Paper
Green Chemistry
(151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.4, 136.3, 135.47, 133.0, 131.8, 129.0, Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 161.2, 138.0, 136.1,
128.5, 128.15, 128.10, 127.9, 126.6, 125.9, 100.2, 51.8.
132.6, 132.3, 128.1, 127.5, 126.07, 125.9, 125.5, 124.5, 123.5,
119.4, 119.1, 112.5, 111.6, 99.0, 40.4, 19.3.
Oxidation of 3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-1(2H)-one 8. To a 10 mL
Total synthesis of norketoyobyrine (9)
Aerobic oxidation of iminium salt 6. A 100 mL flask was flask was added a mixture of 8 and 9 (29 mg, ratio: 4 : 1,
charged with 2-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl)isoquinolin-2-ium 0.1 mmol) in i-PrOH (4 mL). The flask was placed in an oil-
iodide 6 (800 mg, 2 mmol), cesium carbonate (977 mg, bath at 50 °C and stirred until the solid was completely dis-
3.0 mmol) and UHP (282 mg, 3.0 mmol), and cooled in an ice- solved. Then CeCl3·7H2O (0.01 mmol, 4 mg) was added. The
bath. Then DMSO (7.5 mL) and DMF (7.5 mL) were added with reaction mixture was stirred until 8 was consumed as indicated
stirring. The reaction mixture was continuously stirred in an by TLC (ca. 2.5 h). It was cooled to RT, neutralized to pH 8–9
ice-bath until 6 was consumed as indicated by TLC (ca. 36 h). with saturated NaHCO3, and completely extracted with EtOAc
It was diluted with ethyl acetate (15 mL) and water (15 mL) (8 × 3 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with
and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 15 mL). The combined organic saturated brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and
phase was washed with water and saturated brine, dried over concentrated under reduced pressure to afford the crude
anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced product, which was purified by silica gel chromatography (PE/
pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromato- CH2Cl2 = 1 : 5) to give norketoyobyrine 9 as a yellow solid
graphy on silica gel (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 2 : 1) to (23 mg, 80%).9a 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.70 (s, 1H),
provide 2-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl) isoquinolin-1(2H)-one 7 as a 8.24 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.75–7.67 (m, 1H), 7.62 (d, J = 7.9 Hz,
1
yellow solid (519 mg, 90% yield), m. p. 120–130 °C. H NMR 1H), 7.59 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 0H), 7.43 (d, J =
(600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.49 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.04 (s, 1H), 7.70 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.11–7.03 (m, 2H), 4.40 (t,
(d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.09 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz,
1H), 7.47 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.43–7.33 (m, 1H), 7.21 (t, J = DMSO-d6) δ 161.7, 138.5, 136.6, 133.1, 132.8, 128.6, 128.0,
7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.14 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (s, 1H), 6.78 (d, J = 126.6, 126.4, 126.0, 125.0, 124.0, 120.0, 119.6, 113.0, 112.1,
7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.32 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 4.30 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 99.5, 40.9, 19.8.
3.42–3.14 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.1, 137.2,
136.4, 132.1, 132.0, 127.8, 127.3, 126.6, 126.3, 125.8, 122.5,
122.2, 119.6, 118.7, 112.4, 111.2, 105.4, 50.3, 25.0. HRMS
Conflicts of interest
(ESI-TOF) calcd for C19H16N2NaO [M + Na]+: 311.1155; found
311.1153.
There are no conflicts to declare.
Cyclization of isoquinolone 7. A 10 mL screwtop pressure
Schlenk tube was charged with a solution of 2-(2-(1H-indol-3-
yl) ethyl)isoquinolin-1(2H)-one 7 (29 mg, 0.1 mmol) in CH3CN
(2 mL). BF3·Et2O (43 μL, 0.35 mmol) was added with stirring.
Acknowledgements
The tube was sealed with a screw stopper and stirred for 48 h The authors thank the financial support from the NSFC of
at 85 °C. After cooling it to RT, the mixture was diluted with di- China (20971105), the Natural Science Foundation of
chloromethane (5 mL) and water (5 mL) and extracted with di- Chongqing (cstc2017jcyjAX0423), and the Fundamental
chloromethane (3 × 5 mL). The combined organic phase was Research Funds for the Central Universities (XDJK2019AA003).
dried over anhydrous CaCl2, and concentrated under reduced
pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromato-
graphy on silica gel (PE/DCM = 1 : 10) to provide 24 mg of a
Notes and references
yellow solid. The 1H NMR spectrum indicated that it consisted
of dihydronorketoyobyrine 8 and norketoyobyrine 9 in a ratio
of 4 to 1. Thus, the total yield of the two compounds was 85%.
Dihydronorketoyobyrine 8 (major).20a 1H NMR (400 MHz,
DMSO-d6) δ 11.11 (s, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (d, J =
6.9 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H),
7.40–7.33 (m, 2H), 7.13–7.06 (m, 1H), 7.02 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H),
5.15–4.94 (m, 2H), 3.60 (dd, J = 15.8, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 2.96 (dd, J =
12.4, 3.1 Hz, 2H), 2.89 (d, J = 11.7 Hz, 1H), 2.82–2.69 (m, 1H).
13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.3, 137.4, 136.9, 134.19,
132.49, 129.3, 128.4, 127.7, 127.6, 126.7, 121.7, 119.2, 118.4,
1 K. Fang, G. Li and Y. She, J. Org. Chem., 2018, 83, 8092.
2 W. T. Borden, R. Hoffmann, T. Stuyver and B. Chen, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 9010.
3 Y. Nosaka and A. Y. Nosaka, Chem. Rev., 2017, 117, 11302.
4 Y. Li, S. A. Rizvi, D. Hu, D. Sun, A. Gao, Y. Zhou, J. Li and
X. Jiang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 13499.
5 W. Fan and P. Li, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 12201.
6 M. Liu, H. Wang, H. Zeng and C.-J. Li, Sci. Adv., 2015, 1,
e1500020.
7 A. Studer and D. P. Curran, Nat. Chem., 2014, 6, 765.
8 For selected examples, see: (a) W. E. Doering, G. Cortes and
L. H. Knox, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1947, 69, 1700;
(b) W. E. Doering and R. W. Haines, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1954, 76, 482; (c) G. E. Lewis, J. Org. Chem., 1965, 30, 2433;
(d) T. Siu, D. Qin and S. J. Danishefsky, Angew. Chem., Int.
111.6, 107.8, 52.2, 39.6, 34.8, 21.1. Norketoyobyrine
9
(minor).9a 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.71 (s, 1H), 8.25
(d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (d, J = 5.6 Hz,
1H), 7.58 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (br.s, 2H), 7.22 (t, J = 7.6 Hz,
1H), 7.12–7.06 (m, 2H), 4.41 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 3.10 (t, J = 6.6
Green Chem.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019