C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Evaluation of Relay Templates
ent
R
R
1
no.
yielda
exo/endob
exo (ee)c
Figure 1. Stereochemical model.
1
2
3
4d
5
6
7
CH3
phenyl
1-naphthyl
1-naphthyl
phenyl
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
cyclohexyl
benzyl
5b
5a
5c
5c
5d
5e
5f
96
96
93
94
93
94
97
92/8
78
75
86
91
79
93
85
90/10
89/11
87/13
95/5
91/9
90/10
gave high diastereo- and enantioselectivity (entry 6). Both electron-
deficient (6c) and electron-rich (6d) nitrones gave addition products
in modest yields, although enantioselectivity remained high in both
cases (entries 7 and 8). Reaction with N-phenyl substituted nitrone
6e was very efficient and highly enantioselective, but the exo/endo
selectivity was low (entry 9).
Our results suggest that the key to exo selectivity is the use of
a Lewis acid that forms square planar complexes (Figure 1 for
substrate 5c, nitrone 6a, and ligand 9, and copper triflate).11 The
exo attack is not sterically encumbered in this complex. As was
demonstrated in our previous work,5a the pyrazolidinone relay
template in a square planar arrangement works in concert with the
ligand to amplify enantioselectivity.
phenyl
1-naphthyl
cyclohexyl
a Isolated yield. b Diastereomer ratio determined by 1H NMR (400 or
500 MHz). c Determined by chiral HPLC. d Reaction at 3 °C.
Table 3. Reactions with Various Dipolarophiles and Nitrones
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by NSF-CHE-
0316203 and NSF-EPS-0132289.
yielda
(SM)
exo/
endob
ee exo
(endo)c
ent
subs. (R)
R
1
R
2
Supporting Information Available: Characterization data for
compounds 5-12 and experimental procedures (PDF). This material
1
2
3
H 5g
CH3 5a
Et 5h
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
Bn
Bn
Bn
Ph
Ph 6a
85
94
66/34
96/4
94/6
84/16
67/33
93/7
85/15
95/5
99 (12)
98
99
75
85 (45)
99
98
98
99 (90)
Ph 6a
Ph 6a
Ph 6a
Ph 6a
Ph 6b
4-ClPh 6c
4-MeOPh 6d
Ph 6e
88 (10)
23 (76)
44 (37)
92
52 (41)
45
4d,e
5f
6
Ph 5i
CO2Et 5j
CH3 5a
CH3 5a
CH3 5a
CH3 5a
References
(1) (a) Karlssson, S.; Hogberg, H.-E. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2001, 33, 103.
(b) Gothelf, K. V.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem. Commun. 2000, 1449. (c)
Kanemasa, S. Synlett 2002, 1371. (d) Confalone, P. N.; Huie, E. M. Org.
React. 1988, 1.
7
8g
9
85 (13)
52/48
(2) (a) Kanemasa, S.; Oderaotoshi, Y.; Tanaka, J.; Wada, E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 12355. (b) Karlsson, S.; Hogberg, H.-E. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2002, 13, 923. (c) Jen, W. S.; Wiener, J. J. M.; MacMillan,
D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9874. (d) Kobayashi, S.;
Kawamura, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5840. (e) Iwasa, S.;
Tsushima, S.; Shimada, T.; Nishiyama, H. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 227.
(f) Desimoni, G.; Faita, G.; Mortoni, A.; Righetti, P. Tetrahedron Lett.
1999, 40, 2001.
a Isolated yield. b Diastereomer ratio determined by 1H NMR (400 or
500 MHz). c Determined by chiral HPLC. d Ligand 9 was used in place of
12. e MS 4 A was added. f 50 mol % catalyst was used. g O2 balloon was
used.
entries 2, 5, and 6). On the other hand, when both N1- and C5-
substituents are large, the exo adduct enantioselectivity does not
change (compare entry 3 with 7). These results suggest that there
is a fine balance between the N1 and C5 substituents in providing
optimal levels of selectivity. When the pyrazolidinone ring was
replaced by a simple oxazolidinone, the reaction proceeded in high
yield (98%) and exo selectivity (98:2), but with modest enantiose-
lectivity (40% ee). This result suggests that the chiral relay templates
amplify enantioselectivity but are not the source of exo selectivity.
We have carried out a small breadth and scope study by varying
the enoyl substrate (entries 1-5) as well as the nitrone (entries
6-10), and these results are tabulated in Table 3 (eq 3). We chose
ligand 12 which had provided high selectivity in Table 1. The parent
acrylate 5g gave the exo isomer in good yield and selectivity (entry
1). As illustrated earlier, the crotonate (5a) gave high selectivity
(entry 2). The â-ethyl (5h) and cinnamate (5i) substrates were less
reactive, but the ee’s for the major exo adducts were high (entries
3 and 4). The fumarate (5j) was less efficient and somewhat less
selective (entry 5). In terms of nitrone structure, compound 6a was
very reactive and also gave the highest exo:endo selectivity (entry
2). A benzyl group on the nitrogen as in 6b was well tolerated and
(3) For a discussion, see: Gothelf, K. V.; Hazell, R. G.; Jørgensen, K. A. J.
Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 346.
(4) For reactions proceeding with good exo diastereoselectivity or enanti-
oselectivity, see: (a) Jensen, K. B.; Gothelf, K. V.; Hazell, R. G.;
Jørgensen, K. A. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 2471. (b) Gothelf, K. V.;
Jørgensen, K. A. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 5687. (c) Crosignani, S.;
Desimoni, G.; Fiata, G.; Filippone, S.; Mortoni, A.; Righeti, P. P.; Zema,
M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7007. (d) Hori, K.; Kodama, H.; Ohta,
T.; Furukawa, I. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5017. (e) Gothelf, K. V.; Hazell,
R. G.; Jørgensen, K. A. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 5483.
(5) Achiral templates with fluxional groups in synthesis, see: (a) Sibi, M.
P.; Venkatraman, L.; Liu, M.; Jasperse, C. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 8444. (b) Corminboeuf, O.; Quaranta, L.; Renaud, P.; Liu, M.;
Jasperse, C. P.; Sibi, M. P. Chem.-Eur. J. 2003, 9, 28. (c) Sibi, M. P.;
Liu, M. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 4181.
(6) See Supporting Information for details on the synthesis of the starting
materials, nitrones, stereochemistry analysis, and experimental conditions.
(7) The identities of the exo and endo adducts were established by converting
them to known compounds. See Supporting Information for details.
(8) Johnson, J. S.; Evans, D. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 35, 325.
(9) (a) References 2a, 4a, and 4c. (b) Kawamura, M.; Kobayashi, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3213.
(10) These results suggest that there may be competing pathways when MS
are added. The high enantioselectivity for the exo adduct with or without
MS suggests that it may be formed without the involvement of the sieves.
(11) This conclusion is consistent with the high exo selectivity with copper as
a Lewis acid (square planar complex) rather than magnesium or iron Lewis
acids (typically tetrahedral or octahedral geometry).
JA039087P
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 3, 2004 719