1360
T. Nishimura et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 1357–1360
Figure 3. In vivo efficacy data of compound 18 in male Wistar rat OGTT23. (a) Plasma glucose lowering and (b) AUC reduction. ‘Ã’ Values of p < 0.05 were considered
statistically significant for vehicle group.
M.; Reynet, C.; Schofield, K. L.; Shah, V. K.; Spindler, F.; Taylor, A.; Turton, R.;
Williams, G. M.; Wong-Kai-In, P.; Yasuda, K. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 4340.
12. Sarabu, R.; Grimsby, J. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Dev. 2005, 8, 631.
(OGTT), oral administration of compound 18 demonstrated glu-
cose-lowering efficacy in a dose-dependent manner, and showed
significant reduction of plasma glucose levels at 10 and 30 mg/kg
(Fig. 3).23
In conclusion, we have identified a series of 2-amino benzamides
as small molecule allosteric activators of glucokinase. The binding
mode of these molecules was revealed and detailed SAR on GK acti-
vation was developed and analyzed. The triazole compound 18 was
developed and has demonstrated promising in vivo glucose-lower-
ingeffectsinanacuteratmodel. FurthermodificationsandSARstud-
ies based on the crystal structure analyses are subjects for future
investigation and will be reported in due course.
13. Guertin, K. R.; Grimsby, J. Curr. Med. Chem. 2006, 13, 1839.
14. Coghlan, M.; Leighton, B. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2008, 17, 145.
15. Sarabu, R.; Berthel, S. J.; Kester, R. F.; Tilley, J. W. Expert Opin. Ther. Patents 2008,
18, 759.
16. Futamura, M.; Hosaka, H.; Kadotani, A.; Shimazaki, H.; Sasaki, K.; Ohyama, S.;
Nishimura, T.; Eiki, J.; Nagata, Y. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 37668.
17. Kamata, K.; Mitsuya, M.; Nishimura, T.; Eiki, J.; Nagata, Y. Structure 2004, 12,
429.
18. Glucokinase activities were measured by the glucose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenase coupled continuous spectrophotometric assay. EC50 values
were designated as concentration of compounds which give half of maximal
increased enzymatic activities of glucokinase by the compound at 2.5 and
10 mM glucose. Compound 18 was used an internal control across all assay
plates for data validation. The EC50 values of this compound are 0.42 0.09 and
0.14 0.04 lM at 2.5 and 10 mM glucose, respectively. All compounds in this
References and notes
series investigated exhibited equivalent Emax values to the maximal response
evoked by compound 18 (8.0- to 8.3-fold and 1.6- to 1.8-fold over control
levels at 2.5 and 10 mM glucose). Detailed assay methods and conditions are
described in Ref. 16.
1. Printz, R. L.; Magnuson, M. A.; Granner, D. K. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1993, 13, 463.
2. Matschinsky, F. M. Diabetes 1996, 45, 223.
19. Protein and crystals were obtained according to established procedures.17
Crystals were soaked in 0.5 mM compound 18 overnight in mother liquor
containing 5% DMSO. Diffraction data were collected on beamline BL32B2 at
the SPring-8, at 100 K (a Rigaku R-axis V image plate). Data processing and data
reduction were carried out using programs from the HKL2000 (HKL Research,
Inc.) and the CCP4 package. Compound 18 was modeled into the electron
density using Afitt (OpenEye Scientific Software). The protein–compound
complex model was refined using CNX (Accelrys), and the final structure has
been deposited in the Protein Data Bank with the deposition code 3FR0
together with structure factors and detailed experimental conditions.
