Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
were analyzed on the LC-MS on the positive ion mode at the same
time. Time points were recorded every 1.5−1.6 min (from the
timestamps of the data files), which accounts for the duration of data
collection as well as sample injection performed by the instrument.
In-Vitro LC-MS End-Point Analysis with C18 and Chiral
Chromatography. For assays involving PhDIR apoplastic plant
extract, the protocols by Gasper et al. were followed with
modifications.25 Enzyme assays were prepared by diluting the plant
extract of leaves expressing either PhDIR or EV (transformed with
agrobacteria at OD600 nm = 0.1) 5-fold in 0.1 M MES buffer containing
0.3 M NaCl and 0.333 mU/μL TvLac at pH 5.5. Substrate stock
solutions were prepared from 100 mM solutions in DMSO for 1 and
8-11 and in MeOH for 1 and 3-7. (In our hands, use of methanol
stock solutions resulted in increased production of coupling products
derived from 3-7 (CA-X and X-X) in comparison to that when
DMSO stock solutions were used.) Reactions were initiated by
addition of 1.875 mM equimolar substrate solutions in 1.875%
DMSO or MeOH for a final total substrate concentration of 1 mM at
30 °C. After 20 min for assays containing 4 and 40 min for the rest,
the coupling reactions were quenched by addition of an equal volume
of acetonitrile. The reactions were centrifuged at 15000 rpm for 10
min, and the supernatants were filtered for LC-MS anaylsis on the
positive ion mode.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
■
Transient Expression of P. hexandrum Genes by Agro-
Infiltration. Agrobacterium tumafaciens (GV3101, gentamicinR;
agrobacteria or agro) transformants with P. hexandrum genes in
pEAQ-HT (kanamycinR) vectors were prepared as described
previously.17 Agrobacteria (gentR and kanR) grown on LB plates
supplemented with gentamicin and kanamycin were resuspended in
LB media and centrifuged at 8000 x g for 5 min. Supernatant was
discarded, and the cell pellets were resuspended in 500 μL of 10 mM
MES buffer at pH 5.6 with 10 mM MgCl2 and 150 μM
acetosyringone for 1−2 h induction at room temperature. The
induced cell suspension was further diluted with induction media to
the desired inoculum level measured by optical density measurement
at 600 nm. The agrobacterial suspension was infiltrated on the
underside of the N. benthamiana leaves with a needleless 1-ml syringe.
Plants were 5−6 weeks old at the time of infiltration, grown under a
16-h light cycle. Biological replicates consisted of leaves from different
N. benthamiana plants from the same batch, unless otherwise noted.
Apoplastic Fluid Wash Protocol (APW). Plant extracts were
obtained from N. benthamiana leaves by APW as described
previously.25,48 Briefly, PhDIR-harboring or empty pEAQ-HT vector
was transiently expressed in N. benthamiana by agro-infiltration
(OD600 nm = 0.1−0.3) for 5 days. Leaves were vacuum-infiltrated with
0.1 M MES and 0.3 M NaCl at pH 5.5 through three cycles of pulling
vacuum to 150 Torr and slow release to atmospheric pressure. The
infiltrated leaves were layered on top of a piece of parafilm and
wrapped around a pipet tip and placed inside a syringe in place of a
plunger. The syringe assembly was placed in a conical tube and was
centrifuged at 1500 x g for 15 min at 4 °C. The extracts collected at
the bottom of the conical tubes were transferred to clean tubes and
centrifuged at 14000 x g for 10 min at 4 °C to clear undesired cellular
debris. The supernatants were ultrafiltrated (Amicon Ultra-0.5 mL 10-
kD) at 14000 x g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the retentate was aliquoted,
flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until use at 5-fold
dilution.
Time-Course of TvLac Oxidation on LC-MS. Enzyme assays
contained a final concentration of 1 mM equimolar mixture (1%
MeOH in water) and 0.1 mU/μL TvLac in 1.5 mM MES buffer at pH
5.5. When TvLac was substituted with HRP or APS (Figure 4a), 5 pg/
μL HRP and 10 mM H2O2, or 1 mM APS was used. When the molar
ratio of the mixed substrates was varied (Figure 4b−d, S14 and S15),
the amount of the limiting monomer (often 1) was kept constant at
500 μM with the final total substrate concentration ranging 0.5−5
mM. (E.g., for a molar ratio of 1:3, the final concentrations of the
limiting and excess monomers were 500 μM and 1.5 mM,
respectively, with the final total substrate concentration of 2 mM.)
For the varied pH study (Figure S13), citrate buffer was used for pH 2
and 4, HEPES buffer at pH 7, and Tris buffer at pH 8.5. (Because
there is no chromatography in this analysis, to minimize salt
contamination in the mass spectrometer, it was important to use
organic buffer reagents and ammonium hydroxide or sulfuric acid for
adjusting pH.) For standards (Figure S17), bovine serum albumin was
supplemented instead of TvLac at 152 ng/μL. Reactions were
initiated by addition of 2 mM substrate stock solutions (equi-volume
dilution to a final concentration of 1 mM). Substrates were added to
the reaction at ∼1 min prior to the first injection of each sample. Real-
time reaction samples were analyzed on the LC-MS on the positive
ion mode through direct injection. Three samples were analyzed
within the same worklist at a time, and reaction replicates were
randomized over different worklists. Time points were recorded every
1.5−1.6 min, which accounts for the time of data collection as well as
sample injection performed by the instrument.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at
■
sı
General methods and materials, synthetic procedures,
supplementary figures, supplementary table, NMR
spectra, and supplementary references (PDF)
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
■
Elizabeth S. Sattely − Department of Chemical Engineering
and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University,
Stanford, California 94305, United States; orcid.org/
Author
Stacie S. Kim − Department of Chemical Engineering,
Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United
Complete contact information is available at:
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
We would like to thank Warren Lau for help and guidance in
the initial development of this project; Mark Smith (Medicinal
Chemistry Knowledge Center, ChEM-H) for help with
designing medicinally relevant monolignol analogues; Russ Li
for preparation of p-coumaryl alcohol; Curt Fischer and Yuqin
Dai (Metabolomics Knowledge Center, ChEM-H) for helpful
discussions and 6545 qToF usage; Stephen Lynch (Stanford
NMR facility director) for consultation on NMR techniques;
Kevin Smith for help with NMR analysis; Alex Engel for critical
reading of the manuscript; and Kevin Smith, Ryan Nett,
Time-Course of In Vitro TvLac-EV vs TvLac-PhDIR Assays on
LC-MS. Enzyme assays contained a final concentration of 1 mM
equimolar substrate mixture, 1% MeOH, 0.333 mU/μL TvLac, and
20% v/v PhDIR or EV plant extract (transformed with agrobacteria at
OD600 nm = 0.3) in 20 mM MES buffer at pH 5.5. Reactions were
initiated by addition of substrate stock solutions at 1.875 mM
(1.875% DMSO in water). Substrates were added to the reaction at 1
min prior to the first injection of each sample. Reaction replicates
Ricardo De La Pena, and Bailey Schultz for helpful discussions
̃
and feedback. This work was supported by the National
Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under
Grant No. DGE-1656518, NIH R01GM121527, and a AAAS
5019
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 5011−5021