Table 7 Biodegradation data obtained for amide CILs 2c vs. SDS
reference
PHD-ET-7). The antibacterial and antifungal screening was sup-
ported by the Czech Science Foundation (project No. P207/10/
2048) (MS). Biodegradation studies supported by financial
support of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
(project CTQ2010-17990) (MTG).
% Biodegradation
Compound
7 d
14 d
21 d
28 d
95% aCI
SDS
2c
78
16
89
59
91
61
94
61
89–99
55–66
IL initial concentration = 20 mg C L−1
calculated from 4 replicates.
,
a confidence limits were
References
1 R. D. Rogers and K. R. Seddon, Ionic Liquids; Industrial Applications to
Green Chemistry, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 2002,
pp. 1–492.
2 Ionic Liquids in Synthesis, ed. P. Wasserschid and T. Welton Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 2003, pp. 1–380.
3 P. Wasserscheid, R. Van Hal and A. Bösmann, Green Chem., 2002, 4,
400–404.
4 J. Pernak, I. Goc and I. Mirska, Green Chem., 2004, 6, 323–329.
5 M. Rebros, H. Q. Nimal Gunaratne, J. Ferguson, K. R. Seddon and
G. Stephens, Green Chem., 2009, 11, 402–408.
Table 8 Biodegradation data obtained for amide CILs 18c vs. SDS
reference
% Biodegradation
Compound
6 d
13 d
20 d
28 d
95% aCI
6 D. Zhao, Y. Liao and Z. Zhang, Clean: Soil, Air, Water, 2007, 35, 42–48.
7 N. Gathergood and P. J. Scammells, Aust. J. Chem., 2002, 55, 557–560.
8 N. Gathergood, M. T. Garcia and P. J. Scammells, Green Chem., 2004, 6,
166–175.
9 N. Gathergood, M. T. Garcia and P. J. Scammells, Green Chem., 2006, 8,
156–160.
SDS
18c
67
42
91
65
91
68
81
64
76–88
59–68
IL initial concentration = 20 mg C L−1
calculated from 4 replicates.
,
a confidence limits were
10 S. Stolte, S. Abdulkarim, J. Arning, A. Blomeyer-Nienstedt, U. Bottin-
Weber, M. Matzke, J. Ranke, B. Jastorff and J. Thoeming, Green Chem.,
2008, 10, 214–224.
11 D. Coleman and N. Gathergood, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 600–637.
12 J. Pernak, K. Sobaszkiewicz and I. Mirska, Green Chem., 2003, 5, 52–
56.
13 J. Pernak, I. Goc and I. Mirska, Green Chem., 2004, 6, 323–329.
14 L. Carson, P. K. W. Chau, M. J. Earle, M. A. Gilea, B. F. Gilmore, S.
P. Gorman, M. T. McCann and K. R. Seddon, Green Chem., 2009, 11,
492–497.
15 A. Busetti, D. E. Crawford, M. E. Earle, M. A. Gilea, B. F. Gilmore, S.
P. Gorman, G. Laverty, A. F. Lowry, M. McLaughlin and K. R. Seddon,
Green Chem., 2010, 12, 420–425.
16 W. L. Hough, M. Smiglak, H. Rodriguez, R. P. Swatloski, S. K. Spear, D.
T. Daly, J. Pernak, J. E. Grisel, R. D. Carliss, M. D. Soutullo, J. H. Davis
and R. D. Rogers, New J. Chem., 2007, 31, 1429.
17 P. M. Dean, J. Turanjanin, M. Yoshizawa-Fujita, D. R. Mac Farlane and J.
L. Scott, Cryst. Growth Des., 2009, 9, 1137–1145.
18 S. Y. Choi, H. Rodriguez, A. Mirjafari, D. F. Gilpin, S. McGrath, K.
R. Malcolm, M. M. M. Tummey, R. D. Rogers and T. Mc Nally, Green
Chem., 2011, 13, 1527–1535.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 9027), with selectivity for
MRSA inhibition established. 18c, 19c and 20c also demon-
strated antibacterial behaviour against the test species. A relation-
ship between these CIL structures and their resulting
bioactivities (SAR) has been highlighted. The presence of the
lipophilic, aromatic phenylalanine unit in the ILs (17c–20c)
dipeptidyl side chain results in active antibacterials. However,
20c, with the Phe-Phe sequence was less active, with no MRSA
selectivity (cf. 17c). The relationship between antimicrobial tox-
icity and ecotoxicity (including biodegradation studies) is
complex. Antimicrobial toxicity determines toxicity to a single
strain, while an ecotoxicity test determines toxicity to a commu-
nity of organisms. We postulate that an MRSA selective antibac-
terial ionic liquid (17c) will be less toxic in an ecotoxicity test
than a proven antimicrobial biocide (22). Biodegradation studies
of 2c and 18c show that these two ionic liquids ‘pass’ the ‘CO2
Headspace Test’ and are ‘readily biodegradable’. As low toxicity
in an ecotoxicity (e.g. biodegradation) test, does not ensure bio-
degradation, persistence of recalcitrant parent compounds or
breakdown products must also be considered. Studies are on-
going to establish the biodegradation properties of the class of
ionic liquids disclosed herein. Our overall aim is to develop
MRSA selective drugs which are readily biodegradable and
avoid bioaccumulation in the environment. Our combined med-
icinal and green chemistry research strategy was successful in
discovering an antimicrobial ‘hit’. Further work is required to
determine the ‘lead’ compound and to define the
pharmacophore.
19 N. Nodor, J. Med. Chem., 1980, 23, 566–569.
20 T. Thorsteinsson, M. Másson, K. G. Kristinsson, M. A. Hjálmarsdóttir,
H. Hilmarsson and T. Loftsson, J. Med. Chem., 2003, 46, 4173–4181.
21 K. M. Docherty, J. K. Dixon and C. F. Kulpa, Biodegradation, 2007, 18,
481–493.
22 S. Morrissey, B. Pegot, D. Coleman, M. T. Garcia, D. Ferguson,
B. Quilty and N. Gathergood, Green Chem., 2009, 11, 475–483.
23 Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that
Grow Aerobically. Approved Standard – Seventh Edition. Document
M07-A7. Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute, Wayne, PA, 2006.
24 Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of
Yeasts. Approved standard. Document M27-A3. Clinical Laboratory
Standard Institute, Wayne, PA, 2008.
25 Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of
Filamentous Fungi. Approved standard. Document M38-A2. Clinical
Laboratory Standard Institute, Wayne, PA, 2008.
26 ISO 14593: Water quality, Evaluation of ultimate aerobic biodegradability
of organic compounds in aqueous medium. Method by analysis of
inorganic carbon in sealed vessels CO2, headspace test.
27 For previous work by M. Teresa Garcia using the ISO 14593 test, see ref.
8, 9, 11, 22.
Acknowledgements
The authors (NG, DC) would like to thank the Environmental
Protection Agency in Ireland for funding (EPA 2006-
28 OECD, Ready Biodegradability-CO2 in Sealed Vessels (Headspace Test
and Closed Bottle Test), in Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, 310, 2006.
1356 | Green Chem., 2012, 14, 1350–1356
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012