of an arylpalladium,8 arylradical,9 or aryllithium10 tethered
to methylene cyclohexane. Very recently, an efficient method
for constituting this skeleton by intramolecular Friedel-
Crafts cyclization of 1,3-bis-exocyclic diene has been
reported.11 We selected the strategy based on palladium-
catalyzed reductive cyclization8 of a substituted 2-(2-bro-
mobenzyl) methylene cyclohexane, which appeared to be the
most attractive.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Phenol 18a
The synthesis began with the preparation of the appropriate
benzyl bromide 11 from vanillin using a standard sequence
of reactions that proceeded through the known12 aldehyde 7
(Scheme 1). We sought to prepare the (o-bromobenzyl)-
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Aromatic Bromide 11
the heavily oxygenated aromatic ring. To our satisfaction,
however, the alkylated methyl ester 13b, obtained in 92%
yield from the methyl ester analogue 12b14 of Hagemann’s
ester, underwent smooth hydrolysis with aqueous methanolic
LiOH, and the resulting crude acid on heating with a slurry
of silica gel in CH2Cl2 produced the desired cyclohexenone
14 through decarboxylation. Wittig olefination of 15 pro-
ceeded uneventfully, producing the alkene 16 in good overall
yield.
Conversion of the bicyclic intermediate to a tricyclic
product was next accomplished via Pd(0)-catalyzed cycliza-
tion in the presence of a hydride donor.8,15 This gave an
inseparable mixture of the epimeric hydrofluorenes 17a and
17b in a ratio of ca. 85:15 in 60% yield. A separation of the
epimers could, however, be realized after deprotection of
the O-benzyl ether mixture and recrystallization of the
resulting product, which afforded the major epimer 18a (mp
94 °C), assigned cis stereochemistry by analogy.8 The minor
epimer 18b could not be isolated in pure form.
cyclohexanone 15, a key intermediate for the olefin 16
(Scheme 2), from the cyclohexenone 14 by an established
route13 involving conjugate addition of a methyl group. While
alkylation of Hagemann’s ester 12a gave the alkylated
product6b,13 13a in 75% yield, its attempted hydrolytic
decarboxylation under the usual condition6b,13 of refluxing
with aqueous ethanolic KOH gave a complex mixture of
products presumably due to oxidative side reactions involving
(6) (a) Ghatak, U. R.; Chakravarty, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966, 7, 2449-
2458. (b) Ghatak, U. R.; Chakravarty, J.; Banerjee, A. K. Tetrahedron 1968,
24, 1577-1593. (c) Ghatak, U. R.; Chakravarty, J.; Dasgupta, R.;
Chakraborti, P. C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1975, 2438-2445. (d)
Chakravarty, J.; Dasgupta, R.; Ray, J. K.; Ghatak, U. R. Proc. Indian Acad.
Sci. 1977, 86A, 317-325. (e) Chakarborti, P. C.; Ghosh, S.; Kanjilal, P.
R.; Satyanarayana, G. O. S. V.; Ghatak, U. R. Indian J. Chem. 1979, 18B,
183-185.
With the tricyclic product 18a in hand as a single epimer,
our next task was to introduce an isopropyl group in the
aromatic ring and to convert the benzylic methylene group
to a ketone. This was best achieved via the sequence of
reactions described in Scheme 3. Thus, acetylation of 18a
followed by Fries rearrangement16 of the acetate 19 furnished
(7) Angle, S. R.; Arnaiz, D. O. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 5937-5947.
(8) Mukhopadhyaya, J. K.; Pal, S.; Ghatak, U. R. Synth. Commun. 1995,
25, 1641-1657.
(9) (a) Ishibashi, H.; Kobayashi, T.; Nakashima, S.; Tamura, O. J. Org.
Chem. 2000, 65, 9022-9027. (b) Ishibashi, H.; Kobayashi, T.; Takamasu,
D. Synlett 1999, 1286-1288.
(10) Bailey, W. F.; Daskapan, T.; Rampalli, S. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
1334-1338.
(11) Lomberget, T.; Bentz, E.; Bouyssi, D.; Blame, G. Org. Lett. 2003,
5, 2055-2057.
(14) Begbie, A. L.; Golding, B. T. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1972,
602-605.
(15) Link, J. T. Org. React. 2002, 60, 157-534.
(16) (a) Gammill, R. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 1385-1388. (b)
Blatt, A. H. Org. React. 1942, 1, 342-369.
(12) Burger, A. P. N.; Brandt, E. V.; Roux, D. G. Phytochemistry 1983,
22, 2813-2817.
(13) Pal, S.; Mukhopadhyaya, J. K.; Ghatak, U. R. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 2687-2694.
3932
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 21, 2003