343.
(5) Zhao, B.; Lu, X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 6765.
(6) For reactions catalyzed by cationic palladium species, see: (a)
Yamamoto, A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1995, 500, 337. (b) Coates, G. W.
Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 1223. (c) Widenhoefer, R. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002,
35, 905. (d) Sodeoka, M.; Hamashima, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2005, 78,
941. (e) Mikami, K.; Hatano, M.; Akiyama, K. Top. Organomet. Chem.
2005, 14, 279 and references therein.
(7) For the reaction of arylboronic acids with a cationic palladium
catalyst, see: (a) Nishikata, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Miyaura, N. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2768. (b) Nishikata, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Miyaura, N.
Organometallics 2004, 23, 4317.
Table 2. [(bpy)Pd+(µ-OH)]2(-OTf)2-Catalyzed Addition of
PhB(OH)2 to Phenylacetonitrilea
PhB(OH)2
(equiv)
catalyst
(mol %)
t
time
(h)
yieldb
(%)
entry
(°C)
(8) Stang, P. J.; Cao, D. H.; Poulter, G. T.; Arif, A. M. Organometallics
1995, 14, 1110.
1
2
3
4
5
6
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
1.0
80
80
80
80
reflux
reflux
48
48
48
48
24
24
94
89
87
77
92
91
(9) Catalyst B is very stable to air and moisture. 1H NMR spectra showed
clearly the bridged OH in catalyst B at 3.34 and 2.79 ppm. Its structure
was confirmed by X-ray crystallography (see Supporting Information).10a
Catalyst C showed 1H NMR spectra identical with those of the reported
data.10b Catalyst B and catalyst C can be converted to each other under the
acidic or basic conditions according to the literature.10c
(10) Complex [(bpy)Pd+(µ-OH)]2(-OTf)2 has been reported in the
literature, but no X-ray crystallographic data were given. See: (a) Vicente,
J.; Abad, J.-A.; Gil-Rubio, J. Organometallics 1996, 15, 3509. (b) Aeby,
A.; Consiglio, G. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1999, 296, 45. (c) Wimmer, S.; Castan,
P.; Wimmer, F. L.; Johnson, N. P. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1988, 142, 13.
a Reaction conditions: PhB(OH)2, phenylacetonitrile (0.5 mmol),
[(bpy)Pd+(µ-OH)]2(-OTf)2 (catalyst B) in CH3NO2 (2 mL). b Isolated yield.
5988
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 26, 2006