reaction as a simple and efficient method for the enantiospe-
cific preparation of compounds with vicinal tertiary and
quaternary stereocenters.6 In this communication, we extend
the method for the synthesis of compounds with adjacent
quaternary stereocenters, a common structural feature of
many natural products and one of the most demanding
challenges in organic synthesis.7 As a test case, we report a
diastereospecific total synthesis of the sesquiterpene her-
bertenolide (1), in which the bond connecting the vicinal
quaternary centers is formed in the solid state. This synthesis
represents the first time that a solid-state reaction is used
as a key step in the total synthesis of a natural product.
trapped in the crystal lattice of its precursor, the two radical
centers remain configurationally trapped until they can spin
flip to the singlet state (ISC′) to form the desired bond.
Even though a priori predictions of the crystallinity and
melting point of 3 are impossible, the presence of the ester
functional group should allow one to modify the physical
properties of the precursor by changing the nature of the
alkoxy substituent. The requisite trans configuration of 3
should arise from the diastereoselective acylation of the cor-
responding ketone precursor, prepared from 4. The synthesis
of (()-herbertenolide began with the commercially available
2-bromo-4-methylanisole (4) (Scheme 3). Lithiation of 4 with
Herbertenolide (1, Scheme 2) was first isolated and char-
acterized by Matsuo et al. from the leafy liverwort Herberta
Scheme 3 a
Scheme 2
a Conditions: (a) BuLi, cyclohexene oxide, BF3‚OEt2, THF, -78
°C; (b) DMSO, (COCl)2, Et3N, CH2Cl2, -78 °C; (c) NaH, MeI,
glyme, reflux; (d) LDA, MeI, THF, -0 °C to rt; (e) LDA,
CNCO2Me, ether.
adunca, the extract of which has been shown to exhibit a
remarkable growth suppression of certain plant pathogenic
fungi.8 To date, there have been only two reported syntheses
of this natural product.9 The two vicinal quaternary centers
in its structure present an ideal platform for testing our
proposed methodology. The retrosynthetic analysis outlined
in Scheme 2 suggests that formation of the lactone ring
should proceed spontaneously after hydrolysis of the ester
and deprotection of the ether group in 2. The preparation of
ester 2, which contains the target vicinal quaternary centers,
may be accomplished via the stereospecific solid-state pho-
todecarbonylation of the cyclohexanone precursor 3. As indi-
cated in Scheme 1, the reaction starts by electronic excitation
and proceeds by intersystem crossing to the triplet excited
state (ISC). We have shown that a substitution pattern such
as that of ester 3 can lower the bond dissociation energies
of the two R-bonds, thus facilitating sequential R-cleavage
and decarbonylation reactions within the lifetime of the trip-
let. As the 1,5-biradical formed in this manner is structurally
butyllithium followed by treatment with cyclohexene oxide
and BF3‚Et2O resulted in the acid-catalyzed epoxide opening
to give trans-cyclohexanol 5. Oxidation of 5 under Swern
conditions10 proceeded smoothly to give the desired 2-aryl-
cyclohexanone 6 with an overall yield of 96% over two steps.
After several low-yielding attempts at one-pot double-
methylation of 6, a sequential two-step procedure using
sodium hydride/MeI followed by LDA/MeI was found to
give the best yield of 7 (60%, two steps).
Acylation of 7 was then carried out using a modification
of Mander’s procedure11 with commercially available methyl
cyanoformate (Scheme 3). Satisfyingly, the resulting methyl
ester 3 was obtained in 72% yield with an excellent diastereo-
selectivity (>98:2). The ketoester 3 turned out to be a highly
crystalline material with a mp ) 96-97 °C. The desired
trans stereochemistry was unambiguously established by
X-ray crystallographic analysis (Figure 1), which revealed
a chair conformation with the aromatic group adopting an
equatorial position.12
(6) Ellison, M. E.; Ng, D.; Dang, H.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 2531-2534.
(7) (a) Overman, L. E.; Paone, D. V.; Stearns, B. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 7702-7703. (b) Corey, E. J.; Guzman-Perez, A. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 388-401. (c) Fuji, K. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 2037-
2066.
(8) (a) Matsuo, A.; Yuki, S.; Nakayama, M. Chem. Lett. 1983, 7, 1041-
1042. (b) Matsuo, A.; Yuki, S.; Nakayama, M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1986, 4, 701-710.
(9) (a) Eicher, T.; Servet, F.; Speicher, A. Synthesis 1996, 7, 863-870.
(b) Fukuyama, Y.; Yuasa, H.; Tonoi, Y.; Harada, K.; Wada, M.; Asakawa,
Y.; Hashimoto, T. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9299-9307.
(10) Mancuso, A. J.; Swern, D. Synthesis 1981, 3, 165-185.
(11) Crabtree, S. R.; Chu, W. L. A.; Mander, L. N. Synlett 1990, 3, 169-
170.
(12) Selected crystal data: C18H24O4, colorless prisms, FW ) 304.37
amu, space group P21/c, a ) 8.7539(13) Å, b ) 14.491(2) Å, c ) 13.0722-
(19) Å, â ) 95.806(3)°, Z ) 4, Fcalcd ) 1.225 Mg/m3, F(000) ) 656, λ )
0.71073 Å, T ) 100(2) K, crystal size ) 0.20 × 0.30 × 0.30 mm3. Of the
7269 reflections collected (2.10° e θ e 27.55°), 2915 [R(int) ) 0.0208]
were independent reflections; max/min residual electron density 273 and
-188 e/nm3, R1 ) 0.0352, wR2 ) 0.0907 (all data).
646
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 4, 2004