A R T I C L E S
Furuta and Fre´chet
In a preliminary report,11 we have demonstrated that some
degree of encapsulation of light emitting dyes within dendritic
shells might enable two dyes to coexist as a mixture while still
preserving some of their ability to emit individually as a result
of partial site-isolation. Following early work by Devadoss et
al.,9c with a single color emitter that was subject to self-
quenching caused by solid-state aggregation, Freeman et al.11
successfully utilized triarylamine (TAA) HT-labeled poly(benzyl
ether) dendrimers possessing Coumarin 343 (C343) and pen-
tathiophene (T5) core to give blue and green OLEDs, respec-
tively. Initial attempts to achieve synergistic emission from the
two types of dendrimers by blending them in a single layer were
only slightly successful due to detrimental energy transfer from
the C343 laser dye to the smaller band-gap T5. Due to the large
Fo¨rster radius of these dyes, energy transfer was an unfortuitous
consequence of the small size and flexibility of the surrounding
dendrons that were attached at a single point of the lumophores.
Attempts to synthesize larger, more highly shielding dendrimers
were unsuccessful due to the poor solubility and increased
crystallinity of the triarylamine dendrons beyond the second
generation. In general, such crystallinity is also highly detri-
mental to device performance due to the inhomogeneity of the
resulting solid films.
We now describe the use of a new synthetic protocol and
the design of novel building blocks that enable the preparation
of dual functionssite isolating and electroactivesdendrimers
with vastly improved solubilities and molecular dimensions that
may be adjusted readily to test more fully the fundamental
concept of site-isolation through simultaneous emission from
two vicinal dyes in a dendritic light emitting diode configuration.
Several recent reports have also described the use of dendrimers
as components of monochromatic light emitting diodes.12
In an accompanying manuscript the photoluminescence and
electroluminescence properties of the dendrimer-encapsulated
dyes and their mixtures are described.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of energy transfer between dyes (a)
and steric encapsulation preventing energy transfer between dyes (b)
electronic link was introduced between the periphery and the
core. In a dendritic antenna, an array of terminal donor
chromophores collects many photons and transfers their energy
through space (Fo¨rster energy transfer) to the core or focal point
acceptor unit, which can also be excited independently of the
periphery. Because emission is observed from the core only,
the system serves as a spatial and spectral energy concentrator,
in other words it acts as a “molecular lens”.
In contrast, it is normally difficult to prepare a light-emitting
layer in which two or more dyes emit simultaneously as energy
transfer between the dyes leads to light emission by the dye
with the lowest band gap10 as shown schematically in Figure
1a. Best results for simultaneous emission are generally obtained
by using highly diluted systems in which the dye molecules
are kept at mutual distances that exceed their Fo¨rster radius,
thereby reducing these nonluminescent interactions. The chal-
lenge posed by the creation of a single layer light emitting diode
capable of emitting two or more colors simultaneouslys
ultimately perhaps the three primary colors of the visible
spectrum to afford white lightsis an excellent vehicle to test a
dual function dendrimer design affording not only site-isolation
at its core but also contributing key electronic transport through
its periphery. The dendritic encapsulation shown schematically
in Figure 1b would enable multicolor emission from a single
layer containing a mixture of encapsulated dyes.
Results and Discussion
A. Design of the Light Emitting Dendrimers. To maximize
site-isolation, our dendrimer design features the light emitting
chromophore at the center of the dendrimer with a multi-
functional periphery held by large Fre´chet-type poly(aryl ether)
dendrons.3 With a two chromophore system involving for
example coumarin 343 (C343) and pentathiophene (T5) as the
central dyes, this arrangement keeps the core moieties separated
from each other to limit both self-quenching and the transfer
of energy from the dye with the higher band gap (C343) to the
lower band gap emitter (T5). The periphery of the dendrimers
is fitted with triarylamine (TAA) moieties that serve a charge
transport functionshole transport (HT)sfor the device and also
act as energy donors for the core acceptor chromophores. The
dendrimer generation can then be used to control the average
distance between the TAA units and the acceptor chromophores.
The hole transport moieties are expected to work in conjunction
with an oxadiazole (PBD) electron transporter added to the
(7) (a) Wang, P.-W.; Liu, Y.-J.; Devadoss, C.; Bharathi, P.; Moore, J. S. AdV.
Mater. 1996, 3, 237. (b) Shortreed, M. R.; Swallen, S. F.; Shi, Z.-Y.; Tan,
W.; Xu, Z.; Devadoss, C.; Moore, J. S.; Kopelman, R. J. Phys. Chem. B.
1997, 101, 6318. (c) Jiang, D.-L.; Aida, T. Nature 1997, 388, 454. (d)
Aida, T.; Jiang, D.-L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10 895. (e) Sato, T.;
Jiang, D.-L.; Aida, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10 658. (f) Balzani,
V.; Campagna, S.; Denti, G.; Juris, A.; Serroni, S.; Venturi, M. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1998, 31, 26. (g) Maruo, N.; Uchiyama, M.; Kato, T.; Arai, T.; Akisada,
H.; Nishino, N. Chem. Commun. 1999, 2057. (h) Plevoets, M.; Vo¨gtle, F.;
Cola, L. D.; Balzani, V. New J. Chem. 1999, 23, 63. (i) Schenning, P. H.
J.; Peeters, E.; Meijer, E. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4489. (j) Peng,
Z.; Pan, Y.; Xu, B.; Zhang, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6619. (k)
Weil, T.; Wiesler, U. M.; Herrmann, A.; Bauer, R.; Hofkens, J.; De
Schryver, F. C.; Mu¨llen, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8101
(8) Kawa, M. and Fre´chet, J. M. J. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10, 286.
(9) (a) Gilat, S. L.; Adronov, A.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999,
38, 1422. Adronov, A.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. Chem. Commun. 2000, 18, 1701.
(c) Devadoss, C.; Bharathi, P.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
9635. (d) Stewart, G. M.; Fox, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4354.
(10) Shoustikov, A.; You, Y.; Thompson, M. E. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum
1998, 4, 3.
(11) Freeman, A. W.; Koene, S. C.; Malenfant, P. R. L.; Thompson, M. E.;
Fre´chet, J. M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12 385.
(12) Representative publications include (a) Pogantsch, A.; Wenzl, F. P.; List,
E. J. W.; Leising, G.; Grimsdale, A. C.; Mu¨llen, K. AdV. Mater. 2002, 14,
1061. (b) Anthopoulos, T. D.; Markham, J. P. J.; Namdas, E. B.; Samuel,
I. D. W.; Lo, S.; Burn, P. L. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 4824. (c) Satoh,
N.; Cho, J.; Higuchi, M.; Yamamoto, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
8104.
9
13174 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 43, 2003