Angewandte
Chemie
Olovsson, J. R. Scheffer, J. Trotter, Pure Appl. Chem. 1997, 69,
815.
ment (from orthorhombic to monoclinic). Based on a very
limited number of examples, such changes appear to be the
rule rather than the exception when the products of single
crystal-to-single crystal reactions are recrystallized.[12]
In summary, the use of ionic chiral auxiliaries to preor-
ganize achiral organic molecules for asymmetric synthesis
through crystallization-induced immobilization in homochiral
conformations works well for the Yang photocyclization of 7-
methyl-7-benzoylnorbornane derivatives. Related studies
from our research group have shown the technique to give
high ee values in a wide variety of excited state processes,[1]
and it is clear that this approach represents one of the most
powerful methods of asymmetric synthesis available in the
field of organic photochemistry. Finally we point out that
optically pure photoproducts, such as those formed in the
present study, have potential as chiral synthons, and current
efforts in our laboratory are directed along these lines. In
addition, we are currently working toward extending the
solid-state ionic chiral-auxiliary method to ground state as
well as excited state processes.
[8] S. Beckmann, H. Geiger, Chem. Ber. 1961, 94, 48.
[9] There is now a large body of crystallographic evidence indicating
that g-hydrogen atom abstraction in the solid state occurs
preferentially over distances near the sum of the van der Waals
radii of oxygen and hydrogen (2.72 ). See H. Ihmels, J. R.
Scheffer, Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 885.
[10] 1,4-Hydroxybiradical ring closure involving retention of config-
uration at the hydroxyl-bearing carbon has been noted previ-
ously and appears to be a general feature of Yang photo-
cyclization reactions conducted in the crystalline state. See for
example A. D. Gudmundsdottir, T. J. Lewis, L. H. Randall, S. J.
Rettig, J. R. Scheffer, J. Trotter, C.-H. Wu, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 6167; M. Leibovitch, G. Olovsson, J. R. Scheffer, J.
Trotter, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12755.
[11] Interestingly, the diastereoselectivity of the solution phase
photoreaction is identical to that observed in the crystalline
state. One explanation of this result is that, even in solution,
rotation about the C7-carbonyl carbon bond in the initially
formed biradical is slow relative to closure owing to unfavorable
steric interactions developed between the aryl and methyl
groups. In addition, the biradical (a triplet) may be formed in
a conformation in which intersystem crossing to the singlet and
closure is faster than rotation. For examples in which geometry-
dependent intersystem crossing is thought to control the stereo-
chemistry of 1,4-biradical closure, see A. G. Griesbeck, H.
Heckroth, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 396, and references
therein.
Experimental Section
See the Supporting Information for the cell constants and related
crystallographic data as well as the details of the synthesis of keto-acid
1a, its conversion into an ionic chiral auxiliary-containing salt, the
photolysis of the salt in the crystalline state, the diazomethane
workup procedure and the characterization of cyclobutanol photo-
product 2b.
[12] See for example, V. Buchholz, V. Enkelmann, Mol. Cryst. Liq.
Cryst. 1998, 313, 309; K. Novak, V. Enkelmann, G. Wegner, K. B.
Wagnener, Angew. Chem. 1993, 105, 1678; Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1614. For a counter example, see K. Honda,
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2002, 75, 2383.
Received: April 8, 2003 [Z51609]
Keywords: asymmetric synthesis · crystal engineering ·
.
photochemistry · solid-state reactions · topochemistry
[1] J. R. Scheffer, Can. J. Chem. 2001, 79, 349.
[2] H. Rau, Chem. Rev. 1983, 83, 535; H. Buschmann, H. D. Scharf,
N. Hoffmann, P. Esser, Angew. Chem. 1991, 103, 480; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 477; Y. Inoue, Chem. Rev. 1992, 92,
741; J. P. Pete, Adv. Photochem. 1996, 21, 135; S. R. L. Everitt, Y.
Inoue in Molecular and Supramolecular Photochemistry, Vol. 3
(Eds.: V. Ramamurthy, K. S. Schanze), Marcell Dekker, New
York, 1999, chap. 2.
[3] J. Jacques, A. Collet, S. Wilen, Enantiomers, Racemates and
Resolutions, Wiley, New York, 1981, chap. 6.
[4] E. Vedejs, R. W. Chapman, S. Lin, M. Mꢀller, D. R. Powell, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3047; S. Caddick, K. Jenkins, Chem.
Soc. Rev. 1996, 25, 447.
[5] N. C. Yang, D. H. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 2913;
Review: P. Wagner, B.-S. Park in Organic Photochemistry,
Vol. 11 (Ed.: A. Padwa), Marcell Dekker, New York, 1991,
chap. 4.
[6] For a discussion of the different types of photochemical solid-to-
solid reactions (including single crystal-to-single crystal trans-
formations), see A. E. Keating, M. A. Garcia-Garibay in Molec-
ular and Supramolecular Photochemistry, Vol. 2 (Eds.: V.
Ramamurthy, K. S. Schanze), Marcell Dekker, New York,
1998, chap. 5. For a discussion of the dynamics of single
crystal-to-single crystal reactions, see G. Kaupp, Curr. Opin.
Solid State Mater. Sci. 2002, 6, 131.
[7] For a review on absolute configuration correlation studies in
solid state organic photochemistry, see M. Leibovitch, G.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3775 –3777
ꢀ 2003 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3777