and the other was submitted to microwave irradiation8
(conditions 3). For the two latter procedures, if both starting
materials were solids, a minimal amount of nonpolar solvent
(xylene) was added if necessary to ensure thorough contact
between the components. Also, identical quantities of
reagents and glassware were employed. In all cases, the
evolution of the reaction was monitored by thin-layer
chromatography (TLC) or gas chromatography (GC) to
follow the total consumption of starting aldehyde. All the
products were isolated by flash column chromatography on
silica gel after workup.
Scheme 1. Cycloadditions to Provide Pyrrolidines and
Pyrroles
Condensation of the O-allylic compounds 4a-e with ethyl
sarcosinate 6a proceeded to provide benzopyrano-pyrro-
lidines 7a-e in yields ranging from 70 to 98% (Scheme 3).
According to the choice of functionality, the procedure
would provide final products able to be employed as diversi-
fied scaffolds for the exploration of possible biological
activity.
Scheme 3. General Scheme for the Synthesis of Compounds
7a-da
Starting from salicylaldehyde, O-alkylation using allylic
or propargylic bromides proceeds in good to excellent yields.6
Varied starting materials were thus selected for the prepara-
tion of ω-unsaturated salicylaldehydes 4 and 5 containing
diverse substitution in order to investigate the effect of
functionality on the microwave-catalyzed reaction.
a Conditions: (1) toluene, reflux; (2) no solvent or minimal
xylene, heat in a preheated oil bath at 130 °C; (3) no solvent or
minimal xylene, microwave irradiation.
Scheme 2. O-Allyl and O-Propargylsalicylaldehydes
The results of the above condensations are provided in
Table 1. In the cases of compounds 7a,b,d, and e, the all-
cis6 compounds formed in the reaction were accompanied
by approximately 5% of a single diasteroisomer in which
the ring junction was trans. Compound 7c was obtained as
a 1:1 mixture of diastereoisomers in which the ring junction
was either cis or trans.6
Indeed, all the reactions performed under microwaves were
completed rapidly after a few minutes, except for 7d, which
was the exception. There is a clear advantage in using this
mode as compared to the thermal conditions. Also, the yields
under microwaves are often the highest, compared to those
under thermal conditions. This reflects a cleaner reaction with
fewer side-products, as observed on analysis of the crude
reaction mixtures, and thus easier purification. In both cases
of the activated O-allylic salicylaldehydes 4b and 4c, shorter
reaction times were observed, the ester-substituted compound
being much faster, as would be expected. Lower yields and
longer reaction times were observed under thermal conditions
for compound 7d, which contains a quaternary bridgehead
methyl moiety. Although longer than the other examples,
the reaction times were short and greatly improved yields
were achieved under microwaves. Interestingly, 5-chloro-
O-allylsalicylaldehyde 4e, which contains an unactivated
double bond, rapidly underwent condensation with ethyl
sarcosinate. Again, under microwave conditions, significant
acceleration of the reaction was observed.
The condensation of compounds 4 and 5 with R-amino
esters 6 was performed by three different protocols. In the
first instance (conditions 1) the reactions were performed in
round-bottom flasks using a Dean-Stark apparatus for the
removal of the 1 equiv water that is produced in the reaction,
thus calling for a minimum dilution of approximately 0.15
mol/L in the solvent (toluene).7 Two other procedures
were performed in test tubes surmounted with a condensing
tube, although this latter arrangement was not obligatory. In
these cases, one experiment was performed by heating the
mixture in a preheated oil bath at 130 °C (conditions 2),
(6) Broggini, G.; Zecchi, G. Synthesis 1996, 1280-1282.
(7) Confalone, P. N.; Huie, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 7175-
7178. Kanemasa, S.; Sakamoto, K.; Tsuge, O. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1989,
62, 1960-1968. Grigg, R.; Duffy, L. M.; Dorrity, M. J.; Malone, J. F.;
Rajviroongit, S.; Thornton-Pett, M. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 2213-2230.
Harwood, L. M.; Lilley, I. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 537-540.
(8) Reactions were carried out under atmospheric pressure on a CEM
Discover apparatus.
4916
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 25, 2003