recently demonstrated that secondary radicals bearing a
methyl substituent generated in this fashion can couple to
primary radicals with 5:1 retention of configuration at -196
°C.7 Earlier syntheses of 3-(trans-2-aminocyclopropyl)alanine
were reported by the groups of de Meijere15a and Armstrong16
using glycine enolate alkylation of the unstable iodide derived
from the alcohol 18. These routes rely on the generation of
C-2 chiral center of 3-(trans-2-aminocyclopropyl)alanine
either by use of a chiral glycine template15b or by chiral phase
transfer catalysis.16 In the present approach, the C-2 chiral
center is generated by incorporation of the existing stereo-
center of protected aspartic acid 1d (Scheme 4).
Scheme 5
arillus and seeds of unripe fruit of the Jamaican ackee tree
(Blighia sapida),19 hypoglycin A (23) is the causative agent
of Jamaican vomiting sickness.20 Natural hypoglycin A exists
as a mixture of diastereomers at C-4, with 17% diastereo-
meric excess favoring the (2S,4R) isomer.21
We followed the Wadsworth-Emmons cyclopropanation
protocol on benzyl (S)-(+)-glycidyl ether16 with a slight
change (final hydrogenolysis step is modified; 40 psi H2,
10% Pd-C, EtOAc, rt, 15 h, quant) in order to synthesize
requisite (S,S)-(trans-2-aminocyclopropyl)methanol deriva-
tive 18 (Scheme 4).
A recent synthesis of optically pure hypoglycin A21 relies
on the generation of C-2 chiral center by use of Scho¨llkopf
bis-lactim ether22 as chiral glycine template. As in case of
21, our approach for the synthesis of 26 is based on
generation of C-2 chiral center by incorporation of the
existing stereocenter of protected aspartic acid 1d (Scheme
5).
Thus, DCC-mediated coupling (-78 °C, 48 h) of 24,
obtained by modification of reported procedure23 (see the
Supporting Information), with 8 forms the diacyl peroxide
25 in 46% yield. Higher temperatures lower yields in this
reaction, probably due to peracid oxidation of the olefin and
subsequent decomposition. Photolysis of neat 25 at -78 °C
(30 h) produces 26 in 24% yield and with g95:5 diastere-
omeric ratio (by 1H NMR analysis in CDCl3 using Eu(Hfc)3,
as well as in DMSO-d6 at +100 °C, diastereomers insepa-
rable by silica gel chromatography).
Attempted oxidation of alcohol in 18 either by Jones
reagent or PDC could not generate the desired trans-â-
aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid derivative 19 in satisfac-
tory yield, possibly due to cyclopropane ring opening.17
18
However, oxidation of 18 with RuCl3/NaIO4 (MeCN/
CHCl3/H2O) cleanly produces 19 in 74% yield.
DCC-mediated coupling of 19 with 8 (R1 ) Cbz, R2 )
Me) forms the diacyl peroxide 20 in 83% yield.
Photolysis of neat 2013 at -78 °C (36 h) produces 21 in
47% yield and with g95:5 diastereomeric ratio (by 1H NMR
analysis in C6D6, diastereomers nonseparable by silica gel
chromatography), along with monodecarboxylation product
22 (41% yield). The retention of configuration at C-4 of 21
in the photolysis reaction is confirmed by NOE experiments.
In contrast to reaction at -78 °C, photolysis of neat 20 at
20 °C (4.5 h) in open atmosphere gives 18% yield of 21
along with 22 (29% yield). Photolysis of 20 at -196 °C is
sluggish (<20% conversion of 20 after 36 h).
Features of the photolytic decarboxylation-coupling reac-
tion that are critical for success are low temperature and
absence of solvent, as reported initially for simpler systems
by Scha¨fer and co-workers24 and extended by us to amino
acid derivatives.7 This reduces the mobility of the radical
We next examined the synthesis of protected (2S,4R)-
hypoglycin A (26, Scheme 5). Originally isolated from the
(13) All reactions were conducted with a 0.9 Amp UV lamp in 150 ×
75 mm crystallizing dish covered with a quartz plate and protected from
moisture. Reactions were performed on 0.07-0.93 mmol scale, but larger
scales are not problematic in our experience.
(14) Asai, A.; Hasegawa, A.; Ochiai, K.; Yamashita, Y.; Mizukami, T.
J. Antibiot. 2000 53, 81-83.
(15) (a) Brandl, M.; Kozhushkov, S. I.; Loscha, K.; Kokoreva, O. V.;
Yufit, D. S.; Howard, J. A. K.; de Meijere, A. Synlett 2000, 1741-1744.
(b) Larionov, O. V.; Savel’eva, T. F.; Kochetkov, K. A.; Ikonnokov, N. S.;
Kozhushkov, S. I.; Yufit, D. S.; Howard, J. A. K.; Khrustalev, V. N.;
Belokon, Y. N.; de Meijere, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 869-877.
(16) Armstrong, A.; Scutt, J. N. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2331-2334.
(17) Cannon, J. G.; Garst, J. E. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 182-184.
(18) (a) Carlsen, P. H. J.; Katsuki, T.; Martin, V. S.; Sharpless, K. B. J.
Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 3936-3938. (b) Godier-Marc, E.; Aitken, D. J.;
Husson, H.-P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 4065-4068.
(19) (a) Hassall, C. H.; Reyle, K. Biochem. J. 1955, 60, 334-339. (b)
Fowden, L.; Pratt, H. M. Phytochemistry 1973, 12, 1677-1681.
(20) (a) Tanaka, K. In Handbook of Clinical Neurology; Vinken, P. J.,
Bruyn. G. W., Eds.; North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1979; Vol. 37, pp 511-
539.
(21) Baldwin, J. E.; Adlington, R. M.; Bebbington, D.; Russell, A. T.
Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 12015-12028.
(22) Scho¨llkopf, U. Top. Curr. Chem. 1983, 109, 65-84.
(23) Lai, M.-t.; Liu, L.-d.; Liu, H.-w. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113,
7388-7397.
(24) Feldhues, M.; Scha¨fer, H. J. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 4213-4235.
(b) Feldhues, M.; Scha¨fer, H. J. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 1285-1290. (c)
Lomo¨lder, R.; Scha¨fer, H. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 1253-
1254.
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 24, 2003
4671