Han et al.
starting material to yield 37.0 g (98%) of crude proline methyl ester
hydrochloride. The crude salt (20 g, 120 mmol) was used without
further purification to give compound 2 (23.8 g, 86%). H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 1.39 and 1.43 (s, Boc rotamers 9H),
1.80-2.00 (m, 3H), 2.12-2.28 (m, 1H), 3.31-3.56 (m, 2H), 3.73
(s, 3H), 4.19-4.36 (m, 1 H). IR (neat, cm-1) νmax 2976, 2881, 1747,
1695, 1392, 1365, 1199, 1157, 1119, 1088, 1033, 999, 974, 922,
888, 858, 772. Identical NMR and IR spectra were observed
previously by Kurokawa et al.71
high sensitivity resonator at room temperature. Unless otherwise
indicated, the instrument settings used for general spectral acquisi-
tion are as follows: microwave power, 20 mW; modulation
amplitude, 1.2 G; receiver gain, 3.56 × 105; scan time 21 s; time
constant, 41 s; sweep width, 80 G. All the spin trapping studies
were carried out in a phosphate buffer (PBS) (10 mM) at pH 7.0
containing 100 µM diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA).
Sample cells used were 50 µL quartz or glass capillary tubes for
UV or non-UV irradiation experiments, respectively. The spectrum
simulation was carried out using an automatic fitting program.72
1
6-Oxo-7-oxa-1-azaspiro[4.4]nonane-1-carboxylic Acid tert-
Butyl Ester (3). To the compound, pyrrolidine-1,2-dicarboxylic
acid 1-tert-butyl ester 2-methyl ester 2 (4 g, 17.39 mmol), in dry
THF (100 mL) was slowly added lithium diisopropylamide (1.8
M, 18 mL) at -20 °C and the solution stirred for 30 min. The
solution was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for
1 h. Ethylene oxide gas was slowly bubbled through the solution
for 30 min at -20 °C, and the resulting mixture was stirred at room
temperature for 12 h. The progress of reaction was monitored by
TLC using hexane/EtOAc (7:3). The reaction was quenched by the
addition of water and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 30 mL), and the
collected organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and
filtered. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue was
purified by passing through the silica gel column using hexane-
EtOAc (7:3) as eluent to give the crystalline compound, 6-oxo-7-
oxa-1-azaspiro[4.4]nonane-1-carboxylic acid tert-butyl ester 3 (3
g, 33.4%): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ppm) δ 1.32 (s, 9H), 1.64-
2.14 (m, 5H), 2.53-2.88 (m, 1H), 3.40 (m, 2H), 4.07 (m, 1H),
4.24-4.43 (m, 1H); IR (neat, cm-1) νmax 2975, 2878, 1777, 1690,
1388, 1367, 1205, 1157, 1132, 1107, 1026, 982, 961, 931, 854,
770, 730, 693; EI-MS calcd for C12H19NO4 m/z 241.13, found
241.07; HRMS calcd for C12H19NNaO4+ (M + Na+) m/z 264.1212,
found 264.1201.
Spin Trapping. (a) Superoxide Radical Anion. (i) Light
Riboflavin. A 50 µL oxygenated PBS solution containing 0.1 mM
riboflavin and 50 mM CPCOMPO was irradiated with 150 W light
source positioned at 12 cm away from the sample cavity. (ii)
Xanthine-Xanthine Oxidase (X-XO). A 50 µL PBS solution
containing 100 µM DTPA, 0.4 mM xanthine, 0.5 unit/mL xanthine
oxidase, and 50 mM CPCOMPO was used. (iii) KO2-Generating
System. Superoxide adduct was generated by mixing 25 µL of 100
mM CPCOMPO in PBS and 50 µL of 100 mM KO2 in DMSO.
(iv) H2O2/Pyridine System. Pseudo-superoxide adduct was gener-
ated by mixing 50 mM CPCOMPO with 160 mM H2O2 in pyridine.
(b) Hydroxyl Radical. PBS solution containing 0.2% H2O2 and
50 mM CPCOMPO was irradiated for 5 min using a low-pressure
mercury vapor lamp at 254 nm wavelength. (c) Miscellaneous
•
Radicals. Spin trapping of SO3•-, CO2•-, CH3 CHOH, GS•, and
tBuO• was carried out in 50 µL PBS solution containing 50 mM
CPCOMPO, 0.2% H2O2, and 100 mM of the respective radical
source NaHCO2, Na2SO3, ethanol, GSSG, and (tBuO)2. Each of
the mixtures was irradiated with UV for a period of 5 min.
