Organic Letters
Letter
differences in the wavenumber and the acidity of the phenol.15
Scheme 3. Scope of Different Diazoalkanes
To study the influence of the hydrogen-bond strength on the
reactivity of the O−H moiety, we subjected these phenols to
the blue-light-induced PPT reaction with a diazo compound.
First, we investigated the reaction of para-cyano phenol 10b
with methyl phenyldiazoacetate 6a, as they form a strong
hydrogen-bonding complex (11b, ΔEint = −9.51 kcal/mol,
Table 1). Gratifyingly, most common organic solvents were
compatible with this reaction, and the desired product was
obtained in moderate yields (Table 2, entries 1−6). The
Table 2. Optimization of Reaction Conditions
a
no.
solvent
ratio (6a/10b)
yield (%)
50
53
46
47
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1,2-DCE
DCM
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
2:1
1:2
1:2
1:2
1:2
1:2
CHCl3
toluene
n-hexane
EtOAc
MeOH
DCM
17
52
b
no product
76
c
DCM
80
75
61
c
1,2-DCE
EtOAc
DCM
c
d
no reaction
traces
e
DCM
a
Reaction conditions: 6a and 10b were dissolved in 1.0 mL of the
indicated solvent and irradiated with blue LEDs overnight at ambient
1
temperature (27 °C). Yields were calculated by H NMR spectros-
b
copy using mesitylene as an internal standard. Product of O−H
c
functionalization of MeOH from crude NMR. Isolated yield.
d
e
Reaction in the dark. Irradiation with a 23W CFL lamp overnight
at ambient temperature (27 °C).
highest reaction yield was obtained using DCM as the solvent.
In n-hexane, a heterogeneous reaction mixture was observed,
which resulted in a reduced reaction efficiency (17% yield).
When using MeOH as the solvent, only O−H functionaliza-
tion of methanol instead of para-cyano phenol was observed by
crude NMR of the reaction mixture (Table 2, entry 7). Next,
we investigated the reaction stoichiometry, and 2 equiv of
phenol was identified as being optimal for the reaction (Table
2, entry 9). The necessity for an excess of phenol can be
attributed to the rapid decomposition of diazo compounds
under blue-light irradiation conditions to form highly reactive
carbene or (in our case) carbocationic intermediates. Thus the
use of an excess of the reaction partner is often needed.11 No
reaction took place when the reaction was performed in the
dark, which underlines the necessity of photoirradiation for the
O−H functionalization reaction (Table 2, entry 12).
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we
investigated the reaction of different aryldiazoacetates in the
reaction with para-cyano phenol 11b (Scheme 3). To our
delight, different substituted esters were well tolerated under
the present reaction conditions, and the corresponding O−H
functionalization reaction products were isolated in high yields
(12a−e). Moreover, different electron-withdrawing and
electron-donating substituents on the aromatic ring and
polycyclic or heterocyclic aromatic systems are compatible
with the PPT reaction. The low yield of 12q can be explained
by the lower basicity of the pyridyl-substituted diazo
compound. On the contrary, electron-rich heterocyclic
systems, such as the 2-thienyl-substituted diazoacetate gave
significantly improved yields (12r). (1-diazo-2,2,2-
trifluoroethyl)benzene gave the O−H functionalization re-
action product 13 in 43% yield. When using ethyl diazoacetate
14 (EDA) under irradiation with UV light, only the
decomposition of the diazo compound was observed.
We subsequently studied a range of phenols with different
electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents under
the optimized reaction conditions (Scheme 4). On the basis of
our studies on the formation of the hydrogen-bonding
complex, we expected higher yields for electron-withdrawing
substituents as the acidity of the phenol increased. Indeed, this
was the case, as we observed higher yields for electron-
withdrawing groups compared with electron-donating groups
(e.g., para-nitro phenol vs para-chloro phenol: 85 vs 38% yield;
see Scheme 4). Moreover, the yield decreased when changing
from para- to meta- or ortho-substituted phenols, which is in
good correlation to previously observed trends in the
perturbation studies (Table 1). When investigating methyl 2-
C
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX