Reaction Modes for the Dimerization of Epoxyquinols
SCHEME 2. Oxid a tive Dim er iza tion of Hyd r oxyep oxyqu in on e 3 w ith DMP
epoxyquinols A and B,6 and just recently Mehta et al.
have also reported the synthesis of racemic epoxyquinols
A and B.7
While epoxyquinols A and B are epoxyquinol dimers,
torreyanic acid, isolated from an endophytic fungus,
Pestalotiopsis microspra, is an epoxyquinone dimer.8 The
proposed biosynthesis of torreyanic acid also involves an
oxidation/6π-electrocyclization/Diels-Alder reaction cas-
cade, and Porco et al. have developed an elegant bio-
mimetic total synthesis, backed up by theoretical calcula-
tions, in which only the epoxyquinol A-type dimer is
selectively formed.9
In the course of our total synthesis of epoxyquinols A
and B, we examined carefully the oxidation of monomer
3 and observed the following interesting phenomenon:
When monomer 3 was treated with the Dess-Martin
periodinane (DMP),10 both primary and secondary hy-
droxy groups were oxidized, affording cyclized 2H-pyran
derivatives 8a /b, which gave epoxyquinol A-type product
9 in 21% yield without formation of the epoxyquinol-B
type product (Scheme 2). The yield of 9 was increased to
70% when isolated epoxyquinone 6 was treated with
DMP (vide infra, Scheme 6).
The reaction modes for the Diels-Alder reaction initi-
ated by oxidation of epoxyquinol 3 can be classified as
follows: Consider the diene part first. The reacting face
of the diene is either anti or syn to the epoxide and anti
or syn to the methyl group, which we designate as
anti(epoxide) or syn(epoxide) and anti(Me) or syn(Me)
additions, respectively. When the diene and dienophile
molecules are the same, we call it homocoupling, while
heterocoupling is the reaction in which the diene and
dienophile components are different. Endo addition is an
addition in which the secondary orbital interaction
between the carbonyl of the dienophile and the diene is
present, while exo addition is an addition without such
an interaction. According to this classification, ep-
oxyquinols A and B are dimers of endo-anti(epoxide)-
anti(Me)-hetero addition and exo-anti(epoxide)-anti(Me)-
homo addition, respectively. In the dimerization of
epoxyquinol 3, the only two reaction modes observed are
the endo-anti(epoxide)-anti(Me)-hetero and exo-anti(ep-
F IGURE 1. Monomers 3, 6, 10, and 11.
oxide)-anti(Me)-homo modes, while the dimerization of
epoxyquinone 6 proceeds via a single mode, the endo-
anti(epoxide)-anti(Me)-hetero mode.
To understand the difference in reaction modes be-
tween epoxyquinol 3 and epoxyquinone 6, the oxidative
dimerization of a parent monomer, 10, without epoxide
and hydroxy groups, has been examined. The methoxy-
cyclohexenone 11 was also investigated to shed light on
the effect of the hydroxy group in 3. In this paper we
describe our investigation of the oxidation/6π-electro-
cyclization/Diels-Alder reaction by systematic compari-
son using the four monomers 3, 6, 10, and 11 together
with theoretical calculations (Figure 1).11
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
Syn th esis of Mon om er s. Synthesis of the epoxyquinol
monomer 3 has already been described.3,5 The epoxyquino-
ne monomer 6 was prepared from epoxyquinol monomer
3 according to Scheme 3, by protection of the primary
alcohol with TBS, followed by oxidation with DMP and
deprotection. The methoxy monomer 11 was prepared
from 12 by methyl ether formation12 and deprotection of
the TBS group as shown in Scheme 4. The cyclohexenone
monomer 10 with neither epoxy nor hydroxy functional-
ities was prepared according to Scheme 5. 3-Ethoxy-2-
cyclohexene-1-one (15)13 was treated with LiCH2SPh14 to
afford 3-(phenylthiomethyl)-2-cyclohexen-1-one (16), which
was converted to 3-formyl-2-cyclohexen-1-one (18) via
Pummerer rearrangement.15 Reduction with CeCl3-
NaBH4,16 protection of the primary hydroxy group, and
(5) Shoji, M.; Kishida, S.; Takeda, M.; Kakeya, H.; Osada, H.;
Hayashi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 9155.
(6) Li, C.; Bardhan, S.; Pace, E. A.; Liang, M.-C.; Gilmore. T. D.;
Porco, J . A., J r. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3267.
(7) Mehta, G.; Islam, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 3569.
(8) (a) Lee, J . C.; Yang, X.; Schwartz, M.; Strobel, G. A.; Clardy, J .
Chem. Biol. 1995, 2, 721. (b) Lee, J . C.; Strobel, G. A.; Lobkovsky, E.;
Clardy, J . J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3232. (c) J arvis, B. B. Chemtracts
1997, 10, 10.
(9) (a) Li, C.; Lobkovsky, E.; Porco, J . A., J r. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 10484. (b) Li, C.; J ohnson, R. P.; Porco, J . A., J r. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 5095.
(11) A preliminary communication of this work has been reported;
see: Shoji, M.; Kishida, S.; Kodera, Y.; Shiina, I.; Kakeya, H.; Osada,
H.; Hayashi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 7205.
(12) Greene, A. E.; Drian, C. L.; Crabbe, P. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1980,
102, 7583.
(13) Gannon, W. F.; House, H. O. Organic Syntheses; Wiley &
Sons: New York, 1973; Collect. Vol. V, p 539.
(14) Corey, E. J .; Seebach, D. J . Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 4097.
(15) Ishibashi, H.; Kameoka, C.; Kodama, K.; Ikeda, M. Tetrahedron
1996, 52, 489.
(10) (a) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J . C. J . Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155. (b)
Dess, D. B.; Martin, J . C. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7277. (c)
Ireland, R. E.; Liu, L. J . Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 2899.
(16) Gemal, A. L.; Luche, J .-L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 5454.
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 69, No. 5, 2004 1549