Kinetic Studies (a) Rate Constant of CPCOMPO-O2H
Formation and Decay. Detailed descriptions of the kinetic
procedure are given elsewhere,60,61 and the method used will be
only briefly reiterated here. Measurements were made at pH 7 in
a 10 mM PBS using a X-XO superoxide generating system. In a
typical experiment, a solution contains CPCOMPO (10, 50 or 120
mM), 0.4 mM xanthine, 0.5 unit/mL xanthine oxidase, and
3-carboxy-2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrrolidin-1-oxyl (3-CP, 1.0 µM) as
internal reference. An EPR spectrum of the solution was recorded
every 21 s (first recorded at the 42nd s) for ca. 1 h. Noise reduction
was accomplished using the singular value decomposition (SVD)
procedure. The kinetic curves of the adduct concentration [CP-
COMPO-O2H] as a function of time were obtained after decon-
volution of the signal using the pseudo-inverse method.61 This
approach leads to the curves representing only the time evolution
of the sole adduct CPCOMPO-O2H without any contribution from
the HO• adduct from a series of EPR spectra composed of mixtures
of paramagnetic species with different kinetic formation. These
calculations were achieved using a homemade computer program
written in FORTRAN, using subroutines given in Numerical
Recipes.73
Computer modeling of the kinetic curve obtained was achieved
using the homemade program Kalidaphnis (formerly Daphnis). The
use of this program written in FORTRAN has been described in
several papers,74,75 and it can be obtained upon request from the
authors. It allows fitting of experimental curves as signal amplitude
or concentration by numerical integration of appropriate rate
equations. Application of the standard least-square method yields
pertinent kinetic parameters and their respective error values. Using
this approach, the curves obtained at the three different initial
concentrations of CPCMPO (10, 50, and 120 mM) were considered
7-Oxa-1-azaspiro[4.4]nonan-6-one (4). To compound 3 (1.20
g, 5.0 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was slowly added trifluoroacetic
acid (TFA) (1 mL) at 0 °C. The mixture was allowed to warm to
room temperature and stirred for overnight. The solvent was
removed and basified with potassium carbonate and then extracted
with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL). The organic layer was collected and
dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and then filtered. The solvent
was evaported in vacuo to afford the amine 4 (0.52 g, 76%) and
was used without further purification. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3,
ppm) δ 1.88-2.10 (m, 4H), 2.23 (m, 1H), 2.33(m, 1H), 3.05 (m,
1H), 3.28 (m, 1H), 4.21 (q, 1H), 4.39 (m, 1H); IR (neat, cm-1
max 3630, 3534, 2983, 1775, 1422, 1379, 1282, 1220, 1191, 1158,
)
ν
1113, 1023, 959, 793, 693; EI-MS calcd for C7H11NO2 m/z 141.1,
+
found 141.0; HRMS calcd for C7H11NNaO2 (M + Na+) m/z
164.0687, found 164.0697.
7-Oxa-1-azaspiro[4.4]non-1-en-6-one, 1-Oxide (CPCOMPO).
Methyltrioxorhenium(VII) (17.5 mg, 0.07 mmol), EtOH (5 mL),
pyridine (28 µL, 0.35 mmol), and 30% H2O2 (511 µL, 4.5 mmol)
were added sequentially to a 25-mL round bottom flask. A solution
of the amino compound 4 (0.5 g, 3.55 mmol) in EtOH (5 mL) was
added dropwise at 0 °C. After the mixture was stirred at room
temperature for 1 h, 10 mL of water was added. The mixture was
extracted with DCM (3 × 30 mL), and the organic phase was dried
over MgSO4 concentrated, and purified on silica column using 5%
MeOH in DCM (Rf ) 0.15) to give white solid product (0.314 g,
57%): 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3, ppm) δ 2.20-2.35 (m, 2H),
2.78 (m, 2H), 3.02 (m, 1H), 3.23 (m, 1H), 4.42 (m, 1H), 4.71 (q,
1H), 6.98 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3, ppm) δ 26.2, 30.0,
32.3, 66.6, 78.3, 134.8, 173.8; IR (neat, cm-1) ν 3405, 1769, 1582,
1382, 1226, 1167, 1018; EI-MS calcd for C7+H9NO3 m/z 155.06,
found 155.0; HRMS calcd for C7H9NNaO3 (M + Na+) m/z
178.0480, found 178.0475.
(72) Rockenbauer, A.; Korecz, L. Appl. Magn. Reson. 1996, 10, 29.
(73) Press, W. H.; Teukolsky, S. A.; Vetterling, W. T.; Flannery, B. P.
Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN. The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed.;
Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1992.
EPR Measurements. General Methods. EPR measurements
were carried out on a Bruker EMX spectrometer equipped with
(74) Mathieu, C.; Tuccio, B.; Lauricella, R.; Mercier, A.; Tordo, P. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1997, 2501.
(75) Tuccio, B.; Lauricella, R.; Frejaville, C.; Bouteiller, J.-C.; Tordo,
P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1995, 295.
(70) Dondoni, A.; Perrone, D. Org. Synth. 2000, 77, 64.
(71) Kurokawa, M.; Shindo, T.; Suzuki, M.; Nakajima, N.; Ishihara, K.;
Sugai, T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 1323.
2540 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 73, No. 7, 2008