triethylamine (TEA) as a lightweight and more economical
alternative base. With 1.5 equiv of TEA, >99% de was
obtained with 5 mol % of Wilkinson’s catalyst at 60 psi
hydrogen pressure in ethanol/THF (9:1) (entry 3). Better than
90% de could be achieved even with 1 mol % of the catalyst
under these conditions (entry 4). With the free acid, only
88% de was observed in the ethanol/THF system (entry 5).
This result is not surprising, since the COOH group must
undergo dissociation to generate the COO- before it can
bind to the rhodium catalyst. This hypothesis is further
supported by the following observation: when the corre-
sponding methyl ester of 1 was subjected to hydrogenation
under these conditions (with no base present), no de was
observed. Obviously, the ester group is not capable of any
significant coordination to the transition metal in this case,
and therefore the hydrogenation was nonselective. The
ethanol/THF ratio has a very noticeable effect on the reaction
rates, and the optimized ethanol/THF ratio is 9:1 (v/v). When
pure THF was used, the hydrogenation proceeded very
slowly although with similarly high diastereoselectivity (entry
6). Addition of ethanol dramatically increased the reaction
rate. This observation can be easily explained by the high
solubility of hydrogen in ethanol.13 Yet, THF is still needed
in our system because it appears to offer better solubility
for the catalyst and substrates, thus permitting the reaction
to proceed at high concentrations. It is significant that these
optimized conditions also permit the hydrogenation to
proceed smoothly at a much lower hydrogen pressure (entries
7 and 8). The simplicity of the procedure has enabled us to
conduct the hydrogenation on greater than 100-g scale.
For comparison, we also examined the heterogeneous
hydrogenation of 1. It proceeded smoothly in ethanol
(Pearlman’s catalyst, ammonium formate as the hydrogen
source) to afford a mixture of diastereomers 1a and 1b in a
ratio of 1:2. The hydrogenation of the methyl ester of 1 also
showed similar stereoselectivity (1:3).
We also examined the homogeneous hydrogenation of the
substrates 2 and 3 using our optimized conditions. Under
these conditions, both substrates afforded the desired hy-
drogenation products (2a and 3a, respectively) with better
than 99% de.14
In summary, we have found that carboxylate group is a
very effective directing group for directed homogeneous
hydrogenation with Wilkinson’s catalyst. Under our reaction
conditions, indene and 3,4-dihydronaphthalene acids are
hydrogenated smoothly via their amine carboxylates in a
highly stereoselective manner. The ease of handling and
relatively low cost of the catalyst make this methodology a
very practical one. Furthermore, since carboxyl group is
readily interconvertable with a variety of functional groups
such as esters, amides, hydroxyl, etc., this methodology thus
constitutes a very practical alternative to the cationic catalyst-
based directed stereoselective hydrogenation.5
(11) Column, Chiracel AD, 4.6 (i.d.) × 250 mm; mobile phase A, 0.1%
TFA (trifluoroacetic acid) in hexanes, mobile phase B, 0.1% TFA in IPA
(isopropyl alcohol); method, isocratic 95% A (5%B), 20 min; flow rate,
1.5 mL/min; detector (UV), 284 nm. Retention times for the four
diastereomers are 5.163 (SR), 6.255 (RS), 10.262 (RR), and 14.399 min
(SS); the first letter denotes the absolute configuration of the carbon adjacent
to the carboxyl group. The stereochemistry assignment for each peak is
described as the following: a nonequal racemic diastereomeric mixture was
analyzed by chiral HPLC to obtain 4 baseline-resolved peaks. Peaks 3 and
4, 1 and 2 are enantiomer pairs based on UV integration. The absolute
configuration of peak 4 is determined to be SS by X-ray structural analysis.
Peak 3 can then be assigned a RR configuration with certainty. The absolute
configurations of peaks 1 and 2 were determined by another experiment.
Optically active (S)-indene acid (96% ee) from the chemical resolution was
subjected to diastereoselective hydrogenation. The indane acid obtained was
then analyzed by chiral HPLC. Due to high diastereoselectivity of the
hydrogenation (>99% de), only the (SR)-diastereomer peak should be
detectable by HPLC (retention time 5.363 min, ca. 0.97% area) in addition
to the desired SS diastereomer (major) and its enantiomer RR. The 2nd
peak from the 1st experiment (6.255 min) can then be assigned an RS
configuration with certainty.
Acknowledgment. The authors thank Jordi Benet-Buch-
holz for X-ray analysis, Laszlo Musza and Jeff Chin for
assistance in NMR spectrum analysis, and Timothy He and
Anthony Paiva for HRMS. We are indebted to Dr. Donald
Wolanin for proof reading this manuscript.
Supporting Information Available: Complete experi-
mental details and X-ray crystal structure (ORTEP repre-
sentation) of the (R)-R-methyl benzylanine salt of (SS)-1a.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
(12) The racemate of the indene substrate (1) can be resolved chemically
with quinine prior to the stereoselective hydrogenation. The resolution
yielded the (S)-enantiomer as the less soluble diastereomeric salt in
acetonitrile (34%yield, 96-97% ee). The free acid was liberated by
dissolving the salt in 2 N aqueous HCl followed by extraction into methylene
chloride. The (SS)-enantiomer of 1a was then readily obtained in high ee
after hydrogenation.
OL034464O
(14) The stereochemistry assignments of 2a and 3a are based on analogy
to that of 1a and are consistent with nOe and coupling constants data. The
de measurements are based on 1H NMR integration. In both cases, the minor
diastereomer was not detected.
(13) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; Weast, R., Ed.; The
Chemical Rubber Co.: Cleveland, OH, 1969; p B-114.
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 9, 2003
1589