C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 2
regioselectivity can also be affected by the electrochemical
characteristics of the reaction center. Even though the competence
of the difluoromethylene group as a carbonyl equivalent is poor,
the alternative outcome in regioselectivity of hydride reduction may
find application in enzyme catalysis.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported in part by National
Institutes of Health Grants GM35906 and GM54346. C.L. thanks
the Singer-Polignac Foundation (France) for a Postdoctoral Fellow-
ship. We would also like to thank the reviewers of this paper for
their valuable comments on the mechanisms shown in Scheme 2.
Supporting Information Available: Scheme and synthesis (PDF).
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
(1) Dolphin, D., Poulson, R., Avramovic, O., Eds. Pyridine Nucleotide
Coenzymes, Chemical, Biochemical, and Medical Aspects; Wiley-Inter-
science: New York, 1987; Parts A and B.
(2) Re´tey, J.; Robinson, J. A. Stereospecificity in Organic Chemistry and
Enzymology; Verlag Chemie: Weinheim, 1982; Chapter 3.
(3) On the basis of the theoretical transition structure of hydride transfer
involving 1,4-dihydropyridine (Wu, Y.-D.; Houk, K. N. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1987, 109, 2226) and the well-defined normal C-H bond length of
1.073 Å for R2CH2 (The Chemist’s Companion; Gordon, A. J., Ford, R.
A., Eds.; John-Wiley: New York, 1987), one can estimate the net distance
for an effective hydride transfer to be approximately 0.55 Å or less (see:
Kreevoy, M. M.; Ostovic, D.; Truhlar, D. G.; Garrett, B. C. J. Phys. Chem.
1986, 90, 3766).
glycidol derivatives are a mixture of 9, 10, and 11.14 Interestingly,
(4) (a) Smart, B. E. In Organofluorine Chemistry, Principles and Commercial
Applications; Banks, D. E., Smart, B. E., Tatlow, J. C., Eds.; Plenum
Press: New York, 1994; Chapter 3. (b) Zhao, Z.; Liu, H.-w. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 66, 6810.
(5) (a) Hudlicky, M.; Pavlath, A. E. Chemistry of Organic Fluorine
Compounds II; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1995. (b)
Chambers, R. D. Fluorine in Organic Chemistry; John Wiley: New York,
1973.
(6) (a) Reed, A. E.; Schleyer, P. v. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 1434.
(b) Dixon, D. A.; Fukunaga, T.; Smart, B. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986,
108, 4027. (c) Sleigh, J. H.; Stephens, R.; Tatlow, J. C. J. Fluorine Chem.
1980, 15, 411.
(7) Chambers, R. D.; Bryce, M. R. In ComprehensiVe Carbanion Chemistry;
Buncel, E., Durst, T., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1987; Part C, Chapter
5.
(8) The rfbD gene (Jiang, X.-M.; Neal, B.; Santiago, F.; Lee, S. J.; Romana,
L. K.; Reeves, P. R. Mol. Microbiol. 1991, 5, 695) was amplified by the
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the genomic DNA of Salmonella
enterica LT2 as the template and was cloned into a pUC18 vector.
Purification of the RfbD protein (TDP-L-rhamnose synthase) from the E.
coli HB101-rfbD recombinant strain involved two chromatographic
steps: DEAE-Sepharose and Mono Q.
(9) The scheme and a brief discussion of the synthesis can be found in the
Supporting Information.
(10) Because the natural substrate (1) has a â-configuration at the anomeric
carbon, only the â-isomer of 8 should be recognized and processed by
TDP-L-rhamnose synthase.
(11) A typical assay included 5 mM compound 8 (mixture of R/â isomers),
2.8 mM NADH, 1 µM of enzyme in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer
(pH 7.5). This mixture was incubated at 25 °C for 60 min, and the products
were analyzed directly by NMR or derivatized followed by GC/MS
analysis.12
(12) (a) Weigel, T. M.; Liu, L.-d.; Liu, H.-w. Biochemistry 1992, 31, 2129.
(b) Lonngren, J.; Svensson, S. AdV. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 1974,
29, 41. (c) Rubenstein, P. A.; Strominger, J. L. J. Biol. Chem. 1974, 249,
3776.
(13) Arnold, L. J.; You, K. Methods Enzymol. 1978, 54, 223.
(14) Compound 9 was the predominant species derived mainly from the
unreacted 8r, and no 10 and 11 were detected when the incubation was
performed in the absence of enzyme.
(15) The fact that 13 could only be detected by MS analysis (to give 10) but
not by 19F NMR indicates that little of this intermediate was accumulated
during turnover.
(16) (a) Vinson, W. A.; Prickett, K. S.; Spahic, B.; Ortiz de Montellano, P. R.
J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4661. (b) Ichikawa, J.; Sonoda, T.; Kobayashi,
H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 1641.
(17) (a) Jones, M., Jr., Moss, R. A., Eds. Carbenes; Wiley: New York, 1973;
Vol. I, Chapter 1. (b) Moss, R. A.; Ho, G.-J.; Liu, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 959.
(18) Evenseck, J. D.; Houk, K. N. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 5518.
(19) (a) Groves, J. T.; Avaria-Neisser, G. E.; Fish, K. M.; Imachi, M.;
Kuczkowski, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 3837. (b) Kluger, R.
Chem. ReV. 1987, 87, 863. (c) Kern, D.; Kern, G.; Neef, H.; Tittmann,
K.; Killenberg-Jabs, M.; Wikner, C.; Schneider, G.; Hu¨bner, G. Science
1997, 275, 67. (d) Lee, J. K.; Houk, K. N. Science 1997, 276, 942.
the mass spectra for the C-4 containing fragments in 10 and 11 are
uniformly shifted by one mass unit, and each of those fragments
in 11 also contains a M + 2 peak. Such an increment of one and/
or two mass unit(s) of these C-4 bearing fragments is indicative of
deuterium incorporation from [4′S-2H]-NADH into the turnover
products at C-4′ of the exocyclic difluoromethylene group. Such a
reversal of regioselectivity for hydride transfer has not been reported
for pyridine nucleotide-dependent enzymes.
Our results may be directly explained by a mechanism in which
the addition of hydride from NADH occurs at the difluorinated
carbon of the exocyclic methylene double bond of 8 (Scheme 2A).
The π bond can be restored when the nascent carbanion (12)
eliminates one of the â-fluorines to give 13.15 A second round of
hydride reduction will result in loss of the remaining vinylic fluoride
to afford 14.16 This mechanistic proposal is unique because the
enzyme-catalyzed hydride transfer takes place at the opposite end
of the π bond in the reduction of a difluoromethylene group from
what is observed in the reduction of a carbonyl group. An alternative
route (Scheme 2B), which does not alter the regiochemistry of the
initial hydride addition, is also conceivable. This mechanism
involves the formation of a carbene intermediate (15) followed by
a 1,2-H shift to give 13, which then undergoes a second round of
carbene formation and 1,2-H rearrangement to yield the observed
product (14). The proposed rearrangement is well documented in
carbene chemistry17 and is expected to be extremely facile.18
However, while proposed, the intermediacy of a carbene species
has not been fully substantiated in enzyme catalysis.19
Clearly, the difluoromethylene functionality in compound 8 has
assumed a role as a carbonyl mimic with an apparently reversed
regioselectivity for hydride reduction. The implication of either the
reversal of the site of hydride attack or the participation of a carbene
intermediate to account for the experimental results is provocative.
While the regiospecificity of hydride reduction in enzyme reactions
is determined by the effective binding of the substrate with a defined
orientation in the enzyme active site, our results indicate that the
JA021487+
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 21, 2003 6349