20. Crystallographic statistics for the GK-compound 18 complex are as follows:
space group P6522, unit cell 84.1, 84.1, 323.2 Å, resolution 2.70 Å, 17,901
reflections from 361,813 observations give 99.8% completeness with Rsym of
3. Matschinsky, F. M.; Glaser, B.; Magnuson, M. A. Diabetes 1998, 47, 307.
4. Grimsby, J.; Sarabu, R.; Corbett, W. L.; Haynes, N. E.; Bizzarro, F. T.; Coffey, J. W.;
Guertin, K. R.; Hilliard, D. W.; Kester, R. F.; Mahaney, P. E.; Marcus, L.; Qi, L. D.;
Spence, C. L.; Tengi, J.; Magnuson, M. A.; Chu, C. A.; Dvorozniak, M. T.;
Matschinsky, F. M.; Grippo, J. F. Science 2003, 301, 370.
5. Efanov, A. M.; Barrett, D. G.; Brenner, M. B.; Briggs, S. L.; Delaunois, A.; Durbin, J.
D.; Giese, U.; Guo, H. H.; Radloff, M.; Gil, G. S.; Sewing, S.; Wang, Y.; Weichert,
A.; Zaliani, A.; Gromada, J. Endocrinology 2005, 146, 3696.
6. Coope, G. J.; Atkinson, A. M.; Allott, C.; McKerrecher, D.; Johnstone, C.; Pike, K.
G.; Holme, P. C.; Vertigan, H.; Gill, D.; Coghlan, M. P.; Leighton, B. Br. J.
Pharmacol. 2006, 149, 328.
7. Fyfe, M. C. T.; White, J. R.; Taylor, A.; Chatfield, R.; Wargent, E.; Printz, R. L.;
Sulpice, T.; McCormack, J. G.; Procter, M. J.; Reynet, C.; Widdowson, P. S.;
Wong-Kai-In, P. Diabetologia 2007, 50, 1277.
6.2% and mean I/r(I) of 9.2. The final model containing 3506 protein, 135
8. McKerrecher, D.; Allen, J. V.; Bowker, S. S.; Boyd, S.; Caulkett, P. W. R.; Currie, G.
S.; Davies, C. D.; Fenwick, M. L.; Gaskin, H.; Grange, E.; Hargreaves, R. B.; Hayter,
B. R.; James, R.; Johnson, K. M.; Johnstone, C.; Jones, C. D.; Lackie, S.; Rayner, J.
W.; Walker, R. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 2103.
water, 1 salt, 12 glucose and 26 compound atoms has an R-factor of 22.1% (Rfree
using 5% of the data 27.5%). Mean temperature factors for the protein and the
ligand are 44.4 and 33.3 Å2, respectively.
21. Collaborative. Acta Crystallogr. D 1994, 50, 760.
9. McKerrecher, D.; Allen, J. V.; Caulkett, P. W. R.; Donald, C. S.; Fenwick, M. L.;
Grange, E.; Johnson, K. M.; Johnstone, C.; Jones, C. D.; Pike, K. G.; Rayner, J. W.;
Walker, R. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 2705.
10. Castelhano, A. L.; Dong, H. Q.; Fyfe, M. C. T.; Gardner, L. S.; Kamikozawa, Y.;
Kurabayashi, S.; Nawano, M.; Ohashi, R.; Procter, M. J.; Qiu, L.; Rasamison, C.
M.; Schofield, K. L.; Shah, V. K.; Ueta, K.; Williams, G. M.; Witter, D.; Yasuda, K.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 1501.
22. PyMOL molecular graphics system, DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA. Available
23. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT); Nine-week-old male Wistar rats fasted
overnight before performing the test. The rats were orally administered
compound 18 or vehicle alone (0.5% methylcellulose solution) followed
30 min later by an oral glucose challenge (2 g/kg). Plasma glucose
concentrations were measured just prior to and following the glucose
challenge (30, 60, 90, and 120 min). AUC values were calculated from the
data (from À30 to 120 min).
11. Bertram, L. S.; Black, D.; Briner, P. H.; Chatfield, R.; Cooke, A.; Fyfe, M. C. T.;
Murray, P. J.; Naud, F.; Nawano, M.; Procter, M. J.; Rakipovski, G.; Rasamison, C.