Correlations between Supermolecules and Molecules
quantum yields.33 For substituents that possess π-con-
jugated bonding such as CN and carbonyl groups, the
π-conjugation effect on the spectra often surpasses the
induction effect (e.g., the fluorescence maximum 2D (521
nm) > 2A5/H+ (492 nm) in acetonitrile). Moreover, some
cations, particularly the paramagnetic cations (e.g., Ni2+
and Cu2+), could interact with the excited fluorophore not
only by electrostatic coordination but also by energy or
electron transfer, leading to fluorescence quenching.34
With these in mind, the nice supermolecule-molecule
correlation in both positions of spectra and the yields and
lifetimes of fluorescence for systems 1-3 appear to be
novel and unique, and it is anticipated that changes in
any one of the parameters (e.g., solvent and counterion)
will remove the observed correlations: namely, A15C5/
Ca2+(ClO4-)2 ∼ A18C6/Ba2+(ClO4-)2 ∼ Cl in acetonitrile
and A15C5/Na+(ClO4-) ∼ A18C6/K+(ClO4-) ∼ Cl in
dichloromethane.
Nonetheless, implications of these correlations deserve
our attention. An electronic correlation of a nitrogen atom
with a chlorine atom is reminiscent of their similarity in
electronegativity (3.04 vs 3.16).35 The main factor that
differentiates the electronic effect of an amino group from
that of a chloro substituent in aromatic compounds is the
resonance effect of the lone pair electrons. A good overlap
between the carbon and nitrogen 2p orbitals makes the
amino group an excellent electron donor, whereas the
poor overlap between the carbon 2p and chlorine 3p (or
sp3) orbitals keeps the chlorine atom as an electron-
withdrawing substituent. In this context, a reduction in
C-N orbital overlap will reduce the amino group reso-
nance effect and meanwhile the difference in electronic
effect between the amino nitrogen and the chlorine atom.
This could be achieved by pyramidalizing (sp3 hybridiza-
tion) the nitrogen atom and/or by twisting the C-N bond.
Indeed, an increase of the degree of pyramidalization of
the azacrown nitrogen upon metal ion complexation has
been observed in many other systems,7-10,36 and the
degree of pyramidalization in some cases correlates well
with the chromoionophoric shift.7 Azacrown-derived probes
that undergo complexation-induced C-N twisting have
also been reported.37 Since the alkali and alkaline-earth
metal ions that provide the strongest interactions for
A15C5 and A18C6 are Ca2+ and Ba2+, respectively, it
appears that the maximum electrostatic perturbation of
metal ions on the azacrown nitrogen in acetonitrile is to
localize the nitrogen lone-pair electrons. Our results also
suggest that a decrease in cation solvation on going from
acetonitrile to dichloromethane strengthens the electro-
static interaction between the azacrown and the metal
ions in such a way that Ca2+ and Ba2+ can further
polarize the N-M2+ coordination bond and results in a
partially positive-charged nitrogen, and that Na+ and K+
become capable of localizing the nitrogen lone pair
electrons. Regarding the distinct size of azacrown vs Cl,
the nice spectroscopic correlations observed herein indi-
cate that the excited-state behavior of the cation-bound
fluorophores 1-3 is insensitive to the motion of the
cation-bound azacrown moiety.
For comparison, the spectroscopic properties of donor-
substituted stilbene 4A5, its complex 4A5/Ca2+, and 4C
in acetonitrile were also examined (Table 1). While the
absorption maximum of 4A5/Ca2+ is approximately the
same as that of 4C, their fluorescence positions are rather
different (Table 1).38 The slightly lower value of logK
(4.4)11 for 4A5/Ca2+ in comparison to that for 1A5/Ca2+
-
3A5/Ca2+ might indicate a slightly weaker interaction
between Ca2+ and the azacrown nitrogen, but this ap-
pears not sufficient to account for the large discrepancies
in fluorescence maximum (4744 cm-1) between 4A5/Ca2+
and 4C. Instead, a weakening of the Ca2+-N bonding,
resulting in a weaker electronic influence of Ca2+ on the
azacrown nitrogen, on going from the ground state to the
excited state is implicated. This is in accord with the
previous studies on donor-donor- vs donor-(acceptor)-
type ICT systems, where the latter systems, including
4A5/Ca2+, are destined to undergo the excited-state Ca2+
decoordination reaction.11-13
Con clu d in g Rem a r k s
Novel spectroscopic correlations between metal ion-
complexed supermolecules and structurally related mol-
ecules have been observed, including 1A5/Ca2+-3A5/Ca2+
∼ 1A6/Ba2+-3A6/Ba2+ ∼ 1C-3C in acetonitrile and 1A5/
Na+-2A5/Na+ ∼ 1A6/K+-2A6/K+ ∼ 1C-2C in dichlo-
romethane. While comparisons between complexes and
molecules in the ground state by 1H NMR or UV-vis
absorption spectroscopy have been previously performed
for some azacrown-derived intrinsic fluoroionophores,8,29
the correlations reported herein have for the first time
allowed a more accurate description of the metal ion-
modulated electronic character of the azacrown nitrogen
in the excited state as well as in the ground state. A
persistent correlation in both the absorption (ground
state) and emission (excited state) spectra suggests that
the cation-azacrown interactions in these donor-donor
stilbenes are little affected by electronic excitation and
the subsequent relaxation of the fluorophores. The simi-
lar complex stability constants but distinct fluoroiono-
phoric behavior observed for systems 1-3 show that the
N-substituents can strongly affect the intrinsic properties
of the aminostilbene fluorophore but not the azacrown-
metal ion interactions. With such correlations, the elec-
tronic nature of the metal ion-perturbed fluorophores
could be further investigated based on the electronically
correlated molecules, since both experimental and theo-
retical studies on a molecule vs supermolecule are more
feasible. A modulation of the azacrown nitrogen with a
character from strongly electron donating (free probe) to
moderately electron withdrawing resembling a chlorine
atom (complexed probe) appears to be sufficient for
(33) (a) Saltiel, J .; Sun, Y.-P. Photochromism, Molecules and Sys-
tems; Du¨rr, H., Bouas-Laurent, H., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The
Netherlands, 1990; pp 64-164. (b) Saltiel, J .; Charlton, J . L. Rear-
rangements in Ground and Excited States; de Mayo, P., Ed.; Academic
Press: New York, 1980; Vol. 3, pp 25-89.
(34) Varnes, A. W.; Dodson, R. B.; Wehry, E. L. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1972, 94, 946-950.
(35) Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; Lide, D. R., Ed.; CRC
Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1997.
(36) Alfimov, M. V.; Churakov, A. V.; Fedorov, Y. V.; Fedorova, O.
A.; Gromov, S. P.; Hester, R. E.; Howard, J . A. K.; Kuz’mina, L. G.;
Lednev, I. K.; Moore, J . N. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1997, 2249-
2256.
(37) Witulski, B.; Weber, M.; Bergstra¨sser, U.; Desvergne, J .-P.;
Bassani, D. M.; Bouas-Laurent, H. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1467-1470.
(38) Compound 4C shows vibronic structures in the electronic
spectra. For the purpose of comparison with 4A5/Ca2+, the weighted
spectral maxima for the absorption and emission of 4C were estimated
to be ca. 308 and 350 nm, respectively.
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 69, No. 3, 2004 725