Organometallics
Communication
similar yields of the desired product were obtained with the
bromide and iodide, only a trace amount of product 3 could be
detected with the chloride derivative. Different bromoarenes
were examined next. Aromatic rings bearing cyano (4), ester
(10), and methylsulfonyl (11) groups were well-tolerated
under the mild reaction conditions, delivering the correspond-
ing O-arylation products in high yields. When sterically
hindered ortho-substituted aryl bromides (known to be difficult
substrates for classical Cu-catalyzed Ullmann coupling
reactions18) were used as reaction partners, the coupling still
proceed smoothly to furnish adducts 9−12. Importantly, both
electron-neutral and electron-rich bromobenzenes were also
compatible with the optimized conditions, as demonstrated by
the efficient formation of diaryl ethers 5−9. Pyridine and
quinoline derivatives could also be used as nucleophiles in
these reactions to generate the corresponding heteroaryl ether
products 13 and 14, respectively.
The mechanism underlying the formation of C(sp2)−O
bonds via dual photoredox/nickel catalysis has been the focus
of numerous studies.12−14 Originally, reactions involving
aliphatic alcohols were proposed to proceed via a Ni(I)/
Ni(0) SET event at the expense of the photocatalyst.12a This
mechanism was later revised in order to rationalize the critical
role that quinuclidine plays in the reaction. Studies by Nocera
et al. showed that a self-sustained Ni(I)/Ni(III) catalytic cycle
is likely to operate in these transformations, with the amine
additive working both as a base and as a ligand to stabilize
dimeric Ni(I) species present in the reaction medium (Scheme
4e, bottom).14 In contrast, reactions involving carboxylic acids
Scheme 4. Control Experiments and Proposed Reaction
Mechanism
We then turned our attention to the phenolic component of
this etherification process. Phenols with both electron-
withdrawing and -donating groups at the para, meta, and
ortho positions were efficiently coupled, affording the
corresponding products in moderate to good yields (15−
21). 2-Naphthol proved to be a good cross-coupling partner,
producing diaryl ether 22 in 87% yield. Additionally, a bicyclic
flavanone derivative also furnished product 23 in 80% yield.
Further expansion of the scope was carried out by combination
of electron-neutral and -rich aryl bromides with phenols (24−
28). Etherifications of tyrosine and estrone derivatives were
also successful (29−32), again highlighting the potential of this
method in late-stage functionalization campaigns.19 In
addition, we found that both primary and secondary alcohols
are also effectively coupled to generate the corresponding alkyl
aryl ethers under these conditions (33, 34), showcasing the
generality of this protocol.
Symmetrical diaryl ethers were targeted next. It is well-
established that water can act as a nucleophile to form phenols
from aryl bromides under dual photoredox/nickel catalysis.13
A
fast survey of reaction parameters led to the optimal
conditions, which included ([Ir{dF(CF3)ppy}2(dtbpy)]PF6
(1 mol %) and NiBr2(dtbpy) (5 mol %) in the presence of
K3PO4 and H2O (2.0 equiv) in PhCF3 as the solvent.
Bromoarenes bearing both electron-withdrawing and elec-
tron-donating substituents delivered the corresponding sym-
metrical diaryl ethers 35−42 in moderate to excellent yields
under the above-mentioned conditions (Scheme 3).20
as oxygen partners12b seem to proceed through an excited
[ArNi(II)OC(O)R]* intermediate generated via energy trans-
fer from the photocatalyst, which thereby functions as a
sensitizer rather than as an electron shuttle (Scheme 4e, left).
Intrigued by how subtle differences in the reaction conditions
can affect both the scope and mechanism of these trans-
formations, we designed a number of control experiments to
better understand the individual steps operating in this
C(sp2)−OAr bond-forming process. At the outset, we
investigated the reaction of a Ni(0)−dtbpy complex in the
presence and absence of the photoredox catalyst. Importantly,
in the presence of 4CzIPN, the cross-coupled product 3 was
obtained in a yield comparable to that obtained when a Ni(II)
precatalyst was used. In contrast, in the absence of the
photocatalyst, only trace amounts of the diaryl ether could be
detected, even after prolonged heating (Scheme 4a). The high
efficiency of the C(sp2)−O bond formation in the presence of
a Ni(0) complex and 4CzIPN indicated that low-valent nickel
species, which can be formed in situ from NiBr2(dtbpy) at the
expense of the photocatalyst (Er1e/d2[4CzIPN*/[4CzIPN]−] =
+1.35 V vs SCE, Er1e/d2[NiII/Ni0] = −1.20 V vs SCE), are likely
a
Scheme 3. Reaction Scope for Symmetrical Diaryl Ethers
a
Aryl halide (0.2 mmol), H2O (0.2 mmol), 4-CzIPN (0.04 mmol, 2
mol %), NiBr2(dtbpy) (0.01 mmol, 5 mol %) and K3PO4 (0.4 mmol,
2.0 equiv) in 1.0 mL PhCF3 (0.2 M) irradiated with 34 W blue LED
for 36 h. Isolated yields from column chromatography are shown.
C
Organometallics XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX