3932 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 120, No. 16, 1998
Steenken and GoldbergeroVa
Concerning the possibility of intramolecular H-transfer from
a C to a phosphate oxyl radical, it may be relevant that the
•-
analogous intermolecular reaction, i.e., that between HPO4
/
•2-
PO4 and ribose or deoxyribose, does in fact exist, the rate
constants measured at pH 924 being 9 × 107 and 7.5 × 107
M-1 s-1 25
.
Support for the intramolecular transfer of an H• from a C
to a phosphate oxygen (eq 4/7) comes from ESR-measure-
ments of γ-irradiated silver diethyl phosphate, where the
-
•CH2CH2O(CH3CH2O)PO2 radical was seen and interpreted
as resulting from H-transfer to the initially formed radical
• 26
oxidation product (EtO)2PO2 . Intramolecular H-transfers have
been found also in other alkyl phosphates.27 Of relevance is
also the fact28 that in the mass spectra of trialkyl phosphates,
the positive molecular ion decomposes very rapidly such that
its contribution to the recorded spectrum is almost zero. In the
case of tributyl phosphate, this has been interpreted as resulting
from an intramolecular H-transfer from a carbon to the oxygen
of the P-oxyl group.29
•
Figure 9. Absorption spectrum measured on reaction of OH with
1 mM EGP at pH 8 (a). Comparison with absorption spectrum of
•CH2CHO (b; from ref 20).
been shown18 to undergo a rapid, heterolytic elimination of
inorganic phosphate to yield â-oxoalkyl radicals which are
oxidizing in character.19 In this reaction (eq 5), the formyl
methyl radical is produced which has been shown20 to be able
to abstract an H-atom from R-hydroxyalkanes. If this hap-
pens (eq 6), a chain reaction is started, the chain carrier being
•CH2CHO, the products of the chain reaction are acetaldehyde
and inorganic phosphate, in equal yields, as experimentally
observed (see Table 2).
As evident, the H-transfer mechanism eq 7 involves a six-
membered transition state, which is a way possible only for
alkyl phosphates with R g Et. For R ) CH3, the transition
state necessarily involves the less favorable five-membered ring,
and this, together with the higher C-H bond energy of a pri-
mary vs a secondary alkyl group, is probably the reason why
the rate constant for H-transfer in methyl phosphate (e 105 s-1
)
is lower than that with ethyl- (7.9 × 105 s-1) or the higher
phospates (>5 × 107 s-1). In the case of 2-hydroxyethyl
phosphate, H-abstraction from the 2-position should be strongly
enhanced by the activating effect of the OH-group. In agree-
ment with this is the fact that k(abstraction) is in fact larger
•
In the presence of oxygen, the chain carrier, CH2CHO, is
scavenged, as is visible from the dramatic decrease in the yield
of CH3CHO and the increase in the yield of glycolaldehyde.
Under this condition, the yield of inorganic phosphate should
be equal to that of the primarily produced (by the ionization)
phosphate radicals, and this is in fact the case, as seen from
Table 2 (φ(phosphate)oxygen ) 0.46 as compared to φ(e-aq) )
0.43).
than 5 × 107 s-1
.
Ribose-5-phosphate. Product analysis experiments were also
performed after 193 nm photolysis of ribose-5′-phosphate at pH
8. It was found that in aqueous deoxygenated solution (Ar or
N2O-saturated) the quantum yield of inorganic phosphate was
0.2 which dropped to 0.08 when O2 (1 mM) was admitted. Of
organic compounds in deoxygenated solution, the main pho-
tolysis products were 5-deoxypentos-4-ulose, pentos-4-ulose,
and pentodialdose. In the presence of O2 (1 mM), the yield of
5-deoxypentos-4-ulose dropped to below the detection limit,
whereas those of pentos-4-ulose and pentodialdose remained
approximately the same.
To check the formation of the formylmethyl radical from
ethyleneglycolphosphate, pulse radiolysis experiments were
performed with an N2O-saturated aqueous solution of 1 mM
HOCH2CH2OPO32-. Under this condition, the OH-radicals
produced by the pulse are expected to abstract an H-atom from
a carbon atom of the substrate, preferably from the â-carbon
relative to the phosphate group. This carbon is activated by
the OH-group it carries. The resulting R-hydroxy-â-phosphato
radical is the same as that from the intramolecular H-atom shift
to the phosphato radical (eq 4/7) and is expected to rapidly
undergo the heterolytic â-phosphate elimination reaction 5
yielding the formylmethyl radical. In Figure 9 the measured
spectrum is compared with that of the authentic21 formylmethyl
radical: The similarities between the two spectra with respect
to band position and epsilon are satisfactory.22 The rate constant
These results can be explained (Schemes 1 and 2) by
photoionization of the phosphate group (φ ) 0.46) followed
by intramolecular H-abstraction by the ionization-produced
phosphato-radical from C4 (main reaction), and from C5.
H-abstraction from C4 is via a six-membered transition state,
as shown in Scheme 1.
2-
measured for the reaction of OH• with HOCH2CH2OPO3 is
The resulting C4-radical then eliminates a phosphate anion
2.3 × 109 M-1s-1, similar to that (2.4 × 109 M-1s-1 21
)
for
in a heterolytic fashion. This is the famous C4′-mechanism3,4
reaction with ethyleneglycol. From the fact that there was no
(21) Bansal, K. M.; Gra¨tzel, M.; Henglein, A.; Janata, E. J. Phys. Chem.
1973, 77, 7, 16.
•
delayed formation of absorption due to CH2CHO in a 1 mM
solution of HOCH2CH2OPO32- at pH 8 it is concluded that the
rate constant for (the intramolecular) elimination of phosphate
(22) The fact that in the HOCH2CH2OPO32- case the absorption at <280
nm is stronger than that of the formylmethyl radical may be due to the
additional formation of the R-phosphatoalkyl radical from the reaction of
from the â-phosphato radical (eq 5) is g2.3 × 109 M-1 s-1
×
HOCH2CH2OPO3 with OH•.
2-
10-3 M ) 2.3 × 106 s-1, a value in agreement with analogous
(23) See, e.g., ref 18 and Behrens, G.; Koltzenburg, G.; Schulte-Frohlinde,
cases.23
D. Z. Naturforsch. 1982, 37c, 1205.
(24) Due to pKa(HPO4•-) ) 8.9,10 the rate constant refers mainly to the
•2-
(18) Samuni, A.; Neta, P. J. Phys. Chem. 1973, 77, 1425. Steenken, S.;
Behrens, G.; Schulte-Frohlinde, D. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1974, 25, 205. See,
also: Steenken, S. In Free Radicals: Chemistry, Pathology and Medicine;
Rice-Evans, C., Dormondy, T., Eds.; Richelieu Press: London, 1988; p
51.
less reactive form, i.e., PO4
.
(25) Nakashima, M.; Hayon, E. J. Phys. Chem. 1970, 74, 3290.
(26) Bernhard, W. A.; Ezra, F. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1974, 78, 958.
(27) Haase, K. D.; Schulte-Frohlinde, D.; Kourim, P.; Vacek, K. Int. J.
Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1973, 5, 351.
(19) Steenken, S. J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83, 595.
(20) von Sonntag, C.; Thoms, E. Z. Naturforsch. B 1970, 25, 1405.
Burchill, C. E.; Perron, K. M. Can. J. Chem. 1971, 49, 2382.
(28) McLafferty, F. W. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 306; Quayle, A. In
AdVances in Mass Spectrometry; Pergamon: London, 1959; p 365.
(29) .Wilkinson, R. W.; Williams, T. F. J. Chem. Soc. 1961, 4098.